"... In PAGE 29: ... Historical and process knowledge, analogous data, knowledge of construction material, and room surveys were used to assist in identifying the substances that may be present. Table1 -2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table 1-2.... In PAGE 29: ... Table 1-2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 30: ...Rev. 1 I-13 Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 31: ...Rev. 1 I-14 The radionuclides identified in Table1 -2 were predicted for a similar reactor, 105-C (DOE-RL 1998e); from sampling data obtained by Dorian and Richards (1978); and from data obtained from the 105-C Reactor D amp;D characterization activities. The chemical COPCs are associated with reactor operations, plant process chemicals, lead caulking, electrical equipment, and process knowledge.... In PAGE 31: ... These COPCs are summarized in Table 1-3. Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ...Rev. 1 I-15 Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ... The results of the 105-C Reactor ORIGIN analysis were judged to be applicable to the 105-F and 105-DR Reactors because the reactor types are the same, the fuel was the same, and the burnup was similar. COC = contaminant of concern COPCs = contaminants of potential concern DQO = data quality objective FSB = fuel storage basin SAP = sampling and analysis plan WS = waste stream The elimination of the COPCs excluded from Table1 -3 results in a final list of COCs. The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4.... In PAGE 32: ... The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4. Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 33: ...Rev. 1 I-16 Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 34: ... The decision rules are summarized in Table 1-5. Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 35: ...Rev. 1 I-18 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 36: ...Rev. 1 I-19 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 42: ... An evaluation of the consequences of these decision errors led to the designation of the null hypotheses shown in Table 1-6. Table1 -6. Statement of the Null Hypothesis.... In PAGE 43: ...Rev. 1 I-26 The 95% UCL specified in Table1 -5 corresponds to a 5% tolerable error rate for mistakenly concluding that the action level is not exceeded. This error tolerance is applied to all of the decisions.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable decision error rates are summarized in Table 1-7. Table1 -7. Tolerable Decision Errors.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable Decision Errors. Tolerable Decision Error DS # Media COCs Parameter of Interest Range False- Positives (%) False- Negatives (%) 1a Underlying soils Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 1b Underlying soils Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2a Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3a, 4a, and 5 Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3b and 4b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+, Pb, Hg, PCBs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 520 6 Underlying soils Hg 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 N/A = not available COCs = contaminants of concern DS = decision statement PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls UCL = upper confidence level Because of the way the null hypotheses are stated in Table1 -6, the upper bound of the gray region is the DCGL or the action level. Based on the data from the 105-C Reactor technical memorandum (BHI 1999), the lower bounds of the gray region were calculated for cesium-137 and hexavalent chromium.... In PAGE 44: ... To account for overall variability (which includes analytical), the project determined that 10% over and above analytical variability would be appropriate for determining the lower bound of the gray region. The bounds of the gray region for mercury are shown in Table1 -8. The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A.... In PAGE 44: ... The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A. Table1 -8. Boundaries of the Gray Region.... In PAGE 46: ... The Stage I sampling design is based on the collection and analysis of concrete drill samples obtained from the floor of the FSB. Five random samples will be collected from the FSB and analyzed for the COCs identified in Table1 -4. The locations of the concrete samples will also serve as the sites for sodium iodide radiological surveys and to locate core holes created in the FSB floor to access the underlying soils for sampling and analysis.... In PAGE 46: ... The results of the sodium iodide radiological surveys will be evaluated with the sample data to construct a more accurate relationship between survey results and concrete contamination levels that are currently available. Table1 -9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table 1-9.... In PAGE 46: ... Table 1-9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table1 -9. Summary of the 105-DR FSB Stage I Sampling Design.... In PAGE 47: ...2.2, and a summary of the Stage II default verification sampling design for the FSB and adjunct areas is provided in Table1 -10. Table 1-10.... In PAGE 47: ...he sampling design is provided in Section 2.2.2, and a summary of the Stage II default verification sampling design for the FSB and adjunct areas is provided in Table 1-10. Table1 -10. Summary of the Stage II Default Verification Sampling Design for the FSB and Adjunct Areas.... In PAGE 51: ... A preliminary verification sampling design based on valve pit characterization data indicates a default of 10 random samples for the 105-F valve pit floors and 16 random samples from the 105-DR valve pit floors. The sampling frequency for the valve pits and other below-grade areas is shown in Table1 -11. These default values will be re-evaluated using the results of direct radiological surveys of the valve pit floors and walls.... In PAGE 51: ... Chemical constituent data will be compared with the chemical cleanup levels. Table1 -11. Default Sample Frequency for Valve Pits and Other Below-Grade Rooms and Tunnels.... In PAGE 52: ... Random sampling of the floors will follow successful completion of the direct radiological surveys. Samples will be analyzed for the contaminants identified in Table1 -4. Inorganic constituents will be analyzed where process knowledge suggests that the COCs could have been present in that room.... In PAGE 52: ... The ceilings will be removed and disposed in the ERDF. The default sampling frequency for these rooms is shown in Table1 -11. These values will be refined based on the results of the radiological surveys.... In PAGE 63: ....2.1 Radiological Survey Design All of the below-grade rooms and tunnels (except the FSB) will be initially surveyed for cesium-137 using a shielded sodium iodide detector set to detect the 662 kev gamma from cesium-137DA. The cesium-137 data obtained will be evaluated to estimate the level of contamination of all of the target radionuclides, assuming a constant ratio of the various isotopes that are the principal radiological contaminants listed in Table1 -4. The data will also be used to provide an estimate of the spatial variability of the contamination so sampling parameters for the verification sampling (discussed in Section 2.... In PAGE 67: ... Final sampling requirements will be provided in the FIG. Concrete Sample Analysis The concrete samples will be analyzed in a standard fixed laboratory for each of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. The laboratory will be required to provide assurance that the detection levels for each analyte are at or below the detection limits discussed in Table 2-1.... In PAGE 68: ... The calculated DCGL is the maximum amount of cesium-137 that may remain in the concrete while still allowing the site to meet the cleanup standard of 15 mrem/yr from all pathways and 4 mrem/yr from the groundwater pathway. Soil Sample Analysis Soil samples will be packaged, labeled, and shipped to a laboratory for analysis of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. As with the concrete samples, the laboratory data will keep any unused sample for at least 30 days after submitting for review.... In PAGE 71: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, .... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4 c N/A = not applicable.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on the inputs to this table. b 46% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on inputs to this table b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... b 31.2% of the action limit per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 82: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 96: ....25 in. of concrete floor surface) Calculated from results of Stage I radiological survey results. The numbers of samples for the default design are reported in Table1 -11. Final design values will be based on Stage I radiological survey results.... In PAGE 118: ... The dose (and DCGL) model analyses for the 105-F/105-DR Interim Safe Storage (ISS) Project used the same contaminant of concern (COC) list as the 105-C ISS Project. The COC list in Table1 -4 was used, excluding carbon-14, barium-133, technetium-99, and uranium (these isotopes were not modeled because it is not anticipated that they will be measurable in the final verification samples). The two scenarios considered were post-drilling residential and sleeping resident scenarios.... ..."

"... In PAGE 95: ... 1 III-2 3.2 SURVEYING/SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND FREQUENCIES Table3 -1 presents general surveying and sampling locations and frequencies. Detailed location information will be provided in the FIG.... In PAGE 95: ... Detailed location information will be provided in the FIG. Table3 -1. Sample and Survey Locations, Frequencies, and Sampling Methods.... In PAGE 96: ...Rev. 1 III-3 Table3 -1. Sample and Survey Locations, Frequencies, and Sampling Methods.... In PAGE 97: ...Rev. 1 III-4 Table3 -1. Sample and Survey Locations, Frequencies, and Sampling Methods.... In PAGE 98: ....2.2.1 Soils Underlying the 105-DR Fuel Storage Basin. The soils under the 105-DR FSB will be sampled through the access holes created in the FSB floor, at the depth intervals shown in Table3 -1. The first soil sample under the FSB floor will be obtained with stainless-steel hand tools.... In PAGE 98: ... Ecology may either collect split samples or request split samples be collected from the soil beneath the Sodium Fire Facility ductwork. Table3 -2a. QC Samples/Frequencies and Analytical Methods for Radiological Survey, Concrete Verification, and Soil Sampling.... In PAGE 99: ...Rev. 1 III-6 Table3 -2a. QC Samples/Frequencies and Analytical Methods for Radiological Survey, Concrete Verification, and Soil Sampling.... In PAGE 99: ... SFL/ Table 2-2 a All below-grade rooms and tunnels are considered as one area for purposes of quality control sampling. COCs = contaminants of concern FSB = fuel storage basin N/A = not applicable NaI = sodium iodide SFL = standard fixed laboratory Table3 -2b. Sampling Frequencies and Analytical Methods for Soil Excavation and Soil Site Verification.... In PAGE 99: ...5 m (15 ft) -- Deep Zone Verification sampling See 100 Areas sampling and analysis plan (DOE-RL 1998a) 3.3 SAMPLING APPROACH The sampling approaches are shown in Table3 -1. The sampling procedures to be implemented in the field shall be consistent with those below.... In PAGE 100: ...lan No. 5.3, Onsite Measurement Quality Assurance Program Plan. Table3 -3 shows the size of the decision units under consideration (as discussed in Section 1.... In PAGE 100: ... The decision unit sizes that are specified in the 100 Areas SAP (DOE-RL 1998a) will be used for the soils addressed in this SAP. Table3 -3. 105-F/105-DR Decision Unit Sizes (Below-Grade Structures).... In PAGE 101: ...Field QC sampling requirements are summarized in Table3 -2a for concrete survey, Stage I, and verification sampling. Field QC requirements for soil are summarized in Table 3-2b.... In PAGE 101: ...Field QC sampling requirements are summarized in Table 3-2a for concrete survey, Stage I, and verification sampling. Field QC requirements for soil are summarized in Table3 -2b. Details of the field QC samples and requirements are found in Section 3 of the 100 Areas SAP (DOE-RL 1998a).... In PAGE 101: ...ield and laboratory QC samples are found in Section 2.2.6.1. Table3 -4. Field and Analytical Quality Control Sampling Requirements Summary.... In PAGE 102: ...Rev. 1 III-9 Table3 -4. Field and Analytical Quality Control Sampling Requirements Summary.... ..."

"... In PAGE 95: ... 1 III-2 3.2 SURVEYING/SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND FREQUENCIES Table3 -1 presents general surveying and sampling locations and frequencies. Detailed location information will be provided in the FIG.... In PAGE 95: ... Detailed location information will be provided in the FIG. Table3 -1. Sample and Survey Locations, Frequencies, and Sampling Methods.... In PAGE 96: ...Rev. 1 III-3 Table3 -1. Sample and Survey Locations, Frequencies, and Sampling Methods.... In PAGE 97: ...Rev. 1 III-4 Table3 -1. Sample and Survey Locations, Frequencies, and Sampling Methods.... In PAGE 98: ....2.2.1 Soils Underlying the 105-DR Fuel Storage Basin. The soils under the 105-DR FSB will be sampled through the access holes created in the FSB floor, at the depth intervals shown in Table3 -1. The first soil sample under the FSB floor will be obtained with stainless-steel hand tools.... In PAGE 98: ... Ecology may either collect split samples or request split samples be collected from the soil beneath the Sodium Fire Facility ductwork. Table3 -2a. QC Samples/Frequencies and Analytical Methods for Radiological Survey, Concrete Verification, and Soil Sampling.... In PAGE 99: ...Rev. 1 III-6 Table3 -2a. QC Samples/Frequencies and Analytical Methods for Radiological Survey, Concrete Verification, and Soil Sampling.... In PAGE 99: ... SFL/ Table 2-2 a All below-grade rooms and tunnels are considered as one area for purposes of quality control sampling. COCs = contaminants of concern FSB = fuel storage basin N/A = not applicable NaI = sodium iodide SFL = standard fixed laboratory Table3 -2b. Sampling Frequencies and Analytical Methods for Soil Excavation and Soil Site Verification.... In PAGE 99: ...5 m (15 ft) -- Deep Zone Verification sampling See 100 Areas sampling and analysis plan (DOE-RL 1998a) 3.3 SAMPLING APPROACH The sampling approaches are shown in Table3 -1. The sampling procedures to be implemented in the field shall be consistent with those below.... In PAGE 100: ...lan No. 5.3, Onsite Measurement Quality Assurance Program Plan. Table3 -3 shows the size of the decision units under consideration (as discussed in Section 1.... In PAGE 101: ...Rev. 1 III-8 Table3 -3. 105-F/105-DR Decision Unit Sizes (Below-Grade Structures).... In PAGE 101: ...5 ft by 16 ft Soils adjacent to the FSB TBD Soils underlying Room 224b slab TBD 5 Soils beneath the Large Sodium Fire Facility underground duct TBD TBD = to be determined 3.4 FIELD AND LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL Field QC sampling requirements are summarized in Table3 -2a for concrete survey, Stage I, and verification sampling. Field QC requirements for soil are summarized in Table 3-2b.... In PAGE 101: ...4 FIELD AND LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL Field QC sampling requirements are summarized in Table 3-2a for concrete survey, Stage I, and verification sampling. Field QC requirements for soil are summarized in Table3 -2b. Details of the field QC samples and requirements are found in Section 3 of the 100 Areas SAP (DOE-RL 1998a).... In PAGE 101: ...ield and laboratory QC samples are found in Section 2.2.6.1. Table3 -4. Field and Analytical Quality Control Sampling Requirements Summary.... In PAGE 102: ...Rev. 1 III-9 Table3 -4. Field and Analytical Quality Control Sampling Requirements Summary.... ..."

"... In PAGE 21: ...Rev. 1 I-4 Table1 -1. Phase III 105-F/105-DR Below-Grade Areas.... In PAGE 29: ... Historical and process knowledge, analogous data, knowledge of construction material, and room surveys were used to assist in identifying the substances that may be present. Table1 -2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table 1-2.... In PAGE 29: ... Table 1-2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 30: ...Rev. 1 I-13 Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 31: ...Rev. 1 I-14 The radionuclides identified in Table1 -2 were predicted for a similar reactor, 105-C (DOE-RL 1998e); from sampling data obtained by Dorian and Richards (1978); and from data obtained from the 105-C Reactor D amp;D characterization activities. The chemical COPCs are associated with reactor operations, plant process chemicals, lead caulking, electrical equipment, and process knowledge.... In PAGE 31: ... These COPCs are summarized in Table 1-3. Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ...Rev. 1 I-15 Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ... The results of the 105-C Reactor ORIGIN analysis were judged to be applicable to the 105-F and 105-DR Reactors because the reactor types are the same, the fuel was the same, and the burnup was similar. COC = contaminant of concern COPCs = contaminants of potential concern DQO = data quality objective FSB = fuel storage basin SAP = sampling and analysis plan WS = waste stream The elimination of the COPCs excluded from Table1 -3 results in a final list of COCs. The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4.... In PAGE 32: ... The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4. Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 33: ...Rev. 1 I-16 Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 34: ... The decision rules are summarized in Table 1-5. Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 35: ...Rev. 1 I-18 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 36: ...Rev. 1 I-19 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 42: ... An evaluation of the consequences of these decision errors led to the designation of the null hypotheses shown in Table 1-6. Table1 -6. Statement of the Null Hypothesis.... In PAGE 43: ...Rev. 1 I-26 The 95% UCL specified in Table1 -5 corresponds to a 5% tolerable error rate for mistakenly concluding that the action level is not exceeded. This error tolerance is applied to all of the decisions.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable decision error rates are summarized in Table 1-7. Table1 -7. Tolerable Decision Errors.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable Decision Errors. Tolerable Decision Error DS # Media COCs Parameter of Interest Range False- Positives (%) False- Negatives (%) 1a Underlying soils Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 1b Underlying soils Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2a Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3a, 4a, and 5 Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3b and 4b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+, Pb, Hg, PCBs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 520 6 Underlying soils Hg 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 N/A = not available COCs = contaminants of concern DS = decision statement PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls UCL = upper confidence level Because of the way the null hypotheses are stated in Table1 -6, the upper bound of the gray region is the DCGL or the action level. Based on the data from the 105-C Reactor technical memorandum (BHI 1999), the lower bounds of the gray region were calculated for cesium-137 and hexavalent chromium.... In PAGE 44: ... To account for overall variability (which includes analytical), the project determined that 10% over and above analytical variability would be appropriate for determining the lower bound of the gray region. The bounds of the gray region for mercury are shown in Table1 -8. The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A.... In PAGE 44: ... The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A. Table1 -8. Boundaries of the Gray Region.... In PAGE 46: ... The Stage I sampling design is based on the collection and analysis of concrete drill samples obtained from the floor of the FSB. Five random samples will be collected from the FSB and analyzed for the COCs identified in Table1 -4. The locations of the concrete samples will also serve as the sites for sodium iodide radiological surveys and to locate core holes created in the FSB floor to access the underlying soils for sampling and analysis.... In PAGE 46: ... The results of the sodium iodide radiological surveys will be evaluated with the sample data to construct a more accurate relationship between survey results and concrete contamination levels that are currently available. Table1 -9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table 1-9.... In PAGE 46: ... Table 1-9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table1 -9. Summary of the 105-DR FSB Stage I Sampling Design.... In PAGE 47: ...2.2, and a summary of the Stage II default verification sampling design for the FSB and adjunct areas is provided in Table1 -10. Table 1-10.... In PAGE 47: ...he sampling design is provided in Section 2.2.2, and a summary of the Stage II default verification sampling design for the FSB and adjunct areas is provided in Table 1-10. Table1 -10. Summary of the Stage II Default Verification Sampling Design for the FSB and Adjunct Areas.... In PAGE 51: ... A preliminary verification sampling design based on valve pit characterization data indicates a default of 10 random samples for the 105-F valve pit floors and 16 random samples from the 105-DR valve pit floors. The sampling frequency for the valve pits and other below-grade areas is shown in Table1 -11. These default values will be re-evaluated using the results of direct radiological surveys of the valve pit floors and walls.... In PAGE 52: ... Random sampling of the floors will follow successful completion of the direct radiological surveys. Samples will be analyzed for the contaminants identified in Table1 -4. Inorganic constituents will be analyzed where process knowledge suggests that the COCs could have been present in that room.... In PAGE 52: ... The ceilings will be removed and disposed in the ERDF. The default sampling frequency for these rooms is shown in Table1 -11. These values will be refined based on the results of the radiological surveys.... In PAGE 63: ....2.1 Radiological Survey Design All of the below-grade rooms and tunnels (except the FSB) will be initially surveyed for cesium-137 using a shielded sodium iodide detector set to detect the 662 kev gamma from cesium-137DA. The cesium-137 data obtained will be evaluated to estimate the level of contamination of all of the target radionuclides, assuming a constant ratio of the various isotopes that are the principal radiological contaminants listed in Table1 -4. The data will also be used to provide an estimate of the spatial variability of the contamination so sampling parameters for the verification sampling (discussed in Section 2.... In PAGE 67: ... Final sampling requirements will be provided in the FIG. Concrete Sample Analysis The concrete samples will be analyzed in a standard fixed laboratory for each of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. The laboratory will be required to provide assurance that the detection levels for each analyte are at or below the detection limits discussed in Table 2-1.... In PAGE 68: ... The calculated DCGL is the maximum amount of cesium-137 that may remain in the concrete while still allowing the site to meet the cleanup standard of 15 mrem/yr from all pathways and 4 mrem/yr from the groundwater pathway. Soil Sample Analysis Soil samples will be packaged, labeled, and shipped to a laboratory for analysis of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. As with the concrete samples, the laboratory data will keep any unused sample for at least 30 days after submitting for review.... In PAGE 71: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, .... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4 c N/A = not applicable.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on the inputs to this table. b 46% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on inputs to this table b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... b 31.2% of the action limit per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 82: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 96: ....25 in. of concrete floor surface) Calculated from results of Stage I radiological survey results. The numbers of samples for the default design are reported in Table1 -11. Final design values will be based on Stage I radiological survey results.... In PAGE 118: ... The dose (and DCGL) model analyses for the 105-F/105-DR Interim Safe Storage (ISS) Project used the same contaminant of concern (COC) list as the 105-C ISS Project. The COC list in Table1 -4 was used, excluding carbon-14, barium-133, technetium-99, and uranium (these isotopes were not modeled because it is not anticipated that they will be measurable in the final verification samples). The two scenarios considered were post-drilling residential and sleeping resident scenarios.... ..."

"... In PAGE 21: ...Rev. 1 I-4 Table1 -1. Phase III 105-F/105-DR Below-Grade Areas.... In PAGE 29: ... Historical and process knowledge, analogous data, knowledge of construction material, and room surveys were used to assist in identifying the substances that may be present. Table1 -2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table 1-2.... In PAGE 29: ... Table 1-2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 30: ...Rev. 1 I-13 Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 31: ...Rev. 1 I-14 The radionuclides identified in Table1 -2 were predicted for a similar reactor, 105-C (DOE-RL 1998e); from sampling data obtained by Dorian and Richards (1978); and from data obtained from the 105-C Reactor D amp;D characterization activities. The chemical COPCs are associated with reactor operations, plant process chemicals, lead caulking, electrical equipment, and process knowledge.... In PAGE 31: ... These COPCs are summarized in Table 1-3. Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ...Rev. 1 I-15 Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ... The results of the 105-C Reactor ORIGIN analysis were judged to be applicable to the 105-F and 105-DR Reactors because the reactor types are the same, the fuel was the same, and the burnup was similar. COC = contaminant of concern COPCs = contaminants of potential concern DQO = data quality objective FSB = fuel storage basin SAP = sampling and analysis plan WS = waste stream The elimination of the COPCs excluded from Table1 -3 results in a final list of COCs. The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4.... In PAGE 32: ... The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4. Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 33: ...Rev. 1 I-16 Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 34: ... The decision rules are summarized in Table 1-5. Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 35: ...Rev. 1 I-18 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 36: ...Rev. 1 I-19 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 43: ...Rev. 1 I-26 The 95% UCL specified in Table1 -5 corresponds to a 5% tolerable error rate for mistakenly concluding that the action level is not exceeded. This error tolerance is applied to all of the decisions.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable decision error rates are summarized in Table 1-7. Table1 -7. Tolerable Decision Errors.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable Decision Errors. Tolerable Decision Error DS # Media COCs Parameter of Interest Range False- Positives (%) False- Negatives (%) 1a Underlying soils Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 1b Underlying soils Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2a Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3a, 4a, and 5 Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3b and 4b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+, Pb, Hg, PCBs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 520 6 Underlying soils Hg 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 N/A = not available COCs = contaminants of concern DS = decision statement PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls UCL = upper confidence level Because of the way the null hypotheses are stated in Table1 -6, the upper bound of the gray region is the DCGL or the action level. Based on the data from the 105-C Reactor technical memorandum (BHI 1999), the lower bounds of the gray region were calculated for cesium-137 and hexavalent chromium.... In PAGE 44: ... To account for overall variability (which includes analytical), the project determined that 10% over and above analytical variability would be appropriate for determining the lower bound of the gray region. The bounds of the gray region for mercury are shown in Table1 -8. The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A.... In PAGE 44: ... The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A. Table1 -8. Boundaries of the Gray Region.... In PAGE 46: ... The Stage I sampling design is based on the collection and analysis of concrete drill samples obtained from the floor of the FSB. Five random samples will be collected from the FSB and analyzed for the COCs identified in Table1 -4. The locations of the concrete samples will also serve as the sites for sodium iodide radiological surveys and to locate core holes created in the FSB floor to access the underlying soils for sampling and analysis.... In PAGE 46: ... The results of the sodium iodide radiological surveys will be evaluated with the sample data to construct a more accurate relationship between survey results and concrete contamination levels that are currently available. Table1 -9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table 1-9.... In PAGE 46: ... Table 1-9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table1 -9. Summary of the 105-DR FSB Stage I Sampling Design.... In PAGE 47: ...2.2, and a summary of the Stage II default verification sampling design for the FSB and adjunct areas is provided in Table1 -10. Table 1-10.... In PAGE 47: ...he sampling design is provided in Section 2.2.2, and a summary of the Stage II default verification sampling design for the FSB and adjunct areas is provided in Table 1-10. Table1 -10. Summary of the Stage II Default Verification Sampling Design for the FSB and Adjunct Areas.... In PAGE 51: ... A preliminary verification sampling design based on valve pit characterization data indicates a default of 10 random samples for the 105-F valve pit floors and 16 random samples from the 105-DR valve pit floors. The sampling frequency for the valve pits and other below-grade areas is shown in Table1 -11. These default values will be re-evaluated using the results of direct radiological surveys of the valve pit floors and walls.... In PAGE 51: ... Chemical constituent data will be compared with the chemical cleanup levels. Table1 -11. Default Sample Frequency for Valve Pits and Other Below-Grade Rooms and Tunnels.... In PAGE 52: ... Random sampling of the floors will follow successful completion of the direct radiological surveys. Samples will be analyzed for the contaminants identified in Table1 -4. Inorganic constituents will be analyzed where process knowledge suggests that the COCs could have been present in that room.... In PAGE 52: ... The ceilings will be removed and disposed in the ERDF. The default sampling frequency for these rooms is shown in Table1 -11. These values will be refined based on the results of the radiological surveys.... In PAGE 63: ....2.1 Radiological Survey Design All of the below-grade rooms and tunnels (except the FSB) will be initially surveyed for cesium-137 using a shielded sodium iodide detector set to detect the 662 kev gamma from cesium-137DA. The cesium-137 data obtained will be evaluated to estimate the level of contamination of all of the target radionuclides, assuming a constant ratio of the various isotopes that are the principal radiological contaminants listed in Table1 -4. The data will also be used to provide an estimate of the spatial variability of the contamination so sampling parameters for the verification sampling (discussed in Section 2.... In PAGE 67: ... Final sampling requirements will be provided in the FIG. Concrete Sample Analysis The concrete samples will be analyzed in a standard fixed laboratory for each of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. The laboratory will be required to provide assurance that the detection levels for each analyte are at or below the detection limits discussed in Table 2-1.... In PAGE 68: ... The calculated DCGL is the maximum amount of cesium-137 that may remain in the concrete while still allowing the site to meet the cleanup standard of 15 mrem/yr from all pathways and 4 mrem/yr from the groundwater pathway. Soil Sample Analysis Soil samples will be packaged, labeled, and shipped to a laboratory for analysis of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. As with the concrete samples, the laboratory data will keep any unused sample for at least 30 days after submitting for review.... In PAGE 71: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, .... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4 c N/A = not applicable.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on the inputs to this table. b 46% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on inputs to this table b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... b 31.2% of the action limit per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 82: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 96: ....25 in. of concrete floor surface) Calculated from results of Stage I radiological survey results. The numbers of samples for the default design are reported in Table1 -11. Final design values will be based on Stage I radiological survey results.... In PAGE 118: ... The dose (and DCGL) model analyses for the 105-F/105-DR Interim Safe Storage (ISS) Project used the same contaminant of concern (COC) list as the 105-C ISS Project. The COC list in Table1 -4 was used, excluding carbon-14, barium-133, technetium-99, and uranium (these isotopes were not modeled because it is not anticipated that they will be measurable in the final verification samples). The two scenarios considered were post-drilling residential and sleeping resident scenarios.... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ... Further, the linear mapping f 7! f maps a minimal left ideal either onto 0 or onto an equi- valent minimal left ideal. In Table1 we have listed the rst values of the dimensions dr ; ^ dr ; dr ; lr. Since these dimensions are monotonically increasing functions of r and I(r) has a subideal of dimension dr for all r 1, we read from Table 1 that for r 4 subideals of dimensions ^ dr ; dr can not occur in I(r).... In PAGE 13: ... In Table 1 we have listed the rst values of the dimensions dr ; ^ dr ; dr ; lr. Since these dimensions are monotonically increasing functions of r and I(r) has a subideal of dimension dr for all r 1, we read from Table1 that for r 4 subideals of dimensions ^ dr ; dr can not occur in I(r). Moreover, for r = 3 a subideal of I(r) of dimension ^ d3 = 35 is impossible.... ..."

"... In PAGE 21: ...Rev. 1 I-4 Table1 -1. Phase III 105-F/105-DR Below-Grade Areas.... In PAGE 29: ... Historical and process knowledge, analogous data, knowledge of construction material, and room surveys were used to assist in identifying the substances that may be present. Table1 -2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table 1-2.... In PAGE 29: ... Table 1-2 provides a master list of the COPCs. Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 30: ...Rev. 1 I-13 Table1 -2. Sources of Contamination, COPCs, and Affected Media.... In PAGE 31: ...Rev. 1 I-14 The radionuclides identified in Table1 -2 were predicted for a similar reactor, 105-C (DOE-RL 1998e); from sampling data obtained by Dorian and Richards (1978); and from data obtained from the 105-C Reactor D amp;D characterization activities. The chemical COPCs are associated with reactor operations, plant process chemicals, lead caulking, electrical equipment, and process knowledge.... In PAGE 31: ... These COPCs are summarized in Table 1-3. Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ...Rev. 1 I-15 Table1 -3. COPCs/Waste Stream Exclusions and Justifications.... In PAGE 32: ... The results of the 105-C Reactor ORIGIN analysis were judged to be applicable to the 105-F and 105-DR Reactors because the reactor types are the same, the fuel was the same, and the burnup was similar. COC = contaminant of concern COPCs = contaminants of potential concern DQO = data quality objective FSB = fuel storage basin SAP = sampling and analysis plan WS = waste stream The elimination of the COPCs excluded from Table1 -3 results in a final list of COCs. The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4.... In PAGE 32: ... The final list and associated rationale for inclusion are summarized in Table 1-4. Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 33: ...Rev. 1 I-16 Table1 -4. Final COC List.... In PAGE 34: ... The decision rules are summarized in Table 1-5. Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 35: ...Rev. 1 I-18 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 36: ...Rev. 1 I-19 Table1 -5. Decision Rules.... In PAGE 42: ... An evaluation of the consequences of these decision errors led to the designation of the null hypotheses shown in Table 1-6. Table1 -6. Statement of the Null Hypothesis.... In PAGE 43: ...Rev. 1 I-26 The 95% UCL specified in Table1 -5 corresponds to a 5% tolerable error rate for mistakenly concluding that the action level is not exceeded. This error tolerance is applied to all of the decisions.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable decision error rates are summarized in Table 1-7. Table1 -7. Tolerable Decision Errors.... In PAGE 43: ... Tolerable Decision Errors. Tolerable Decision Error DS # Media COCs Parameter of Interest Range False- Positives (%) False- Negatives (%) 1a Underlying soils Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 1b Underlying soils Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2a Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 2b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+ 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3a, 4a, and 5 Volumetrically contaminated concrete Radiological COCs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 3b and 4b Volumetrically contaminated concrete Cr6+, Pb, Hg, PCBs 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 520 6 Underlying soils Hg 95% UCL for the mean concentration N/A 5 20 N/A = not available COCs = contaminants of concern DS = decision statement PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls UCL = upper confidence level Because of the way the null hypotheses are stated in Table1 -6, the upper bound of the gray region is the DCGL or the action level. Based on the data from the 105-C Reactor technical memorandum (BHI 1999), the lower bounds of the gray region were calculated for cesium-137 and hexavalent chromium.... In PAGE 44: ... To account for overall variability (which includes analytical), the project determined that 10% over and above analytical variability would be appropriate for determining the lower bound of the gray region. The bounds of the gray region for mercury are shown in Table1 -8. The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A.... In PAGE 44: ... The formula for converting RPD to RSD is provided in Appendix A. Table1 -8. Boundaries of the Gray Region.... In PAGE 46: ... The Stage I sampling design is based on the collection and analysis of concrete drill samples obtained from the floor of the FSB. Five random samples will be collected from the FSB and analyzed for the COCs identified in Table1 -4. The locations of the concrete samples will also serve as the sites for sodium iodide radiological surveys and to locate core holes created in the FSB floor to access the underlying soils for sampling and analysis.... In PAGE 46: ... The results of the sodium iodide radiological surveys will be evaluated with the sample data to construct a more accurate relationship between survey results and concrete contamination levels that are currently available. Table1 -9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table 1-9.... In PAGE 46: ... Table 1-9 provides summary information on the Stage I sampling design for the 105-DR FSB. Table1 -9. Summary of the 105-DR FSB Stage I Sampling Design.... In PAGE 47: ...2.2, and a summary of the Stage II default verification sampling design for the FSB and adjunct areas is provided in Table1 -10. Table 1-10.... In PAGE 51: ... A preliminary verification sampling design based on valve pit characterization data indicates a default of 10 random samples for the 105-F valve pit floors and 16 random samples from the 105-DR valve pit floors. The sampling frequency for the valve pits and other below-grade areas is shown in Table1 -11. These default values will be re-evaluated using the results of direct radiological surveys of the valve pit floors and walls.... In PAGE 51: ... Chemical constituent data will be compared with the chemical cleanup levels. Table1 -11. Default Sample Frequency for Valve Pits and Other Below-Grade Rooms and Tunnels.... In PAGE 52: ... Random sampling of the floors will follow successful completion of the direct radiological surveys. Samples will be analyzed for the contaminants identified in Table1 -4. Inorganic constituents will be analyzed where process knowledge suggests that the COCs could have been present in that room.... In PAGE 52: ... The ceilings will be removed and disposed in the ERDF. The default sampling frequency for these rooms is shown in Table1 -11. These values will be refined based on the results of the radiological surveys.... In PAGE 63: ....2.1 Radiological Survey Design All of the below-grade rooms and tunnels (except the FSB) will be initially surveyed for cesium-137 using a shielded sodium iodide detector set to detect the 662 kev gamma from cesium-137DA. The cesium-137 data obtained will be evaluated to estimate the level of contamination of all of the target radionuclides, assuming a constant ratio of the various isotopes that are the principal radiological contaminants listed in Table1 -4. The data will also be used to provide an estimate of the spatial variability of the contamination so sampling parameters for the verification sampling (discussed in Section 2.... In PAGE 67: ... Final sampling requirements will be provided in the FIG. Concrete Sample Analysis The concrete samples will be analyzed in a standard fixed laboratory for each of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. The laboratory will be required to provide assurance that the detection levels for each analyte are at or below the detection limits discussed in Table 2-1.... In PAGE 68: ... The calculated DCGL is the maximum amount of cesium-137 that may remain in the concrete while still allowing the site to meet the cleanup standard of 15 mrem/yr from all pathways and 4 mrem/yr from the groundwater pathway. Soil Sample Analysis Soil samples will be packaged, labeled, and shipped to a laboratory for analysis of the COCs listed in Table1 -4. As with the concrete samples, the laboratory data will keep any unused sample for at least 30 days after submitting for review.... In PAGE 71: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 72: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, .... In PAGE 73: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 74: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4 c N/A = not applicable.... In PAGE 75: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 76: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 77: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 78: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 79: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on the inputs to this table. b 46% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 80: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... After survey data are collected, the number of samples will be updated based on inputs to this table b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 81: ... b 31.2% of the action limit per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 82: ... b 45.6% of the DCGL per Table1 -8, which is found in Section 1.4.... In PAGE 96: ....25 in. of concrete floor surface) Calculated from results of Stage I radiological survey results. The numbers of samples for the default design are reported in Table1 -11. Final design values will be based on Stage I radiological survey results.... In PAGE 118: ... The dose (and DCGL) model analyses for the 105-F/105-DR Interim Safe Storage (ISS) Project used the same contaminant of concern (COC) list as the 105-C ISS Project. The COC list in Table1 -4 was used, excluding carbon-14, barium-133, technetium-99, and uranium (these isotopes were not modeled because it is not anticipated that they will be measurable in the final verification samples). The two scenarios considered were post-drilling residential and sleeping resident scenarios.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... Hence, dr signals the amount of uncertainty as to the identity of the stimulus originating the response. Table9 reports the values of ds and dr for the various FACES*CONDITIONS combinations. Table 9.... ..."