Results 11 - 20 of 360,719

Table 7b: Non-reproductive effects in fish

in of DG XXIV, Consumer Policy and Consumer Health Protection
by E Dybing, Oslo Member Cstee, O Ladevoged, Copenhagen Member Cstee, C Lambré, Verneuil-en-halatte Member Cstee, I Br, Ad Vethaak, Middelburg External Expert 1999
"... In PAGE 40: ... Table7 a: Reproductive effects in fish effect/ disorder location species associated contaminants reference elevated blood vitellogenin in male fish UK, estuaries semi-field study rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss (caged) sewage effluents: natural and synthetic oestrogenic hormones, nonylphenol Harries et al., 1996, 1997 elevated blood vitellogenin in male fish Denmark semi-field study rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss (caged sewage effluents: natural and synthetic oestrogenic hormones, i.... ..."

Table 25. Expected Effect of a 1-Fish Bag Limit with the Opportunity to Harvest a Second Fish, No Demand Effects

in DRAFT FOR INITIAL REVIEW Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for a Regulatory Amendment to Implement Guideline Harvest Level Measures in the Halibut Charter Fisheries in IPHC Regulatory Areas 2C
by unknown authors 2007
"... In PAGE 4: ...able 24. Second Fish as Portion of Area 2C Charter Angler Harvests, 2006........................................28 Table25 . Expected Effect of a 1-Fish Bag Limit with the Opportunity to Harvest a Second Fish, No Demand Effects.... ..."

Table 44. Expected Effect of a 1-Fish Bag Limit with the Opportunity to Harvest a Second Fish, No Demand Effects

in DRAFT FOR INITIAL REVIEW Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for a Regulatory Amendment to Implement Guideline Harvest Level Measures in the Halibut Charter Fisheries in IPHC Regulatory Areas 2C
by unknown authors 2007
"... In PAGE 5: ...educed participation .............................................................................................................42 Table44 . Expected Effect of a 1-Fish Bag Limit with the Opportunity to Harvest a Second Fish, No Demand Effects.... In PAGE 60: ... The option contains four sub-options establishing this minimum length for the second halibut at 45 inches, 50 inches, 55 inches, or 60 inches. As shown in Table44 , the higher this limit is set, the closer this option comes to replicating the equivalent of a one-fish bag limit. Without accounting for reduced participation or changes in discard mortality, ADF amp;G analysts predicted that a 45 inch limit would reduce harvest by 21.... ..."

Table 29 Expected Effect of a 1-Fish Bag Limit with the Opportunity to Harvest a Second Fish, No Demand Effects

in DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for a Regulatory Amendment to Implement Guideline Harvest Level Measures in the Halibut Charter Fisheries in IPHC Regulatory Areas 2C
by unknown authors 2007

Table 44 Expected Effect of a 1-Fish Bag Limit with the Opportunity to Harvest a Second Fish

in DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/ Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for a Regulatory Amendment to Implement Guideline Harvest Level Measures in the Halibut Charter Fisheries in IPHC Regulatory Areas 2C
by unknown authors 2007
"... In PAGE 72: ... At its April 2007 meeting, the Council rejected sub-options for second fish minimum lengths of 55 inches and 60 inches over concerns for the difficulty of measuring such large fish without bringing them aboard. As shown in Table44 , the higher this limit is set, the closer this option comes to replicating the equivalent of a one-fish bag limit. Without accounting for reduced participation or changes in discard mortality, ADF amp;G analysts predicted that a 45-inch limit would reduce harvest by 19.... ..."

Table 3: StarFish code size

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2003
"... In PAGE 6: ... Note that C9 BP BD is the current operating state for commercial systems that are not using synchronous remote copy mechanisms, so this configuration is useful as a reference. 5 Implementation Table3 shows the number of source lines and lan- guage for various components of StarFish. The com- mon code includes library functions and objects that are used by both the HE and SE.... ..."
Cited by 6

Table 8. Number of vessels fishing and average catch inside and outside of cooperatives and number of cooperative vessels exceeding proposed cap percentages (in the 2005-2006 season). Number of

in Discussion paper on cooperative vessel use caps Bering Sea /Aleutian Islands crab DISCUSSION PAPER ON COOPERATIVE VESSEL USE CAPS
by North Pacific, Fishery Management Council 2007
"... In PAGE 11: ... Since the provision would establish new caps applicable to vessels fishing in cooperatives, the action would only have effect to the extent that cooperative participants who would otherwise choose to fish in excess of the cap would be limited by the cap. Effects of proposed caps on fleet size and consolidation Table8 below shows the number of vessels fishing inside and outside of cooperatives, as well as the average amount fished by these vessel groups and the number of cooperative vessels that would have exceeded the proposed caps. The table shows that 4 vessels in the Bristol Bay red king crab and C.... ..."

Table 3: StarFish code size

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 6: ... Note that Q = 1 is the current operating state for commercial systems that are not using synchronous remote copy mechanisms, so this configuration is useful as a reference. 5 Implementation Table3 shows the number of source lines and lan- guage for various components of StarFish. The com- mon code includes library functions and objects that are used by both the HE and SE.... ..."

Table 4. Number of vessels fishing and average catch inside and outside of cooperatives and number of cooperative vessels exceeding proposed cap percentages (in the 2005-2006 season).

in DISCUSSION PAPER ON COOPERATIVE VESSEL USE CAPS
by North Pacific, Fishery Management Council 2006
"... In PAGE 9: ... Since the provision would establish new caps applicable to vessels fishing in cooperatives, the action would only have effect to the extent that cooperative participants who would otherwise choose to fish in excess of the cap would be limited by the cap. Effects of proposed caps on fleet size and consolidation Table4 below shows the number of vessels fishing inside and outside of cooperatives, as well as the average amount fished by these vessels and the number of cooperative vessels that would have exceeded the proposed caps. The table shows that 4 vessels in each fishery exceeded the three percent cap, while 9 vessels in the Bristol Bay red king crab fishery and 13 vessels in the Bering Sea C.... In PAGE 9: ...An alternative approach to examining cooperative behavior relative to the proposed caps is to examine the activities within each cooperative relative to the caps. Table4 shows the number of cooperatives with vessels exceeding the proposed caps during the 2005-2006 season and the number of cooperatives with their average vessel exceeding the proposed caps. The table shows that most of the cooperatives had vessels exceeding the proposed two percent cap, while few had vessels exceeding the three percent cap.... ..."

Table 7 Fishing gear and fishing practice modifications that have been shown to affect incidental catch of sea turtles in pelagic longline fisheries (FAO, 2004a).

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2005
"... In PAGE 34: ... This is a conservative assumption but may not necessarily be correct. Table7 lists a number of measures that have been shown to reduce turtle bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries, with hook and bait modifications reported to be the most important gear parameter affecting catch rates of turtles. Fisheries experiments have indicated that circle hooks and fish bait (i.... ..."
Results 11 - 20 of 360,719