Results 1 - 10
of
18,402
Table 2. User-Centered Design Dimensions
Cited by 1
Table 1. User-centered design processes
Table 1. Users in a Sample of the User-Centered Design Literature.
2007
"... In PAGE 3: ... Hackos and Redish (1998) warn against confusing users with buyers, against interacting with surrogate users only, and recommend studying users as members of communities. Table1 summarizes these viewpoints. However, outside local design contexts and for research purposes, there is a need to define the user more carefully to achieve a shared understanding.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 10. Search expert commentary matched to features and SEO tactics: User-Centered Design.
2007
"... In PAGE 11: ...arket Research Category................................................................................................ 50 Table10 . Search expert commentary matched to features and SEO tactics: User-Centered Design.... ..."
Table 1: Differences between User-Centered Design and Usage-Centered Design (from [6])
in Druck:
"... In PAGE 9: ... (1997) propose five categories of web-based geoinformation systems, see Table 1. Table1 : GIS categories and their provided GIS functionality. Category of web-based GIS Provided functionalities Geodata server Data management Map server Data management, visualization Online retrieval system Data management, visualization, retrieval Online GIS Data management, visualization, retrieval, GIS analysis GIS function server Visualization, retrieval, GIS analysis Internet-Mapping and real Web-GIS (which must include GIS analysis functionality) help to integrate the geoinformation that is further distributed in a company.... In PAGE 62: ... Also, putting models in the center of process instead of design artifacts, bears open question related to user participation and validation, as end-users are usually not familiar with formal specifications and modeling techniques. Table1 captures the main differences between User-Centered Design and Usage- Centered Design. 3.... ..."
Table 1. A list of requirements and features, articulated by the students during a user-centered design workshop.
Table 1. Salient Differences between User-Centered and Usage-Centered Design
"... In PAGE 2: ... This difference in emphasis is reflected in differing practices that have a significant impact on the development life cycle and on integration with software engineering. Table1 summarizes salient differences in the two approaches. Unlike user-centered design, whose methods and traditions are firmly rooted in the human factors and human-computer interaction world, usage-centered design is grounded in a strong engineering orientation reflecting the background of its co-developers, including one of the early pioneer software methodologists (Constantine).... ..."
Table 2. Model for user-centered IR interaction and interface design (based on a model by Allen, 1996a, p.24)
1997
"... In PAGE 19: ...o perform this study, we used the Dienst server at SICS, described in section 3.1. The data were collected during August-November 1996. To accomplish our task of investigating the user activities and linking them to the user interface design, we will follow a model and a framework ( Table2 ) proposed by Allen (1996a, p. 24) which is slightly modified15: Table 2.... In PAGE 34: ....3.4 (L) Satisfaction with navigation support and (L) Satisfaction with search effectiveness We then performed a qualitative analysis on an individual level for both single variables and combined variables, concerning stated requirements made in connection to the variables respectively. They were categorized and coded into a matrix ( Table2 0) as follows: the first column contains a list of requirements concerning the information objects, the database search engine and indexing as well as the database structure. The list of requirements are coded into simple words or phrases to describe the function needed.... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 1: Progression of AWARE applications from preflight web-based, through real-time alerting in-cockpit, to real-time, multiple flight alerting. AWARE is also unique compared to previous work on information filtering using Bayesian networks [1, 2, 4] in that we have exploited the same underlying Bayesian network, weather database, and software infrastructure across three quite different AWARE software systems. The AWARE project was based on User-Centered Design concepts [5], engaging users for design, reviews of prototypes, and usability testing, following the Usability Engineering
in Information Filtering using Bayesian Networks: Effective User Interfaces for Aviation Weather Data
2003
"... In PAGE 1: ... In a typical instance, our filtering by time, preference, and hazard analysis reduced the number of reports from over 25,000 alerts to 5 alerts for the entire flight. The hazard analysis system, which is the focus of the present article, is an integral part of three related aviation systems, as summarized in Table1 . What differentiates AWARE from previous work on display of aviation weather data is its context-sensitivity and ability to restrict the amount of data ... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 6. Phases and outcomes of the user-centered concept development process
"... In PAGE 31: ... The new titles for the phases were 1) Project commitment, 2) User and technology research, 3) Innovation sprint, 4) Iterative concept creation and validation and 5) Project assessment. Table6 illustrates the main phases of the process with their respective subtasks and outcomes. The following chapters describe each phase with suggestions and descriptions of suitable methodology to accomplish the required tasks.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
18,402