"... In PAGE 6: ...any cases. We only report it when the significance was found in this section. 5.1 User interaction Table1 shows participants apos; interactions with the four layouts evaluated in our ex- periment. The second column shows the average number of queries submitted to the interface per search session.... In PAGE 7: ...One of the noticeable differences in Table1 is the number of iterations. Partici- pants tended to submit more queries to the interface in the summary layouts compared to the baseline layout.... In PAGE 7: ... More iteration in the summary layouts led to a greater number of result pages viewed by participants to find relevant documents. However, the click per page ratio shown in the sixth column of Table1 suggests that participants tended to click fewer records in the summary layouts. Given that an underlying search engine was identical across the layouts, this suggests that participants made more relevance judgements based on the document surrogates in the summary layouts, thus, they did not have to visit the retrieved pages as much as they did with the baseline layout.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ...ases. We only report it when the significance was found in this section. 5.1 User Interaction Table1 shows participants apos; interactions with the four layouts evaluated in our experiment. The second column shows the average number of queries submitted to the interface per search session.... In PAGE 7: ... The numbers in 2nd to 5th rows are a mean value across 24 sessions, and the standard deviation of the value is shown in the brackets. One of the noticeable differences in Table1 is the number of iterations. Partici- pants tended to submit more queries to the interface in the summary layouts compared to the baseline layout.... In PAGE 7: ... More iteration in the summary layouts led to a greater number of result pages viewed by participants to find relevant documents. However, the click per page ratio shown in the sixth column of Table1 suggests that participants tended to click fewer records in the summary layouts. Given that an underlying search engine was identical across the layouts, this suggests that participants made more relevance judgements based on the document surrogates in the summary layouts, thus, they did not have to visit the retrieved pages as much as they did with the baseline layout.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ...any cases. We only report it when the significance was found in this section. 5.1 User interaction Table1 shows participants apos; interactions with the four layouts evaluated in our ex- periment. The second column shows the average number of queries submitted to the interface per search session.... In PAGE 8: ...One of the noticeable differences in Table1 is the number of iterations. Partici- pants tended to submit more queries to the interface in the summary layouts compared to the baseline layout.... In PAGE 8: ... More iteration in the summary layouts led to a greater number of result pages viewed by participants to find relevant documents. However, the click per page ratio shown in the sixth column of Table1 suggests that participants tended to click fewer records in the summary layouts. Given that an underlying search engine was identical across the layouts, this suggests that participants made more relevance judgements based on the document surrogates in the summary layouts, thus, they did not have to visit the retrieved pages as much as they did with the baseline layout.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... CONTEXTS OF COLLABORATIVE INTERFACESCollaborative musical interfaces may be roughly classified by a number of different attributes unique to the context of communal experience. Table1 provides a sample listing of multiplayer systems organized by the following elements of design: Focus, Location, Media, Scalability, Player Interaction, Musical Range, Physical Interface, Directed Interaction, Pathway to Expert Performance and Level of Physicality. Design issues regarding the input interface, input-to-output mapping and the output interface are of the utmost relevance as well as the topic ofmuchresearch.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...3 After completing the four assigned searches (plus one training search) for each system, each participant completed measures of usefulness (6 items), ease of use (6 items), and two dimensions of flow (4 items each). The results from these measures are shown in Table4 . (Note that lower scores indicate more positive attitudes.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ...Table 1: Typology and examples of user context As shown in Table1 , many kinds of user context information can be potentially exploited [7]. Explicit context consists of informa- tion given by a user explicitly, whereas implicit context refers to any context information naturally available while a user interacts with a retrieval system.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ...Table 1: Typology and examples of user context As shown in Table1 , many kinds of user context information can be potentially exploited [2]. Explicit context consists of informa- tion given by a user explicitly, whereas implicit context refers to any context information naturally available while a user interacts with a retrieval system.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ... Consider an example of a subset of an on-line store. Table1 shows four parameters and each of their equivalence classes that we refer to as options for the parameters . Interactions in- clude combinations of the options for different parameters.... ..."