### Table 7. Error detection probabilities (%) with confidence intervals at 95%. No confidence interval can be estimated for measured detection probabili- ties of 100.0%.

"... In PAGE 7: ... 4. Results In Table7 , we can see the estimates of the detection probabilities per signal, per executable assertions and totals, as obtained using error set E1. The measures are calculated according to the formulas for coverage estimation in [18].... In PAGE 8: ... As with the measures for error set E1, we used the formulas described in [18] to derive the probabilities shown in the table. The probabilities shown in Table 9 are estimates of Pdetect, whereas the probabilities shown in Table7 are estimates of Pds (for more information on the definition of these probabilities, see section 2.4).... ..."

### Table 3 Sensitivity and Specificity per parameter

"... In PAGE 39: ...05). Table3 provides the study estimates for the sensitivity and specificity of the pre-operative ICP and StO2 values. Our current results are quite comparable to those from the aforementioned smaller studies, there- 38 Figure 1 Flow chart of patient follow up *Two patients failed to undergo the MRI examination.... ..."

### Table 1. Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Probabilities of Numbers of Slips Per Day for Case 5.

### Table 3. Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Probabilities of Numbers of Slips Per Day for Case 7.

"... In PAGE 2: ... For each case, 300 independent replications of a one-day simulation were run. Results in [1] (see Table3 and Figs. 4-6 of [1]) show that the 10.... ..."

### Table 7: Confidence Intervals

"... In PAGE 42: ... However, if we consider the capacity dimensioning on the target network as just in the current case, this identification is no longer meaningful. Finally, in order to investigate the accuracy of our measurement results, we present a confidence interval of the estimated TCP throughput in Table7 . We can observe that the width of all confidence intervals is very narrow, which indicates that the sufficient quantity of data was collected to put a confidence on results.... ..."

### Table 3. Influence of good probability estimation: comparison of accuracy and AUC of the first decision tree (Single) with accuracy and AUC of the overall delegating classifier (Del50%). PrNoSmooth NoPrNoSmooth NoPrLaplace NoPrMbranch

2004

Cited by 15

### Table V. Parameter Estimates of the Additive Genetic Models

2006

Cited by 2

### Table 1: Generalization error estimates and confidence intervals.

2006

"... In PAGE 9: ... The datasets used and the results obtained by the two algorithms are summarized in Table 1. From Table1 , we see that, for all 5 datasets, the results obtained by the sphere covering algorithm are either better than or comparable to the best results obtained by the SVMs. The sphere covering algorithm also tends to display less variance in the error estimate.... ..."

### Table II. Digital estimates and confidence intervals.*

2003