Results 1 -
7 of
7
Table 1 ScienceDirect menu page names and descriptions
2007
"... In PAGE 7: ... Menus in themselves provide information in that they update the viewer with on-site jour- nal and issue information. The following ( Table1 ) provides ScienceDirect menu page names and descriptions. There are four menu pages to be navigated before the user accesses journal content.... ..."
Table 1 ScienceDirect menu page names and descriptions
2007
"... In PAGE 6: ... Menus in themselves provide information in that they update the viewer with on-site jour- nal and issue information. The following ( Table1 ) provides ScienceDirect menu page names and descriptions. There are four menu pages to be navigated before the user accesses journal content.... ..."
Table 3. Other UK-connected journal publishers on the Web
"... In PAGE 2: ... Evolution of a species: the growth of peer-reviewed e-journals 1994-97 Table 2. Online journals produced by HEFC pilot site licence publishers Table3 . Other UK-connected journal publishers on the Web Table 4.... ..."
Table 1. A list of free literature update alerting services
2004
"... In PAGE 1: ... A number of other selective dissemination of information (SDI) services exist, both commercial and free to the public. Some examples include PubMed Cubby, BioMail, JADE, OVID and ScienceDirect ( Table1 ). Together with PubCraw- ler, these have all been recently reviewed (3,4).... ..."
Table 2: Ratings on the Keyboard during 1st and 2nd half sessions
2004
"... In PAGE 8: ....85, p gt;0.18). This result seems opposite of what one might expect -- one might predict that after training with the top down learning strategies, users will show greater bias of their own performance but not necessarily improve their opinion of the keyboard. Some of the ratings had significant interactions between the learning conditions and the sessions (see Table2 ). The ... In PAGE 9: ...anuscript version. Official copy available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/ slightly in the learning group. This pattern emerged for their attitude towards the keyboard ( Table2 : Q1, F1, 28 = ... In PAGE 9: ...Table2... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 2 and Table 5) also appear to be limited to a single 30 hectare plantation in 289
"... In PAGE 2: ...rom .ca [Canada], and 321 from .us [mainly the US federal government]). This 57 indicates that Australia is a major player in mixed-species research and debate, and 58 offers an interesting case study. Table2 examines internet domains that display 59 material relating to mixed-species plantations, both globally and within Australia. 60 61 [Table 2 near here] 62 ... In PAGE 2: ... Table 2 examines internet domains that display 59 material relating to mixed-species plantations, both globally and within Australia. 60 61 [ Table2 near here] 62 ... In PAGE 3: ...its in this category is misleading, because the count is contaminated by e.g., repeated 67 counts of the same scientific paper displayed by different service providers (CSA, 68 Ingenta, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, etc). However, Table2 does reveal that Australia has 69 a relatively large proportion of the global mixed-species activity, and that government 70 agencies (those with .gov domains) are major players in promoting the mixed-species 71 message on the internet.... In PAGE 3: ...gov domains) are major players in promoting the mixed-species 71 message on the internet. 72 73 Despite the high score attained by government agencies in Table2 , it appears that in 74 Australia, they do not walk the talk . Table 3, a summary of the National Plantation 75 Inventory (Parsons and Gavran 2005), indicates that Australia has only 359 ha of 76 mixed-species plantations, of which 305 ha (85%) is privately owned, and planted 77 since 1995.... In PAGE 4: ... The Australian Tax Office currently has 93 such Rulings 100 relating to timber plantation (Table 5); of these, all but three relate to monocultures 101 (or in the case of sandalwood, a host plant plus the intended crop). The three 102 polyculture Rulings involve two species planted in alternate rows by BioEnergy 103 Australia ( Table2 ). Table 4 overstates the real position of mixed plantings, because it 104 does not take areas into consideration, and Rulings relating to monocultures tend to 105 refer to larger areas than those relating to mixed plantings.... In PAGE 9: ...263 most likely to vary with a mixed species planting are assumed to be operations 264 planning, planting costs, seedlings and cultivation. The simplest mixed-species 265 planting in which two species alternate by rows (as is proposed by BioEnergy 266 Australia, Table2 ), should involve no additional cost apart from some operations 267 planning. In the unlikely event that these costs doubled, a modest 0.... In PAGE 9: ... 281 282 Despite this optimistic prognosis, commercial uptake of mixed plantings continues to 283 be slow and erratic. For instance, EcoForest Limited (mentioned in Table2 ) was set 284 up in 1997 to establish mixed-species plantations in the Hunter Valley region of New 285 South Wales (NSW). They issued a prospectus in 2000 seeking to raise capital 286 through the issue of shares, but were placed in receivership in 2005 because of 287 insufficient investment.... In PAGE 20: ...Table2 . Sources of internet-based material on mixed-species plantings (based on 573 searches for mixed-species and plantation and timber on 10 March 2006).... ..."
Table 2. Sources of internet-based material on mixed-species plantings (based on 573
"... In PAGE 2: ...rom .ca [Canada], and 321 from .us [mainly the US federal government]). This 57 indicates that Australia is a major player in mixed-species research and debate, and 58 offers an interesting case study. Table2 examines internet domains that display 59 material relating to mixed-species plantations, both globally and within Australia. 60 61 [Table 2 near here] 62 ... In PAGE 2: ... Table 2 examines internet domains that display 59 material relating to mixed-species plantations, both globally and within Australia. 60 61 [ Table2 near here] 62 ... In PAGE 3: ...its in this category is misleading, because the count is contaminated by e.g., repeated 67 counts of the same scientific paper displayed by different service providers (CSA, 68 Ingenta, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, etc). However, Table2 does reveal that Australia has 69 a relatively large proportion of the global mixed-species activity, and that government 70 agencies (those with .gov domains) are major players in promoting the mixed-species 71 message on the internet.... In PAGE 3: ...gov domains) are major players in promoting the mixed-species 71 message on the internet. 72 73 Despite the high score attained by government agencies in Table2 , it appears that in 74 Australia, they do not walk the talk . Table 3, a summary of the National Plantation 75 Inventory (Parsons and Gavran 2005), indicates that Australia has only 359 ha of 76 mixed-species plantations, of which 305 ha (85%) is privately owned, and planted 77 since 1995.... In PAGE 4: ... The Australian Tax Office currently has 93 such Rulings 100 relating to timber plantation (Table 5); of these, all but three relate to monocultures 101 (or in the case of sandalwood, a host plant plus the intended crop). The three 102 polyculture Rulings involve two species planted in alternate rows by BioEnergy 103 Australia ( Table2 ). Table 4 overstates the real position of mixed plantings, because it 104 does not take areas into consideration, and Rulings relating to monocultures tend to 105 refer to larger areas than those relating to mixed plantings.... In PAGE 9: ...263 most likely to vary with a mixed species planting are assumed to be operations 264 planning, planting costs, seedlings and cultivation. The simplest mixed-species 265 planting in which two species alternate by rows (as is proposed by BioEnergy 266 Australia, Table2 ), should involve no additional cost apart from some operations 267 planning. In the unlikely event that these costs doubled, a modest 0.... In PAGE 9: ... 281 282 Despite this optimistic prognosis, commercial uptake of mixed plantings continues to 283 be slow and erratic. For instance, EcoForest Limited (mentioned in Table2 ) was set 284 up in 1997 to establish mixed-species plantations in the Hunter Valley region of New 285 South Wales (NSW). They issued a prospectus in 2000 seeking to raise capital 286 through the issue of shares, but were placed in receivership in 2005 because of 287 insufficient investment.... In PAGE 9: ... They issued a prospectus in 2000 seeking to raise capital 286 through the issue of shares, but were placed in receivership in 2005 because of 287 insufficient investment. The plantation activities of BioEnergy Australia (also in 288 Table2 and Table 5) also appear to be limited to a single 30 hectare plantation in 289 NSW. 290 291 In Australia, there are no differential grants to favour plantations of any particular 292 species or combination.... ..."