Results 11 - 20 of 80,795

Table 1 : Classification of tactile input technologies.

in Touch-sensing input devices
by Ken Hinckley, Mike Sinclair 1999
Cited by 28

Table 2 Processing times and access times for two algorithms after given number of evaluated permutations, for n = 30 and grouping [2,7,10,15,18,20,24,26,30].

in A parallel hill climbing algorithm for pushing dependent data in clients-providers-servers systems
by Francisco Javier Ovalle-martínez, Julio Solano González, Ivan Stojmenović
Cited by 1

Table 3: Summary comparison of three VOD systems. References [1] A. Gelman, H. Kobrinski, L. Smoot, and S. Weinstein, \A store-and-forward architecture for video-on-demand service, quot; in ICC apos;91, 1991. [2] J. Allen, B. Heltai, A. Koenig, D. Snow, and J. Watson, \VCTV: A video-on-demand market test, quot; AT amp;T Technical Journal, pp. 7{14, Jan/Feb 1992. [3] T. Little and D. Venkatesh, \Prospects for interactive video-on-demand, quot; IEEE Multimedia, pp. 14{23, Fall 1994. [4] J. Wong and M. Ammar, \Analysis of broadcast delivery in a videotex system, quot; IEEE Trans- actions on Computers, pp. 863{866, Sep 1985. [5] J. Wong and M. Ammar, \Response time performance of videotex systems, quot; IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, pp. 1174{1180, Oct 1986. [6] G. Herman, G. Gopal, K. Lee, and A. Weinrib, \The datacycle architecture for very high throughput database systems, quot; in Proceedings of SIGMOD, ACM, 1987. 22

in On the Use of Multicast Delivery to Provide a Scalable and Interactive Video-on-Demand Service
by Kevin C. Almeroth, Mostafa H. Ammar 1996
"... In PAGE 21: ... The results were also useful for evaluating the relative usefulness of multicast delivery and evaluating the cost of providing interactivity in VOD systems. Table3 summarizes these comparisons. Finally we discussed our experiences in developing a proto- type based on the concepts presented in this paper.... ..."
Cited by 114

Table 2. Standard deviations for input devices and interaction styles

in Human-Computer Interaction design for emerging technologies: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Mobile Computer Systems
by Jesper Kjeldskov, Jesper Kjeldskov, Jesper Kjeldskov 2003
"... In PAGE 18: ... These papers constitute all publications on HCI for virtual reality, augmented reality and mobile computer systems between 2000 and 2002 in the 15 conference proceeding series and journals listed in table 2 below. Conference proceeding series and journals Virtual Reality Augmented Reality Mobile Computers Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, CHI, ACM 7 2 8 Conference on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST, ACM 0 3 9 Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI, ACM 1 0 2 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, ACM 0 0 2 Conference on Designing Augmented Reality Environments, DARE, ACM 0 10 0 Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST, ACM 20 2 0 Conference on Virtual Reality, IEEE 25 1 0 Conference on Augmented Reality, IEEE 0 14 0 Symposium on HCI with Mobile Devices, Mobile HCI 0 0 30 Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS, ACM 1 1 3 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Si3D, ACM 4 0 0 Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, TOCHI, ACM 0 2 9 Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Springer-Verlag 0 3 39 Journal of Virtual Reality, Springer-Verlag 4 4 0 Journal of Computers and Graphics, Elsevier 3 5 6 Total 65 47 108 Table2 . Distribution of classified research papers ... In PAGE 58: ... 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Form Filling Menu Selection Direct Manipulation Interaction styles S t an d a rd d evi at i o n Figure 12. Standard deviations for average completion times Table2 show the standard deviations of the measured task completion times for the different test subjects in relation to a specific combination of input device and interaction style. These are depicted in figure 13.... In PAGE 121: ... Research Method Case studies Field studies Action research Lab experiment Survey research Applied research Basic research Normative writings Understand 24 7, 21 11, 25 32 29, 34 Engineer 17, 18, 21, 30, 33 20 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 15, 26, 27, 28, 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 46 13 11, 12 Re-engineer 19, 23, 43, 47 Evaluate 24, 26, 28, 44 5, 9, 11, 19, 23, 25, 27, 31, 40, 43 6 10, 32, 37 Re se arc h P u rpos e Describe 17 1, 15, 23, 42 14, 16, 22, 35, 36, 45 Table2 . Classification of HCI research papers for augmented reality 1.... ..."
Cited by 1

Table 2. Summary of deadlock-handling techniques in distributed databases. PRINCIPLE ADVANTAGES MAJOR COSTS RELEVANT

in The deadlock problem: an overview
by Sreekaanth S. Isloor, T. Anthony Marsland 1980
"... In PAGE 14: ... This in turn has repercussions, since the information may be out of date by the time it arrives. A summary of these techniques for handling deadlock in database systems is given in Table2 , along with an indication of their advantages and costs.... ..."
Cited by 11

Table 12: Data for ATUM Traces on 32K Caches [3] J. H. Chang, H. Chao, and K. So, \Cache Design of A Sub-Micron CMOS System/370, quot; in Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 208{213, IEEE Computer Society and ACM SIGARCH, June 2{5, 1987. Computer Architecture News, 15(2), June 1987. [4] John L. Hennessy and David A. Patterson, Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Ap- proach. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1990. [5] Mark D. Hill, \A Case for Direct-Mapped Caches, quot; Computer, 21(12):25{40, December 1988.

in A Unified Framework for Hybrid Access Cache Design and Its Applications
by Kevin B. Theobald, Herbert H. J. Humy, Guang R. Gao 1993
Cited by 1

Table 5. Most cited Journals in ER papers up to 1999. Journal Title # Cites ACM Transactions on Database Systems 886 Communications of the ACM 278

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 4: ... Source names in Table 4 follow the journal abbreviations used by the Web of Science. See Table5 for a list of the most popular ones. Table 4 is predominated by journal papers, except the two ER papers by Scheuermann and Santos.... In PAGE 4: ... Table 4 is predominated by journal papers, except the two ER papers by Scheuermann and Santos. Table5 lists most frequently cited journals in ER papers between 1979 and 1999. Table 1.... ..."

Table IV. Loop Datapaths for GSM MEM PORT #0 FU0 RG0 jEj0

in The Design of Dynamically Reconfigurable Datapath Coprocessors
by Zhining Huang, Sharad Malik, Nahri Moreano, Guido Araujo

Table 4 compares the best solutions obtained by LNS with the best published cost values. The best published results are taken from [6, 20, 21, 24, 26]. We show in the table the best published solution, and the best solution obtained by either Rochat and Taillard [21] (hereafter referred to as RT) or Taillard et al. [24] (hereafter referred to as TAI) if the best published solution was not generated by RT or TAI. We do this as RT and TAI use real, double precision distances, as opposed to some of the other methods. As also stated in [24], a consequence of using limited precision distances is that solutions found using these methods may not be feasible when higher precision distances are used to check their validity. A +, -, or = is used to indicate whether LNS bettered, could not match, or matched the best solution from RT or TAI. LNS has tied RT or TAI in 16 of the 29 cases, bettered them in 10, and not matched them in 3 of the cases. In two of these three cases, the number of vehicles could not match those generated by TAI. All new best solutions produced by LNS are available on the GreenTrip web page at http://www.math.sintef.no/GreenTrip.

in Using constraint programming and local search methods to solve vehicle routing problems
by Paul Shaw 1998
"... In PAGE 11: ...82 10 1139.82 = Table4 : Comparison of best solutions obtained against best published solutions for Solomon apos;s problem 3.2.... ..."
Cited by 86

Table 4 compares the best solutions obtained by LNS with the best published cost values. The best published results are taken from [6, 20, 21, 24, 26]. We show in the table the best published solution, and the best solution obtained by either Rochat and Taillard [21] (hereafter referred to as RT) or Taillard et al. [24] (hereafter referred to as TAI) if the best published solution was not generated by RT or TAI. We do this as RT and TAI use real, double precision distances, as opposed to some of the other methods. As also stated in [24], a consequence of using limited precision distances is that solutions found using these methods may not be feasible when higher precision distances are used to check their validity. A +, -, or = is used to indicate whether LNS bettered, could not match, or matched the best solution from RT or TAI. LNS has tied RT or TAI in 16 of the 29 cases, bettered them in 10, and not matched them in 3 of the cases. In two of these three cases, the number of vehicles could not match those generated by TAI. All new best solutions produced by LNS are available on the GreenTrip web page at http://www.math.sintef.no/GreenTrip.

in Using constraint programming and local search methods to solve vehicle routing problems
by Paul Shaw 1998
"... In PAGE 11: ...82 10 1139.82 = Table4 : Comparison of best solutions obtained against best published solutions for Solomon apos;s problem 3.2.... ..."
Cited by 86
Results 11 - 20 of 80,795