"... In PAGE 4: ... The first component identified consisted of 14 items, describing mainly oppositional behavior problems, as they reflect hostile, negativistic and defiant behaviors (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). It also con- tained a few items that describe loud, dominant, but not necessarily oppositional behavior (see Table1 ). This factor will be referred to as relational aggression.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... It is clear from these results that the fittest structures correspond to the correct chain fold. As listed in Table2 , the initial GA step produced correct chain folds in 55% of independent calculations, while a further 10% of calculations had folds that were close to correct (i.e.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ...orrect (i.e., typically a loop was displaced or part of the chain ran the wrong side of another part of the protein); after a simulated annealing (SA) refinement of the GA structures, all of the struc- tures had the correct chain fold. Table3 lists the RMSD to the crystal structure (i.e.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... The efficiency of leukocytes is not only evidenced by their presence in blood, but, first of all, by their quality and ability to actively participate in defensive processes in the organisms. The attempt of evaluation of heterophils efficiency in chicken was undertaken using the test of yeast cells phagocytosis ( Table2 ). Contrary to common expectations, it turned out that ten and twenty days of OA administration the percentage of heterophils containing yeast cells did increase from 17,6% in the group I to 26,7% and to 37% in both experimental groups.... In PAGE 3: ...t al., 2003). RS inhibition rate seems to be dependent on the time of ochratoxin activity. Although RS was noticeable in 11,4% of control group I, after 10 days its level decreased to 10,3% and then to 8% after 20 days ( Table2 ). This ochratoxin shows a diversified effect on different populations of blood leukocytes, since it induces an increase in heterophils phagocytic activity, and the same time, a decrease in lymphocytes ability to form radial segmentation of their nuclei, which exemplifies structural and functional differences of those cells.... ..."

"... In PAGE 19: ... This is to be expected. In order to summarize the bene t we give a comparison of the best conservative result and the best aggressive result for each benchmark in Table8 . Note the added bene t of the aggressive approach is quite signi cant, particularly for the speech and eqntott benchmarks.... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ... However, it works very well in practice. A comparison between the results with aggressive skip and without aggressive skip (namely, full search) is provided in Table4 . The column 0Gap0 presents the percentage gap between the two results.... In PAGE 16: ...TheGap is less than 0.3% for all the tests in Table4 . However, it can be seen, the computational time for the aggressive skip is much shorter than for the full search.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... Loops accounted for increases in gcc, go, li and perl. Table1 displays statistics from the conservative and aggressive speculation of those tasks which exceed our thresholds. The average overlap is that part of the average task length that can be overlapped with other execution.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... The rationale behind these methods is that any change in the nearest neighbor from the full dimensionality leads to loss of information; the rationale behind our approachistobe aggressive in removing the dimensions whichhavelow co- herence as noise; thus, on an overall basis the aggressiveness of a dimensionality reduction process which uses the coher- ence probability of the dimensions may lead to very low precision with respect to the original data but much higher e#0Bectiveness and coherence. In order to illustrate our point, wehave indicated #28in Table1 #29 the prediction accuracy us- ing a 1#25-thresholding technique in which only those eigen- values which are less than 1#25 of the largest eigenvalue are discarded. This prediction accuracy is typically very close to the full dimensional accuracy and is signi#0Ccantly lower than the optimal accuracy for all 3 data sets #28as illustrated in the accuracy charts of Figures 5, 8, 11#29.... In PAGE 10: ... Thus, such a drastic reduction in dimensionality does not attempt to mirror the original nearest neighbors in the data; but rather improves their qualityby removing the noise e#0Bects in high dimensionality. It is also clear from Table1 that the opti- mal accuracy dimensionality is signi#0Ccantly lower than the 1#25-thresholding method. In fact, the dimensionality for the 1#25-thresholding method is quite close to the full dimension- ality.... ..."