Results 11 - 20 of 96,940

Table 1. Approaches in (Semantic) Web information retrieval

in Sindice.com: Weaving the open linked data
by Giovanni Tummarello, Renaud Delbru, Eyal Oren 2007
"... In PAGE 12: ... Finally, none of these engines provide indexing based on \linked data quot; paradigm reasoning, SPARQL endpoint indexing and the ability to index large repositories consciously through the Sitemap extention. Table1 shows an overall comparison of our approach against on the one hand traditional Web search engines such as Google or Yahoo! and on the other hand Semantic Web (SW) search engines such as SWSE or Swoogle. Whereas tradi- tional Web search focuses on document retrieval for HTML documents, and SW search focuses on building a global database of retrieved triples, we provide a doc- ument retrieval service for RDF documents.... ..."
Cited by 2

Table 1: Semantic web services infrastructure dimensions

in Objectives
by Responsible J. P. Barthès, C. Moulin (utc
"... In PAGE 33: ... The architecture of SWS describes the components needed for accomplishing the activities defined for SWS. The service ontology defines all concepts models and relations for the description of a semantic web service (see Table1 ). The service ontology essentially integrates the information that has been defined by web services standards (UDDI and WSDL) at the knowledge level.... ..."

Table 1. Traditional and Semantic Web data

in Workshop Co-Chairs ’ Message SFSW 2007- Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 23: ...Q1 dc:subject=dummy Q2 dc:title=NM2 Q3 dc:title= Q4 geo:location=athens Q5 dc:dummy=test (empty match) Table1 . Query Types Note, that more than 80% of the photos were tagged with dc:subject=dummy, hence Q1 exhibits an exception.... In PAGE 55: ... While the Semantic Web is data-oriented and the World Wide Web is docu- ment-oriented, both are fundamentally decentralised, heterogeneous, and open: anyone can make any statement at any location, using any vocabulary or struc- ture. In contrast, as shown in Table1 , traditional database-driven Web appli- cations are typically centralised, with a fixed schema, a fixed vocabulary and a... ..."

Table 9: Semantic web technology maturity (Reference)

in Editors Prof Chris Cooper University of Queensland Editor-in-Chief
by Nalin Sharda, Mladen Georgievski, Imran Ahmed, Leisa J. Armstrong, Mark Brogan, Andrew Woodward, Gurpreet Kohli, Martha Clark, Prof Terry, De Lacy, Sustainable Tourism, Crc Chief Executive, Prof Leo, Jago Sustainable, Tourism Crc
"... In PAGE 5: ...LEADING-EDGE DEVELOPMENTS IN TOURISM ICT AND v Figure 19: Simulated Gui Interface For Testing Various Puis ______________________________________ 50 Figure 20: Traditional Usability Laboratory: (A) Photograph Of The Participant Room, (B) Laboratory Configuration ___________________________________________________________________________ 51 Figure 21: Monitoring System Screen Capture__________________________________________________ 51 Figure 22: New Usability Laboratory Setup: (A) Photograph Of The Participant Room, (B) Laboratory Configuration ___________________________________________________________________________ 53 Figure 23: Task Completion Time Logging Screen ______________________________________________ 53 Figure 24: Comparison Of The Task Completion Times For The Traditional And Re-Engineered Usability Testing Approach ________________________________________________________________________ 55 Figure 25: Comparison Of The Error Count For The Traditional And Re-Engineered Usability Testing Approach_______________________________________________________________________________ 55 Figure 26: Usability Testing Laboratory At Victoria University (A) Photograph Of The Participant Room, (B) Overall Laboratory Configuration____________________________________________________________ 57 Figure 27: Lab-In-A-Box Set-Up (Reproduced With Permission)___________________________________ 61 Figure 28: Mobile Usability Testing (Must). A) For Onsite Testing, B) Offsite Location Setup For The Facilitator And The Participant, C) Offsite Setup For The Observer _________________________________ 62 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Some Themes In Tourism Ontology And Corresponding Terms______________________________ 7 Table 2: Applications For Travel And Hospitality _______________________________________________ 16 Table 3: Survey Scenario And Results ________________________________________________________ 17 Table 4: Challenges And Limitation For Mobile Guides __________________________________________ 18 Table 5: Survey Results ___________________________________________________________________ 19 Table 6: Push / Pull Notifications For Each Application __________________________________________ 20 Table 7: First-Generation Ict In Tourism (Gds/Other) ____________________________________________ 25 Table 8: Travel Portal Software Architecture (Reference) _________________________________________ 30 Table9 : Semantic Web Technology Maturity (Reference) ________________________________________ 34 Table 10: Cost Of Mobile Equipment Required For A Mobile Usability Testing (Must) Facility___________ 62 Table 11: Cost Of Other Equipment Required For A Mobile Usability Testing (Must) Facility ____________ 63 ... ..."

Table 1. Applicability of Semantic Web and Agents technologies

in Semantic security in service oriented environments
by Mike Surridge, Steve J. Taylor, E. Rowland Watkins, Thomas Leonard, et al. 2006
Cited by 1

Table 1 Opportunities and challenges of the Semantic Web in healthcare

in The Semantic Web and . . .
by Gunther Eysenbach

Table 1: Semantic Web namespace table

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2006

TABLE I PARAMETER VALUES: THREE-STATE MODELS x 2.016

in unknown title
by unknown authors 1993
Cited by 12

Table 2: Semantics of Various When Constructs After the sending out the message (line 12), two when constructs (line 17 and 21) will run con- currently waiting for a reply or a timeout respectively. If a reply is received, the bundle returns. If a timeout occurs the original message is sent again. Such retry continues until either a reply is received, or the number of retries exceeds the limit MAX RETRY. In the later case, the bundle returns with an error. All the functions with pre x name \CC quot; are provided by the Cicero communication library, and their functionality is brie y described in Table 3. Function Description

in Designing an Agent Synthesis System for Cross RPC Communication
by Yen-Min Huang, Chinya V. Ravishankar 1994
"... In PAGE 16: ... The correspondence between the Cicero code segment and the original speci cation is indicated within the comments of the code segment. Also, Table2 is provided to describe the semantics of various event syntax associated with the when constructs in the Cicero code segments. 1 bundle client_rpc(CC_handle_t handle, CC_msg_t *msg)(;) 2 { 3 int err_code; 4 long wait_time; 5 event recv_msg, wait, retry; 6 7 when (INIT): /* FSM: start - gt; wait */ 8 { 9 wait_time = 60; /* wait for 60 sec.... ..."
Cited by 11

Table 1. Process for deriving semantic content from web services.

in Semantic Transformation of Web Services
by David Bell, Sergio De Cesare, Mark Lycett 2005
"... In PAGE 4: ... 3.2 Framework Process and Artifacts The process, which drives the discovery and representation of semantic content from technical web services, is summarized in Table1 . The process is iterative and its out- come (defined in terms of ontological models) outlives one specific reengineering project.... ..."
Cited by 3
Results 11 - 20 of 96,940