### Table 2: Comparing CCD and CMOS sensors CCD CMOS

"... In PAGE 16: ... Products have arrived but are for now restricted to the more expensive range of professional digital SLR cameras. Figures 19 and 20 show the major components in typical CCD and CMOS imaging chips, while Table2 compares CCD with CMOS in several respects. CMOS technology differs from CCDs in a number of interesting ways that could potentially lead to a new breed of HDR-enabled cameras (Janesick, 2002; Litwiller, 2005).... ..."

### Table 7 Options for Custom CMOS Imager Features

"... In PAGE 10: ... In addition, the readout and processing of the imager information must keep pace with the response time in order to optimize the dynamic range of the system and allow noise reduction through on-chip and off-chip processing. Table7 identifies various options for features of a custom imager. Some of these options have been included in existing custom chips (Chips A, B and C), while Chip D, the custom rangefinder chip, is in the design phase at present.... ..."

### Table 3b. Solution Statistics for Model 2 (Minimization)

1999

"... In PAGE 4: ...6 Table 2. Problem Statistics Model 1 Model 2 Pt Rows Cols 0/1 Vars Rows Cols 0/1 Vars 1 4398 4568 4568 4398 4568 170 2 4546 4738 4738 4546 4738 192 3 3030 3128 3128 3030 3128 98 4 2774 2921 2921 2774 2921 147 5 5732 5957 5957 5732 5957 225 6 5728 5978 5978 5728 5978 250 7 2538 2658 2658 2538 2658 120 8 3506 3695 3695 3506 3695 189 9 2616 2777 2777 2616 2777 161 10 1680 1758 1758 1680 1758 78 11 5628 5848 5848 5628 5848 220 12 3484 3644 3644 3484 3644 160 13 3700 3833 3833 3700 3833 133 14 4220 4436 4436 4220 4436 216 15 2234 2330 2330 2234 2330 96 16 3823 3949 3949 3823 3949 126 17 4222 4362 4362 4222 4362 140 18 2612 2747 2747 2612 2747 135 19 2400 2484 2484 2400 2484 84 20 2298 2406 2406 2298 2406 108 Table3 a. Solution Statistics for Model 1 (Maximization) Pt Initial First Heuristic Best Best LP Obj.... In PAGE 5: ...) list the elapsed time when the heuristic procedure is first called and the objective value corresponding to the feasible integer solution returned by the heuristic. For Table3 a, the columns Best LP Obj. and Best IP Obj.... In PAGE 5: ... report, respectively, the LP objective bound corresponding to the best node in the remaining branch-and-bound tree and the incumbent objective value corresponding to the best integer feasible solution upon termination of the solution process (10,000 CPU seconds). In Table3 b, the columns Optimal IP Obj., bb nodes, and Elapsed Time report, respectively, the optimal IP objective value, the total number of branch-and-bound tree nodes solved, and the total elapsed time for the solution process.... ..."

### Table 1 Comparison of ALOHA to RMP*Comp for a TDI Release

in Developing a Risk Management Program For A Flexible Polyurethane Foam Manufacturing Facility #326

"... In PAGE 7: ...16. Table1 shows the comparison of results between the RMP*Comp program and the ALOHA dispersion model predicted distances to the toxic endpoint for TDI. In all cases the RMP*Comp program shows further downwind distance to the toxic endpoints than ALOHA.... In PAGE 7: ... This not only qualifies the facility for Program 1 of the RMP regulations but also helps with public image. Table1 also shows the effect of using the highest temperature and highest liquid storage temperature for evaluating the worst-case scenario, even though this may never occur at a FPF facility. In most cases the ALOHA results show that this assumption would calculate the distance to be increased by 30 to 90 meters.... ..."

### Table 5: Comparisons of via number and runtime for the sequential optimization with steady-state analysis, the sequential optimization with transient analysis and the simultaneous optimization with transient analysis.

"... In PAGE 6: ... straints with targeted voltage violation Vmax of 0:2V , and then allocate vias to satisfy the thermal integrity constraints with tar- geted temperature Tmax of 52 C and considering the already stapled \power/ground quot; vias for heat removal. Table5 presents the results. The vias are over-designed when using steady-state analysis.... In PAGE 6: ... Finally, we compare the results using simultaneous optimization and sequen- tial optimization. On average, our simultaneous optimization fur- ther reduces 34% vias compared to the the sequential optimiza- tion by steady-state analysis in Table5 , and reduces 22:5% vias compared to the sequential optimization with transient analysis. 6.... ..."

### TABLE 3. Optimized analog coefficients. Coefficient 2-2 2-1-1

"... In PAGE 12: ... Behavioral simulations show that the calculations of the upper bounds of the integrator outputs, which have been made assuming a DC or low-frequency input, remain valid for the second stage whose input contains the first stage quantization noise and therefore is not low-frequency. TABLE3 . Optimized analog coefficients.... ..."

### Table 9 shows the values of these measures at the same levels of sensor noise as in Table 8. The values decrease as the level of sensor noise is

"... In PAGE 71: ... Each measure can be used to indicate one aspect of the quality of the MAR models. However, the values in Table9 do not indicate any clear threshold values that could be used, for example, as criteria in deciding whether a model should be omitted from further analysis. Table 9.... In PAGE 71: ... However, the values in Table 9 do not indicate any clear threshold values that could be used, for example, as criteria in deciding whether a model should be omitted from further analysis. Table9 . The distance of the noise covariance matrix from the identity matrix as a function of the level of sensor noise.... ..."

### Table 1. Characteristics of transient image sensor.

2002

Cited by 12

### Table 3: Grid reduction and CPU times for transient analysis. Design Exact transient time MG transient time

"... In PAGE 7: ... As explained earlier, the proposed multigrid-like technique is even more advantageous when applied for transient analysis. This is illustrated in Table3 , which shows the time required to run a transient simulation of the power grids of the two designs using a regular solver and the proposed technique. The power grids are simulated for a duration of 4 ns with 0.... ..."

### Table 3: Grid reduction and CPU times for transient analysis. Design Exact transient time MG transient time

"... In PAGE 7: ... As explained earlier, the proposed multigrid-like technique is even more advantageous when applied for transient analysis. This is illustrated in Table3 , which shows the time required to run a transient simulation of the power grids of the two designs using a regular solver and the proposed technique. The power grids are simulated for a duration of 4 ns with 0.... ..."