Results 1 - 10
of
24,557
Table 8. Visual perception tests
"... In PAGE 19: ...ye. All subjects had a Snellen acuity above 6/9.3. Mean thresholds for the two groups are presented in Table8 .... In PAGE 19: ...resented in Table 8. None of the variables showed a significant group effect (all p values gt;.20). Table8 here In coherent motion detection, it appears that our subjects had much higher thresholds than in comparable published studies (e.... ..."
Table 2: Replication of Weatherford apos;s Results - 1960 a Alternative Measures of Economic Perceptions Dependent Variables: Vote for Incumbent for President
"... In PAGE 6: ... Thus these ndings also support Weatherford apos;s contention that working class voters are more sensitive to the economy than are middle class voters. [ Table2 Here] 3 Measures of Class Now we test to see if the result Weatherford obtained in 1960 is sensitive to choice of model speci cation. Our major test here is to determine if the choice of the Centers occupation based class measure over alternative measures of class, such as income, a ects the result.... ..."
Table 2. Sample parameters affecting visual perception
2004
"... In PAGE 3: ... We focus here on visual perception, but have considered a similar parameter set for aural percep- tion. Table2 shows a number of parameters associated with visual perception. Small changes in these parameters can be significant.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 2. Sample parameters affecting visual perception
2004
"... In PAGE 3: ... We focus here on visual perception, but have considered a similar parameter set for aural percep- tion. Table2 shows a number of parameters associated with visual perception. Small changes in these parameters can be significant.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 2. Sample parameters affecting visual perception
2004
"... In PAGE 3: ... We focus here on visual perception, but have considered a similar parameter set for aural percep- tion. Table2 shows a number of parameters associated with visual perception. Small changes in these parameters can be significant.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 5: Customer Perception Variables and Dimensions
2003
"... In PAGE 15: ... Hence, we formulate some hypotheses representing the relationship between perceptual variables and the target variable (that is, the churn incidence). Table5 gives an overview of previous retention findings with regard to the customer perception category. INSERT TABLE 5 ABOUT HERE It is clear from Table 5 that an enormous variety of perception variables have been investigated in previous retention research.... In PAGE 15: ... Table 5 gives an overview of previous retention findings with regard to the customer perception category. INSERT TABLE 5 ABOUT HERE It is clear from Table5 that an enormous variety of perception variables have been investigated in previous retention research. Considerable efforts have been done to explore the impact of overall customer satisfaction, service quality and relational performance on (intended) retention behaviour.... In PAGE 16: ...16 switching costs are measured as quot;the investments done by the buyer with regard to his/her relationship with the seller quot;, while Jones et al (2000) used three other dimensions to describe the construct and while the same authors (Jones et al, 2002) investigated another 6 dimensions of switching costs in their subsequent research. In general, and based on Table5 , one can conclude that most perceptual variables have no or a negative impact on churn. In contrast, some authors report unexpected findings suggesting e.... ..."
Cited by 14
TABLE 1. The proportion of sense perception in the operation of physical model Sense perception Vision 78% Touch 22% Hearing 0% Tasting 0% Smelling 0%
"... In PAGE 3: ... At the same time, we prepared a 1/400 physical model (Figure 1) made from cardboard and a digital model (Figure 2) in the software of 3D MAX and Director 3D VR. First, the invited subjects were asked to tell us what proportion of sense perception ( TABLE1 ) they might use while designing with physical model so that we could get a most proportion of vision and touch. However, as for touch, here we explained it as an interactive perception of physical model.... ..."
Table 5. Non-speech perception tests Backward
"... In PAGE 17: ... A repeated measures analysis showed that this did not interact with the group factor (F(1,30) lt;1). Results of the non-speech tests are summarised in Table5 . For each subject we considered the median of the 2 to 4 thresholds measured per condition.... In PAGE 17: ...ong stimuli (F(1,30)= 8.26, p=.007) as well as with short stimuli (F(1,30)= 6.4, p=.017). In all conditions where group differences were observed, they were attributable to the high thresholds of 5-7 dyslexics. Table5 here There are several ways to assess the overall auditory performance of subjects in relation to dyslexia. According to the magnocellular theory, dyslexics should be poor at rapid auditory processing, i.... ..."
Table 1 Perceptions of Impacts and Facets of Science (in percentages)
in Europe
"... In PAGE 8: ... For reasons that are discussed in the literature, we confine ourselves here to the data from split A, which accommodates respondents lacking strong or elaborated views, either because they feel distant from the statement they are being asked to evaluate or because more complex reasons incline them to a neutral evaluative stance (Faulkenberry and Mason 1978; Krosnick 2002; Pardo and Calvo 2002; Schuman and Presser 1996; Thiessen and Blasius 1998).4 Table1 reproduces the literal wording of the items, with plus signs indi- cating that agreement denotes a positive view of science and minus signs indicating that agreement denotes a negative view. The rationale behind the construction of the battery of items shown in Table 1 was not to formally explore the different facets of science as perceived by the public but rather to select a number of impacts presumably representative of all the major practical consequences of scientific research, whose aggregate score would provide a measure of attitudes to the science object.... In PAGE 8: ...4 Table 1 reproduces the literal wording of the items, with plus signs indi- cating that agreement denotes a positive view of science and minus signs indicating that agreement denotes a negative view. The rationale behind the construction of the battery of items shown in Table1 was not to formally explore the different facets of science as perceived by the public but rather to select a number of impacts presumably representative of all the major practical consequences of scientific research, whose aggregate score would provide a measure of attitudes to the science object. One fundamental flaw of this battery is that, except for one item (referring to support for basic science, itself a label most people would find hard to grasp), it leaves no room at all for views of science as a way of knowing the world.... In PAGE 8: ... The eval- uative standpoint embedded in the battery is purely instrumental (transfor- mation and control of the world), a shortcoming that should be corrected in future studies. With this proviso, examination of Table1 provides an initial snapshot of which consequences of science meet with approval (the plus- sign items, for which the percentage of agreement exceeds that of dis- agreement, and the minus-sign items, for which disagreement exceeds agreement, which we group here for ease of reading in two blocks of favor- able and unfavorable impact).5 In fifteen of the twenty-three items, the percentages obtained indicate pos- itive views or attitudes toward science in the European Union as a whole (in nine of thirteen items with positive wordings and six of ten items with negative wordings), while the other eight clearly indicate the existence of crit- ical positions (four of the thirteen items with positive wordings and four of the ten items with negative wordings).... In PAGE 10: ...11 Table1 (continued) Neither .... In PAGE 11: ...e., agree or disagree ), we can single out the low salience for particular segments of the public, or even the public at large, of some aspects of the science-society interaction, their complexity or cognitive barriers, and, secondarily, an ambivalent perception on the part of the respondent (typically choosing in this case a neutral response, which has been characterized as a substantive response with less 12 Science Communication Table1 (continued) Neither .... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
24,557