Results 21 - 30
of
67,101
Table 2. Demographics of simultaneous catheterization- echocardiography subjects analyzed retrospectively
in diastolic
2006
"... In PAGE 4: ... However, no subject in either group had ongoing or active ischemia. Demographics are presented in Table2 . For each subject, 25 consec- utive E-waves and simultaneous LV pressures were analyzed.... ..."
Table 9. Simultaneous registration and cali- bration as a function of the noise levels in the initial estimates (L = 4; Ns = 100).
1999
Cited by 10
Table 6. Advanced single subject registration by age 2001-2005
2005
"... In PAGE 73: ....3.1.4 Table6 shows the number and percentage of 16-year-old students who registered for English Language, Maltese, Mathematics and Physics during the period 2001-2005. Table 6.... In PAGE 73: ....3.1.4 Table 6 shows the number and percentage of 16-year-old students who registered for English Language, Maltese, Mathematics and Physics during the period 2001-2005. Table6 . SEC registrations of the 16-year-old cohort for core subjects Year English Maltese Mathematics Physics Language 2001% 3712 3492 3435 3049 of 1985 cohort 68.... ..."
TABLE 1. Characteristics of 10 Schizophrenic and 10 Comparison Subjects in an fMRI Study of Auditory Processing
Cited by 1
Table 4. Registration Times for T2- Weighted to MP-RAGE Data from the Vanderbilt Project
"... In PAGE 8: ....05, including Bonferroni adjustment). A possible explanation for the fact that registration was signif- icantly better than with the complete set when using set C, but not when using sets A and B, is that there was one more patient in the comparison be- tween the set C results and the complete set, which gives the t-test more power. Computational Efficiency Registration times for complete and all sparse T2- weighted sets of MRI images from the Vanderbilt project are presented in Table4 . All optimizations of the registration transformation were performed using a minimum step size of 10 mm for transla- tional and 0.... In PAGE 8: ... As the increased registration time for set C suggests, pa- tient 106 was a more difficult task to complete than the other patients even for that set. In addition to the times given in Table4 for an SGI workstation, some registrations were re- peated on a different computer system (Pentium II-based PC, 450 MHz clock speed, 384 MB of RAM, running Windows NT 4.0).... ..."
Table 3 Average validation results of EM-based method with population-speciflc atlas and non-rigid registration-based label propagation on four 2-year-old subjects using Dice metrics.
Table 2. Median registration errors for PET to MRI registration. PET images were registered to proton-density (PD), T1-, and T2-weighted MRI. Furthermore, MRI was available without (non-rectified) and with (rectified) field inhomogeneity correction applied. For a detailed description of image data and accuracy assessment see [3].
1999
"... In PAGE 3: ... 3.2 Accuracy For PET to MRI registration, median errors using no thresholding, coincidence, and standard thresholding are given in Table2 .... ..."
Cited by 8
Table 1 Parameter values fit jointly to psychophysical and fMRI data for subject djh
Table 2 Parameter values fit jointly to psychophysical and fMRI data for subject gmb
Results 21 - 30
of
67,101