Results 11 - 20
of
84
Table 2 and Table 5) also appear to be limited to a single 30 hectare plantation in 289
"... In PAGE 2: ...rom .ca [Canada], and 321 from .us [mainly the US federal government]). This 57 indicates that Australia is a major player in mixed-species research and debate, and 58 offers an interesting case study. Table2 examines internet domains that display 59 material relating to mixed-species plantations, both globally and within Australia. 60 61 [Table 2 near here] 62 ... In PAGE 2: ... Table 2 examines internet domains that display 59 material relating to mixed-species plantations, both globally and within Australia. 60 61 [ Table2 near here] 62 ... In PAGE 3: ...its in this category is misleading, because the count is contaminated by e.g., repeated 67 counts of the same scientific paper displayed by different service providers (CSA, 68 Ingenta, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, etc). However, Table2 does reveal that Australia has 69 a relatively large proportion of the global mixed-species activity, and that government 70 agencies (those with .gov domains) are major players in promoting the mixed-species 71 message on the internet.... In PAGE 3: ...gov domains) are major players in promoting the mixed-species 71 message on the internet. 72 73 Despite the high score attained by government agencies in Table2 , it appears that in 74 Australia, they do not walk the talk . Table 3, a summary of the National Plantation 75 Inventory (Parsons and Gavran 2005), indicates that Australia has only 359 ha of 76 mixed-species plantations, of which 305 ha (85%) is privately owned, and planted 77 since 1995.... In PAGE 4: ... The Australian Tax Office currently has 93 such Rulings 100 relating to timber plantation (Table 5); of these, all but three relate to monocultures 101 (or in the case of sandalwood, a host plant plus the intended crop). The three 102 polyculture Rulings involve two species planted in alternate rows by BioEnergy 103 Australia ( Table2 ). Table 4 overstates the real position of mixed plantings, because it 104 does not take areas into consideration, and Rulings relating to monocultures tend to 105 refer to larger areas than those relating to mixed plantings.... In PAGE 9: ...263 most likely to vary with a mixed species planting are assumed to be operations 264 planning, planting costs, seedlings and cultivation. The simplest mixed-species 265 planting in which two species alternate by rows (as is proposed by BioEnergy 266 Australia, Table2 ), should involve no additional cost apart from some operations 267 planning. In the unlikely event that these costs doubled, a modest 0.... In PAGE 9: ... 281 282 Despite this optimistic prognosis, commercial uptake of mixed plantings continues to 283 be slow and erratic. For instance, EcoForest Limited (mentioned in Table2 ) was set 284 up in 1997 to establish mixed-species plantations in the Hunter Valley region of New 285 South Wales (NSW). They issued a prospectus in 2000 seeking to raise capital 286 through the issue of shares, but were placed in receivership in 2005 because of 287 insufficient investment.... In PAGE 20: ...Table2 . Sources of internet-based material on mixed-species plantings (based on 573 searches for mixed-species and plantation and timber on 10 March 2006).... ..."
Table: Half life of Miral 500CS on leaves and fruit, and in soil on two coffee plantations in Jamaica ______________________________________________________________________________
1999
Table 2 provides the results for one scenario, a periodically harvested pine plantation, with the
"... In PAGE 19: ... We then divide the carbon sequestration annuity by the total acreage of forestation , TFORCH , relative to the baseline in order to place it on a per acre basis. Lastly, we compute the marginal cost per ton of carbon sequestration MC for each scenario by dividing marginal cost per acre per year by the per acre carbon sequestration annuity: As discussed below, Table2 illustrates this computation for a periodically harvested pine... In PAGE 20: ...6 million tons annually. As can be seen in Table2 and Figure 2, the marginal costs of carbon sequestration increase approximately linearly... In PAGE 26: ... And the carbon consequences of a unit of retarded deforestation (51.83 tons per acre from Table2 ) are significantly greater than those associated with a unit of forestation (41.05 tons per acre from Table 2), in terms of present-value equivalents.... In PAGE 26: ...83 tons per acre from Table 2) are significantly greater than those associated with a unit of forestation (41.05 tons per acre from Table2 ), in terms of present-value equivalents. The increased quot;carbon efficiency quot; of the policy intervention in the context of a high level of background deforestation thus reduces the marginal costs of sequestration below what they otherwise would be in the context of high agricultural prices.... ..."
Table 2.4: Plantation areas, south-east Queensland (hectares).
2004
Table 1 Investment appraisal for longleaf pine plantations Value estimator Old-field longleaf Cutover longleaf
Table 13: Number of vertebrate species only recorded in the 38-40.5 year old E. cloeziana plantations compared to the species only recorded in the 0.3-1.8, 2.1-3.8 or 15-16.5 year old plantations.
2002
"... In PAGE 77: ...bove 1.8 m (Figures 39 and 40) than the P(0.3-18yrs) and P(2.1-3.8yrs) plantation age classes. These differences in habitat attributes may link to differences in vertebrate species present within the four plantation age classes. Using only vertebrate species records from the plantations, Table13 compares the number of species only recorded in the 38-40.5 year old E.... In PAGE 77: ...pecies only recorded in either the 0.3-1.8, 2.1-3.8 or 15-16.5 year old plantations. It is clear from Table13 that species composition varies. There were also 21 bird species recorded in the P(03-1.... ..."
TABLE 4: DISCOUNT RATE SENSITIVITY OF THE COST AND QUANTITY OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION Pine Plantation, Sale of Merchantable Timber When/If Deforestation Occurs
Table 2.15. Summary of estimated plantation expansion from 2000 to 2020 for 5 NPI regions from Ferguson et al (2002).
2004
Table 3. Average specific gravity reduction, thickness change, and weight loss of plantation-grown southern pine composition boards.
"... In PAGE 2: ... Table3 shows the average specific gravity reduction (SGR). thickness change (TC), and weight loss (WL) of specimens exposed to three wood decay fungi for 16 weeks.... ..."
Table 6. Paired sites used by Bashkin and Binkley (1998) Site Elevation(m) Start cane cultivation End cane cultivation Start Eucalyptus plantation
1999
"... In PAGE 75: ... They used 13C/12C isotopic ratios to estimate the effect on total carbon of loss of carbon from the antecedent cane agriculture and gain of carbon from the new tree plantations. Five paired sites, containing sugarcane plantation and Eucalyptus saligna plantations established on, and adjacent to, abandoned cane fields, were sampled ( Table6 ). Using this approach, they were able to show that the net effect of afforestation on total soil carbon after cultivation depends not only on the new carbon gained, but also on the carbon lost from previous management.... ..."
Results 11 - 20
of
84