"... In PAGE 3: ... are used to characterize the context. Table 1 contrasts the choice of terminology with underlying characteristics of the two types of learning environments, while Table2 illustrates their differences in the context of pedagogy and environment. While e-learning was still compatible with the classroom paradigm, m-learning calls for environment- and time independent pedagogy.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ... Distribution of attitude towards Internet-based simulation. N=194 Table7 shows the regression analysis in which the dependent variable is the attitude towards Internet- based simulations. The predictors in this regression consist of the variables user satisfaction, characteristics of the participants and the year of the simulation.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... Internet-based B2BEC can impact various business processes, from the design stage of products, down to supporting after-sales customer service. Table1 illustrates business... ..."

"... In PAGE 11: ...10 The first part of the taxonomic instrument focuses on specific attributes, and the corresponding variables, associated with the process of transaction preparation. Table1 lists these, and provides a motive for their inclusion. The second part of the taxonomic instrument focuses on specific attributes, and the corresponding variables, associated with the process of transaction completion (see Table 2).... In PAGE 20: ... Transaction completion can be divided into two components: trade settlement and product delivery. In the light of claims about the potential of B2B e-commerce as a platform for online settlement, it was surprising to find that relatively few of the B2B e-hubs in the research sample explicitly stipulated, that once trading parties had agreed to enter into an exchange, payment would take place through the use of electronic payment mechanisms (see Table1 1). This arrangement was observed only in 12 per cent (N=9) of the agriculture/horticulture and three per cent (N=3) of the garments/apparel exchanges that the B2B e-hubs supported.... In PAGE 22: ...28 October 2001 Draft 1 22 Insert Table 12 about here ====================================================== The kinds of support services that users could access included shipping and delivery services, facilities inspection services, financial services, customs brokering, insurance services, and travel services (see Table1 3). For example, shipping and/or delivery support services were accessible to trading parties in 34 per cent (N=26) of the agriculture/horticulture and 53 per cent... In PAGE 40: ...28 October 2001 Draft 1 40 Table1 0: Product and Partner Information in Garments/Apparel B2B Exchange Structures Type of Exchange Structure (N=107) Product Specification Information Product Quality Assurance Mechanisms Buyer/Seller Assurance User Decides No Info about terms Product PhotosA Samples OfferedA Lab ReportsA Facilities InspectionA,C Certification Mentioned? Registration Required Participant Screening Credit Rating InfoF Buyer/Seller Reputation StatementsG Trade Leads (N=39) 35 4 14 4 2 13 1B 34 25 6 3 Request For Quotes (N=18) 16 2 7 7 4 8 0 17 11 6 2 Auction (N=20) 17 3 8 3 1 12 0 19 15 8 2 e-Retail (N=3) 0 3 2 1D 1D 1 0 3 3 1 0 Direct Buyer / Seller Link (N=24) 22 2 20 3 2 7 1E 23 13 3 0 Unknown 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 3 3 0 0 Total 90 (84%) 17 (16%) 54 (50%) 18 (17%) 11 (10%) 41 (38%) 2 (2%) 99 (93%) 70 (65%) 24 (22%) 7... In PAGE 42: ...28 October 2001 Draft 1 42 Table1 1: Exchange Settlement Mechanisms Payment Mechanisms Agriculture/Horticulture Exchanges (N=77) Garments/Apparel Exchanges (N=107) Off-line Settlement (Letter of Credit, Cheque) 4 (5%) 4 (4%) Online Settlement (Direct Debit/Deposit, Credit Card) 9 (12%) 3 (3%) Trading Parties Determine 56 (73%) 91 (85%) No Information 8 (10%)... In PAGE 43: ...28 October 2001 Draft 1 43 Table1 2: Access to Delivery Mechanisms Agriculture/Horticulture ExchangesA (N=77) Garments/Apparel ExchangesA (N=107) Marketplace Provider Determines Delivery Mechanism 11 (14%)B 2 (2%)C Trading Parties Responsible for Arranging Delivery of GoodsD 58 (75%) 90 (84%) No Delivery Related Information Offered 8 (11%) 15 (14%) A For some B2B e-hubs the type of delivery mechanism employed is contingent upon the exchange structure used by trading parties engaging in a transaction. Therefore, to ensure continuity the total number of exchanges is used to calculate the percentage rather than the total number of B2B e-hubs examined.... In PAGE 44: ...28 October 2001 Draft 1 44 Table1 3: Buyer/Seller Access to Logistical Support ServicesA Type of Support Service Agriculture/Horticulture Exchanges (N=77)B Garments/Apparel Exchanges (N=107)B Shipping/Delivery Support Offered 26 (34%) 57 (53%) Facilities Inspection 8 (10%) 42 (39%) Financial Services (e.g.... ..."

"... In PAGE 11: ... Table 1 lists these, and provides a motive for their inclusion. The second part of the taxonomic instrument focuses on specific attributes, and the corresponding variables, associated with the process of transaction completion (see Table2 ). As the mapping of the e-hubs proceeded, 118 B2B e-hubs were eliminated from the original garment/apparel sample, and 119 were eliminated from the agriculture/horticulture sample.... ..."