"... In PAGE 4: ... The sources vary as to the extent of formalization. The set of usability-related activities proposed in the HCI field are detailed in Table1 , where sources follow an order of increasing formalization from left to right. We have analyzed the activities proposed by the different authors in order to extract the common ones or, at least, the activities that are at the same abstraction level and are common to several sources.... In PAGE 5: ...The resulting usability activities (the left column in Table1 ) are represented in Fig. 1, grouped according to the generic kind of activity to which they belong: Analy- sis, design or evaluation.... ..."

"... In PAGE 23: ... As before, we again conducted hypothesis tests using DEA-based heuristics proposed by Banker (1993) to validate these findings. (See Table6 .) ... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ... Subcharacteristics of Reliability in Systemic Quality dimensions RELIABILITY Dimension Product Effectiveness Product Efficiency Product Maturity, Fault Tolerance, Recoverability Correctness, Structured, Encapsulated Process Audit, Quality Management Operational Use, Integration and testing, Maintenance, Audit, Quality Management Usability is the capacity of a software product to be attractive, understood, learned and used by the user under certain specific conditions. Table4 shows the subcharacteristics associated with Usability, grouped by dimension. Table 4.... ..."

"... In PAGE 27: ... It benefits me conducting the research because I understand more about the website design. Additionally, other graduate students in the project (See Table1 ) and I proofread the content of the site for two times weekly. Each student was responsible for two lessons in order to unify the punctuation of English and Chinese versions and check the accuracy of the word descriptions and sound track of each lesson, dictionary, and grammar section.... In PAGE 72: ... The cause of the situation was supposed that they seldom used the two Yami skills in the daily life and classroom. Spelling was the common learning difficulty for all of them ( Table1 4). Table 14.... ..."

"... In PAGE 22: ... For purposes of the present discussion, we give examples of potential work in each realm, without careful distinction among the different modalities. Table1 summarizes six areas of potential investigation on the systems development process, using the format of Figure 1 presented earlier. 4.... In PAGE 22: ... In examining the activities of systems development, the structuration framework alerts us to the institutional context that contains these roles. Systems developers do not act in a vacuum, but are influenced by factors such as their current state of knowledge, the resources available to them, the objectives of their managers, and the organizational form and culture (see top half of Table1 ). Research into systems development can focus on how systems developers and participating users draw on their organization apos;s institutionalized structures of signification, domination, and legitimation to do their work.... In PAGE 24: ... Thus, information systems are the product of social action. Research that focuses on the process used by development workers to create designs could draw from the structuration framework to focus specifically on the interpretive schemes, resources, and norms used by developers to constitute new information systems (see bottom half of Table1 ). For 24 _ __ __1_ ... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... The scenario tasks are representative of realistic tasks and cover all systems func- tionality. Table1 lists two of the scenarios used in the evaluation. Each scenario was design to utilise and test certain functionalities of the X.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ... The scenario tasks are representative of realistic tasks and cover all systems func- tionality. Table1 lists two of the scenarios used in the evaluation. Each scenario was design to utilise and test certain functionalities of the X.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... Other variables, such as Concentration Level, Use of L1 Translation, and Student Anxiety, were the subject of investigation in one study only. These appear in Table3 as Other . (Appendix A gives the most detailed overview).... In PAGE 6: ... This is not surprising since teaching methods and technologies have changed in a way that no longer allows for easy numeric measurement of outcomes. If we look at the 16 studies that investigate writing (see Table 2), for instance, 9 deal with writing quality (see Table3 ) and are spread fairly evenly across the spectrum of research designs. While it is not the scope here to synthesize these results, it was our intention to provide opportunities for this.... In PAGE 6: ... Building up a body of clustered research results of this nature ought to give more detailed insights into the impact of ICT on any particular process or outcome. Looking down the list of variables in Table3 and Appendix A shows that there is a distinctly higher percentage of investigations concerned with quality and process measures than with quantity. This trend is also reported by Hoven (2004).... In PAGE 7: ... This often leads to duplications of efforts when building on and incorporating existing findings would advance the field more substantially. It is most surprising to find a statement such as the following when investigating student perceptions of CALL represents the largest area of activity to date (see Table3 ). In spite of the widespread use of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) and its perceived facilitative role in second language (L2) learning, there is little data on how learners feel, experience, or think about CALL in the L2 learning context.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... Tech- niques that are in the same row refer to the same basic technique. The possibility of variants of some techniques is also considered; and then the general technique and each of the variants have their corresponding rows (for example, Table4 shows the Thinking Aloud technique along with four of its variants). The tables also show the selected as candidate techniques.... In PAGE 10: ... Analysis techniques are summarized in Table 2, and design techniques in Table 3. Evaluation techniques are summarized in four tables: Table4 presents techniques for usability testing, Table 5 for expert reviews, Table 6 for follow-up studies of in- stalled systems and, finally, Table 7 summarizes the rest of usability evaluation tech- niques. Table 5.... ..."