• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 28,614
Next 10 →

A framework for learning predictive structures from multiple tasks and unlabeled data

by Rie Kubota Ando, Tong Zhang, Peter Bartlett - Journal of Machine Learning Research , 2005
"... One of the most important issues in machine learning is whether one can improve the performance of a supervised learning algorithm by including unlabeled data. Methods that use both labeled and unlabeled data are generally referred to as semi-supervised learning. Although a number of such methods ar ..."
Abstract - Cited by 440 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
kind of classifiers have good predictive power) from multiple learning tasks. We present a general framework in which the structural learning problem can be formulated and analyzed theoretically, and relate it to learning with unlabeled data. Under this framework, algorithms for structural learning

Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training

by Avrim Blum, Tom Mitchell , 1998
"... We consider the problem of using a large unlabeled sample to boost performance of a learning algorithm when only a small set of labeled examples is available. In particular, we consider a setting in which the description of each example can be partitioned into two distinct views, motivated by the ta ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1614 (34 self) - Add to MetaCart
algorithm's predictions on new unlabeled examples are used to enlarge the training set of the other. Our goal in this paper is to provide a PAC-style analysis for this setting, and, more broadly, a PAC-style framework for the general problem of learning from both labeled and unlabeled data. We also

Text Classification from Labeled and Unlabeled Documents using EM

by Kamal Nigam, Andrew Kachites Mccallum, Sebastian Thrun, Tom Mitchell - MACHINE LEARNING , 1999
"... This paper shows that the accuracy of learned text classifiers can be improved by augmenting a small number of labeled training documents with a large pool of unlabeled documents. This is important because in many text classification problems obtaining training labels is expensive, while large qua ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1033 (19 self) - Add to MetaCart
quantities of unlabeled documents are readily available. We introduce an algorithm for learning from labeled and unlabeled documents based on the combination of Expectation-Maximization (EM) and a naive Bayes classifier. The algorithm first trains a classifier using the available labeled documents

The Elements of Statistical Learning -- Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction

by Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, Jerome Friedman
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1320 (13 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey

by Xiaojin Zhu , 2006
"... We review the literature on semi-supervised learning, which is an area in machine learning and more generally, artificial intelligence. There has been a whole spectrum of interesting ideas on how to learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, i.e. semi-supervised learning. This document is a chapter ..."
Abstract - Cited by 757 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
We review the literature on semi-supervised learning, which is an area in machine learning and more generally, artificial intelligence. There has been a whole spectrum of interesting ideas on how to learn from both labeled and unlabeled data, i.e. semi-supervised learning. This document is a

Learning with Labeled and Unlabeled Data

by Matthias Seeger , 2001
"... In this paper, on the one hand, we aim to give a review on literature dealing with the problem of supervised learning aided by additional unlabeled data. On the other hand, being a part of the author's first year PhD report, the paper serves as a frame to bundle related work by the author as we ..."
Abstract - Cited by 197 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
In this paper, on the one hand, we aim to give a review on literature dealing with the problem of supervised learning aided by additional unlabeled data. On the other hand, being a part of the author's first year PhD report, the paper serves as a frame to bundle related work by the author

Self-taught learning: Transfer learning from unlabeled data

by Rajat Raina, Alexis Battle, Honglak Lee, Benjamin Packer, Andrew Y. Ng - Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Conference on Machine Learning , 2007
"... We present a new machine learning framework called “self-taught learning ” for using unlabeled data in supervised classification tasks. We do not assume that the unlabeled data follows the same class labels or generative distribution as the labeled data. Thus, we would like to use a large number of ..."
Abstract - Cited by 295 (20 self) - Add to MetaCart
We present a new machine learning framework called “self-taught learning ” for using unlabeled data in supervised classification tasks. We do not assume that the unlabeled data follows the same class labels or generative distribution as the labeled data. Thus, we would like to use a large number

Learning the Kernel Matrix with Semi-Definite Programming

by Gert R. G. Lanckriet, Nello Cristianini, Laurent El Ghaoui, Peter Bartlett, Michael I. Jordan , 2002
"... Kernel-based learning algorithms work by embedding the data into a Euclidean space, and then searching for linear relations among the embedded data points. The embedding is performed implicitly, by specifying the inner products between each pair of points in the embedding space. This information ..."
Abstract - Cited by 780 (22 self) - Add to MetaCart
Kernel-based learning algorithms work by embedding the data into a Euclidean space, and then searching for linear relations among the embedded data points. The embedding is performed implicitly, by specifying the inner products between each pair of points in the embedding space. This information

Learning to rank using gradient descent

by Chris Burges, Tal Shaked, Erin Renshaw, Matt Deeds, Nicole Hamilton, Greg Hullender - In ICML , 2005
"... We investigate using gradient descent methods for learning ranking functions; we propose a simple probabilistic cost function, and we introduce RankNet, an implementation of these ideas using a neural network to model the underlying ranking function. We present test results on toy data and on data f ..."
Abstract - Cited by 510 (17 self) - Add to MetaCart
We investigate using gradient descent methods for learning ranking functions; we propose a simple probabilistic cost function, and we introduce RankNet, an implementation of these ideas using a neural network to model the underlying ranking function. We present test results on toy data and on data

Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization

by Fabrizio Sebastiani - ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS , 2002
"... The automated categorization (or classification) of texts into predefined categories has witnessed a booming interest in the last ten years, due to the increased availability of documents in digital form and the ensuing need to organize them. In the research community the dominant approach to this p ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1658 (22 self) - Add to MetaCart
to this problem is based on machine learning techniques: a general inductive process automatically builds a classifier by learning, from a set of preclassified documents, the characteristics of the categories. The advantages of this approach over the knowledge engineering approach (consisting in the manual
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 28,614
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University