Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 1 - 10
of
2,603
Table 2. Revised ODMRP Join Query Packet Header
2002
"... In PAGE 3: ... Table 1 illustrates the advertisement format. Table2 shows the combination of an ODMRP join query packet header with the service advertisement, where the Reserved field specifies whether a service advertisement is attached. The multicast group IP address for the service is the IP address of the multicast group that consists the server and its possible consumers.... In PAGE 3: ... However, the content is different: (i) the Type field is set to 0x02 as service query, (ii) the Option field is 0, and (iii) the Service Name is the service ID of the queried service. Since it is also piggybacked in an ODMRP join query packet, correspondingly, the Reserved field in Table2 specifies whether a service query is attached. Moreover the Multicast Group IP Address field is set to the well-known multicast address for service queries.... ..."
Cited by 16
Table 2. Revised ODMRP Join Query Packet Header
2002
"... In PAGE 3: ... Table 1 illustrates the advertisement format. Table2 shows the combination of an ODMRP join query packet header with the service advertisement, where the Reserved field specifies whether a service advertisement is attached. The multicast group IP address for the service is the IP address of the multicast group that consists the server and its possible consumers.... In PAGE 3: ... However, the content is different: (i) the Type field is set to 0x02 as service query, (ii) the Option field is 0, and (iii) the Service Name is the service ID of the queried service. Since it is also piggybacked in an ODMRP join query packet, correspondingly, the Reserved field in Table2 specifies whether a service query is attached. Moreover the Multicast Group IP Address field is set to the well-known multicast address for service queries.... ..."
Cited by 16
Table 2: National-level estimates of the 1990 census undercount from the 1991 revision of the
2000
"... In PAGE 7: ... In July 1991 #28when Secretary Mossbacher had to decide whether or not to adjust the o#0Ecial numbers#29, the adjustmentwould have added about 5.3 million people, more than demographic analysis indicated the census had missed #28see Table2 #29.... In PAGE 8: ...ost Enumeration Survey and Demographic Analysis #28DA#29. Table from #5B47#5D. Population estimates from Demographic Analysis and the 1990 PES do not agree in detail. The 1990 PES estimate is higher than the DA estimate: according to the PES, there are over a million more women, and about half a million fewer men #28see Table2 #29. The PES estimate of the number of women missed by the census is about twice the DA estimate.... In PAGE 9: ...6#25 #5Bthe #0Cgure is 1.58#25 in attachment3, Table2 #5D ::: The level of total bias, excluding correlation bias, on the revised estimate of undercount is negative0.73 #28-0.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 20. Attribute Attachments
1999
"... In PAGE 9: ...able 19. Force Design Tool Characteristics ..................................... 42 Table20 .... In PAGE 73: ....4.1 Representing Relevant Data General specifications for impact modeling can be and have been produced [Hartley, 1995]. A key concept is dual level of resolution, illustrated in Table20 . The most important objects in the model are specifically enumerated, e.... ..."
Table 2: Attribute Attachments
"... In PAGE 3: ...1 Representing Relevant Data General specifications for impact modeling have been produced [Hartley 1995]. A key concept is dual level of resolution, illustrated in Table2 . The most important objects in the model are specifically enumerated, e.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
2,603
