"... In PAGE 53: ...6% of active chip area). Parma achieves a somewhat greater performance on a general-purpose processor at the same clock rate (see Table7 ). The major difference between the two systems is that Parma has a bigger type domain in its analysis (see Figure 10 and Section 2.... In PAGE 57: ... 4 The Evolution of Performance Due to faster machines and improved compilation technology, the performance of Prolog has increased about two orders of magnitude since DEC-10 Prolog. Table7 gives the execution time ratios, relative to DEC-10 Prolog, of a set of representative systems running the five Warren benchmarks [159]. For the reasons given below, the numbers in Table 7 do not generalize to large programs.... In PAGE 57: ... Table 7 gives the execution time ratios, relative to DEC-10 Prolog, of a set of representative systems running the five Warren benchmarks [159]. For the reasons given below, the numbers in Table7 do not generalize to large programs. They should be seen only as indicating trends.... In PAGE 57: ... They should be seen only as indicating trends. Table7 is split into two parts. The first five rows show the performance of specialized hardware.... In PAGE 57: ...imes on DEC-10 Prolog. The benchmarks were timed with a failure-driven loop. The deriv benchmark is the sum of the four benchmarks times10, log10, divide10, and ops8. The last column of Table7 gives the harmonic mean of the speedup ratios. Performance is one of the few quantifiable measures of a system.... In PAGE 59: ...arious primitive operations (e.g., multiplication can vary an order of magnitude in speed even on systems with the same clock). An important difference between the SPARC-based and R3000-based systems in Table7 is that the latter have a faster memory system. 5 Future Paths in Logic Programming Implementation This section gives a personal view of the trends in sequential logic programming implementa- tion.... ..."

"... In PAGE 52: ...6% of active chip area). Parma achieves a somewhat greater performance on a general-purpose processor at the same clock rate (see Table7 ). The major difference between the two systems is that Parma has a bigger type domain in its analysis (see Figure 10 and Section 2.... In PAGE 56: ... 4 The Evolution of Performance Due to faster machines and improved compilation technology, the performance of Prolog has increased about two orders of magnitude since DEC-10 Prolog. Table7 gives the execution time ratios, relative to DEC-10 Prolog, of a set of representative systems running the five Warren benchmarks [159]. For the reasons given below, the numbers in Table 7 do not generalize to large programs.... In PAGE 56: ... Table 7 gives the execution time ratios, relative to DEC-10 Prolog, of a set of representative systems running the five Warren benchmarks [159]. For the reasons given below, the numbers in Table7 do not generalize to large programs. They should be seen only as indicating trends.... In PAGE 56: ... They should be seen only as indicating trends. Table7 is split into two parts. The first five rows show the performance of specialized hardware.... In PAGE 56: ...imes on DEC-10 Prolog. The benchmarks were timed with a failure-driven loop. The deriv benchmark is the sum of the four benchmarks times10, log10, divide10, and ops8. The last column of Table7 gives the harmonic mean of the speedup ratios. Performance is one of the few quantifiable measures of a system.... In PAGE 58: ...arious primitive operations (e.g., multiplication can vary an order of magnitude in speed even on systems with the same clock). An important difference between the SPARC-based and R3000-based systems in Table7 is that the latter have a faster memory system. 5 Future Paths in Logic Programming Implementation This section gives a personal view of the trends in sequential logic programming implementa- tion.... ..."

"... In PAGE 52: ...6% of active chip area). Parma achieves a somewhat greater performance on a general-purpose processor at the same clock rate (see Table7 ). The major difference between the two systems is that Parma has a bigger type domain in its analysis (see Figure 10 and Section 2.... In PAGE 56: ... 4 The Evolution of Performance Due to faster machines and improved compilation technology, the performance of Prolog has increased about two orders of magnitude since DEC-10 Prolog. Table7 gives the execution time ratios, relative to DEC-10 Prolog, of a set of representative systems running the five Warren benchmarks [159]. For the reasons given below, the numbers in Table 7 do not generalize to large programs.... In PAGE 56: ... Table 7 gives the execution time ratios, relative to DEC-10 Prolog, of a set of representative systems running the five Warren benchmarks [159]. For the reasons given below, the numbers in Table7 do not generalize to large programs. They should be seen only as indicating trends.... In PAGE 56: ... They should be seen only as indicating trends. Table7 is split into two parts. The first five rows show the performance of specialized hardware.... In PAGE 56: ...imes on DEC-10 Prolog. The benchmarks were timed with a failure-driven loop. The deriv benchmark is the sum of the four benchmarks times10, log10, divide10, and ops8. The last column of Table7 gives the harmonic mean of the speedup ratios. Performance is one of the few quantifiable measures of a system.... In PAGE 58: ...arious primitive operations (e.g., multiplication can vary an order of magnitude in speed even on systems with the same clock). An important difference between the SPARC-based and R3000-based systems in Table7 is that the latter have a faster memory system. 5 Future Paths in Logic Programming Implementation This section gives a personal view of the trends in sequential logic programming implementa- tion.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ...Table1 comes from [30] for the Netherlands and from [9, 3, 4, 6, 1] for Germany2. The main flaw in the present passport numbering schemes is the low entropy of BAC keys.... In PAGE 9: ...able 3. Eavesdropping Settings and Information for a Cryptanalytical Attack. Setting Knowledge on the Passport Holder Note S1 issuing state S2 issuing state, photo of passport holder S3 issuing state, date of birth S4 issuing state, relevant only for Germany site of eavesdropping S5 issuing state, site of relevant only for Germany eavesdropping, and photo of passport holder additional BAC keys as result of a successful key search improves the knowledge on issued passports and thereby the configuration of key search algorithms in terms of efficiency. Adversary A1 with the lowest capabilities knows the public parameters of the e-passport issuing system (see Table1 ) but does not know any passport numbers. A2 already owns a sparely filled database of BAC keys that may be gained by collecting passport data from customers, e.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... The components of the system and spe- ci#0Cc tasks with it were verbally presented to the subjects. Table1 shows the order in which system compo- nents were introduced to the users. It also shows the higher-level issues that were being implicitly introduced at each stage.... In PAGE 10: ... The speci#0Cc tasks that the students carried out varied between subject pairs, but the core of the evaluation was constant. As shown in Table1 , the tasks began by famil- iarising students with TurboTurtle as a collabora- tive tool. For example, initially they were asked to directly manipulate the turtle, with the intended e#0Bect that they learn, through their experiences, concepts such as telepointers, collaborative ma- nipulation, and how TurboTurtle can behave as a shared sketchpad.... ..."