Results 1 - 10
of
50,417
Table VII Performance comparison of network RPC and message-passing systems
1993
Cited by 43
Table VII. Performance comparison of network RPC and message-passing systems
1993
Cited by 43
Table 1: Measured latency of di erent message-passing systems on di erent networks
"... In PAGE 3: ... We therefore measured both latency and bandwidth for the message-passing libraries used on the di erent networks. Table1 shows latencies in microseconds measured for three di erent networks (Ethernet, FDDI, SOCC) using two di erent message-passing systems (PVM3, PVM/6000). For the standard PVM3, latencies are nearly the same for each network and are rather high: in the range of 1700 to 1950 microseconds.... ..."
TABLE IV MESSAGE-PASSING SYSTEM CALLS. THE LAST TWO CALLS ARE FOR USE BY PROTOCOL SERVERS.
1996
Cited by 1
Table 1: Classi cation of existing message passing systems. Programmable NIC Non Programmable NIC
2001
"... In PAGE 2: ...the NIC. Table1 shows the classi cation of existing message passing systems along with EMP. These Ethernet messaging systems use non-programmable NICs.... ..."
Cited by 60
Table 1: Classi cation of existing message passing systems. Programmable NIC Non Programmable NIC
2001
"... In PAGE 2: ...the NIC. Table1 shows the classi cation of existing message passing systems along with EMP. These Ethernet messaging systems use non-programmable NICs.... ..."
Cited by 60
Table 2: Message-passing system calls. The last two calls are for use by protocol servers. N1 N2
1996
Cited by 12
Table 3.1: \Ping-pong quot; comparison of message passing systems.
Table 4.1: \Ping-pong quot; comparison of message passing systems.
Results 1 - 10
of
50,417