"... In PAGE 3: ... In the following, the term communication variables refers to these metrics. Table2 provides synthetic notations for communication metrics. Each notation is composed of three parts separated by an underscore.... In PAGE 4: ... the communication activities) during one month. Project global co-ordination effort is the sum of the 12 metrics listed in Table2 . It also the sum of the variables I_T_COORD, I_N_COORD, E_T_COORD and E_N_COORD.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... We note Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 provide evaluation results related to the third model. Indeed: ?? Table 6 is concerned with internal co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table7 is concerned with external co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table 8 provides information related to technical co-ordination impact on project global co-ordination effort; ?? Table 9 provides information related to non-technical co-ordination impact on software project global co-ordination effort. In order to assess the stability and the meaning of the estimates, we estimate each model many times by removing each of its explanatory variables.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... The results of the above models estimation are shown in Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 while Table 3 provides the correlation matrix between the variables considered in the three models. We note Table6 , Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 provide evaluation results related to the third model. Indeed: ?? Table 6 is concerned with internal co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table 7 is concerned with external co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table 8 provides information related to technical co-ordination impact on project global co-ordination effort; ?? Table 9 provides information related to non-technical co-ordination impact on software project global co-ordination effort.... In PAGE 5: ... We note Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 provide evaluation results related to the third model. Indeed: ?? Table6 is concerned with internal co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table 7 is concerned with external co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table 8 provides information related to technical co-ordination impact on project global co-ordination effort; ?? Table 9 provides information related to non-technical co-ordination impact on software project global co-ordination effort. In order to assess the stability and the meaning of the estimates, we estimate each model many times by removing each of its explanatory variables.... ..."

"... In PAGE 21: ... Table8 : Number of documents with a research and co-ordination content, and whether the former are individual or collaborative documents. * five of these are co-authored by the (assistant) project leader(s).... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ...Fig. 2). Projections of the individual attention-related activity maps onto the flattened occipital surface showed significant increases in the BOLD signal with attention in area V1 in all subjects and in areas V2, V3/VP and V4v in the majority of subjects (Fig. 3 and Table1 ). Most subjects also showed significant activa- tions in the middle occipital gyrus and adjacent sulci anterior to area V3A, in the posterior fusiform gyrus anterior to area V4v, and in the posterior parietal cortex.... In PAGE 8: ... 2 and 3 show a high degree of correspondence between the areas activated by passive viewing and those modulated in the spatial attention task. In addi- tion, Table1 indicates that the Talairach coordinates of the activation clusters in the two conditions are very similar. Indeed, of the brain voxels that were signifi- cantly active during passive viewing, 42% were also activated during the attention conditions.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... About 100 developers belonging to 40 software projects were concerned by this study. The results of the above models estimation are shown in Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table9 while Table 3 provides the correlation matrix between the variables considered in the three models. We note Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 provide evaluation results related to the third model.... In PAGE 5: ... We note Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table 9 provide evaluation results related to the third model. Indeed: ?? Table 6 is concerned with internal co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table 7 is concerned with external co-ordination impact on software project global co- ordination effort; ?? Table 8 provides information related to technical co-ordination impact on project global co-ordination effort; ?? Table9 provides information related to non-technical co-ordination impact on software project global co-ordination effort. In order to assess the stability and the meaning of the estimates, we estimate each model many times by removing each of its explanatory variables.... In PAGE 5: ... By another way, since the estimated coefficients associated with the dummy variables are not significant in any model, all the models have been recalculated without considering these variables. Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Table9 rows correspond to the coefficients estimates of each explanatory variable except for the two last rows which show the R-Square ratios and P-Values of the estimated models. A low P-Value suggests that the dependent variable may be linearly related to independent (explanatory) variables.... ..."

"... In PAGE 27: ... Half of the time VC has been used for co-ordination matters among researchers and staff; and for the other half it has been used, in combination with application sharing and whiteboard, by the project leader to collaborate with researchers on research content. In sum, what sort of information is each medium used for? Table13 contains the percentages for this period. It shows that BSCW is the electronic medium most used for research purposes.... ..."

"... In PAGE 63: ... For example, if looking at both Mary and John, then both plus and forms the co-ordinate conjunction. The co-ordinate conjunctions can be seen in Table6 . If one phrase is subordinate to another, the conjunction will be a subordinate conjunction.... ..."