### Table amp;Results of multiple regression analysis of demographic factors, type A behaviour and job stressors against total mental health index, free-floating anxiety, somatic anxiety and depression

### Table 2--Total float (TF), free float (FF), safety float (SF), and independent float (IF), for the sample project (fig. 1)

1986

### Table 2: Positioning with respect to an object: Joint limits and singularity avoidance

"... In PAGE 8: ...igure 5.c). Global task function: joint limits and kine- matic singularities avoidance This experiment is similar to the previous one ; we have only changed the initial camera position. The initial position of the camera, is located in the vicinity of four joint limits (q1, q2, q4 and q6) and the manipulator is in singularity q5 = 90 dg (see Table2 ). If none strategy is used to avoid joint limits, the visual task cannot be achieved.... In PAGE 8: ...b). Table2 presents the obtained results according to the strategy using the acti- vation thresholds presented in Section 3. We can see on Figure 7.... ..."

### Table 2. The statistical results for dynamic manipulations.

1997

"... In PAGE 11: ... links that needed changes and the link update time among the three different models. Statistics are presented in Table2 to quantitatively illustrate the information obtained. We also tested the box room scene for the case of a decrease in the total net energy.... In PAGE 11: ... 10. The top part of Table2 lists the number of input surfaces, input objects, resulting elements, resulting links and its constituent parts, Obj.... In PAGE 11: ... The results show that the proposed progressive strategy effectively avoided unnecessary links, thus reducing the total rendering time. The bottom section of Table2 shows that the proposed dynamic framework rejected from 39.62% to 90.... In PAGE 11: ...inks in the scenes; hence, only 9.67% to 60.38% of the links required further visibility computation. The bottom line of Table2 gives link update times, including the time needed for the reject test, visibility computation, and image updating, for each scene. We can conclude that the link updating time was in proportion to both the model complexity and the number of resulting links, and was relatively small compared to the time needed for refine-... ..."

### Table 1: Manipulator and Object Parameters

1996

"... In PAGE 26: ... The dynamic model for each manipulator was taken from [29]. The link and object parameters are given in Table1 . The object inertia matrix and Coriolis and gravity vector are Do = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0:2 0 0 0 0:2 0 0 0 0:02 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 ; Eo = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0 1:96 0 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 : (90) The motion of the manipulators and the object is depicted in Figure 3.... ..."

Cited by 9

### Table 1: Manipulator and Object Parameters

1996

"... In PAGE 26: ... The dynamic model for each manipulator was taken from #5B29#5D. The link and object parameters are given in Table1 . The object inertia matrix and Coriolis and gravity vector are D o = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0:2 0 0 0 0:2 0 0 0 0:02 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 ; E o = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0 1:96 0 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 : #2890#29 The motion of the manipulators and the object is depicted in Figure 3.... ..."

Cited by 9

### Table III: Descriptive Statistics This table shows the descriptive statistics of the data and the securities included in the sample. Stocks are sorted according their Euro trading volume into two groups. All fig- ures (except for number of securities) are equal-weighted means for the securities in- cluded in the group. Market value and free float are calculated for the October 1st, 2003. We report medians across securities. Pair-wise Mann-Whitney U tests are used to test the null-hypothesis that two samples are drawn from identical populations. Characteris- tics from the less liquid stock sample that differ from corresponding characteristics at the sample with highly liquid stocks at a 0.01; 0.05 or 0.1 level are denoted with a ***; **; *, respectively.

in Without You:

2006

### Table 1. Manipulator Parameters

2000

"... In PAGE 5: ... The main reason for this is the fact that the dynamics are highly involved, b e ing comprised of coupled nonlinear differential equations. The general form of the manipulator dynamics is given by (1) and the nominal values of the parameters are summ a rized in Table1 in standard units. The architecture of the manipulator is illustrated in Fig.... ..."

Cited by 5

### Table 1. Manipulator Parameters

"... In PAGE 2: ... The main reason for this is the fact that the dynamics are highly involved, b e - ing comprised of coupled nonlinear differential equations. The general form of the manipulator dynamics is given by (1) and the nominal values of the parameters are summ a - rized in Table1 in standard units. The architecture of the manipulator is illustrated in Fig.... ..."

### Table 1: Manipulator parameters

1998

"... In PAGE 4: ... Simulation Performace of the control laws are compared in a series of simulations of a 6-dof parallel-link manipulator. The important manipulator parameters are shown in Table1 . Actual param- eters are used in the simulation of the manipulator dynamics and the estimates are used in computing the control laws for the effects of parametric uncertainty.... ..."