"... In PAGE 3: ... coli asdeterminedfromrandomscreening method.Exactsequences canbefoundin Table1 . (C)Multiple sequence alignment of the N-terminal half of TERT proteins containing the GQ, CP, QFP, and T motifs generated by ClustalW (Chenna et al.... In PAGE 4: ... Plasmid DNA was isolated and sequenced from 27 colonies overexpressing fusion proteins larger than 35 kDa in size. Figure 1B and Table1 summarize the results of this screen. As expected, several of the sequences obtained in the screen were found to have mutations near the N or C terminus of the construct, due to the random nature of the PCR primers used (Table 1) (Kawasaki and Inagaki 2001).... In PAGE 4: ... Figure 1B and Table 1 summarize the results of this screen. As expected, several of the sequences obtained in the screen were found to have mutations near the N or C terminus of the construct, due to the random nature of the PCR primers used ( Table1 ) (Kawasaki and Inagaki 2001). Numerous constructs were found spanning the fingers and part of the palm subdomains of the reverse transcriptase motifs (motifs 1, 2, A, and B) and the region of TERT containing the N-terminal GQ, CP, and QFP motifs.... In PAGE 5: ...) for produc- tion of soluble protein. While performing the expression tests, we noticed that all of the sequences obtained that spanned the GQ motif ( Table1 , colonies 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) were overexpressed to an exceptionally high level. We therefore focused on this region of TERT in order to validate that the high- throughput assay was indeed identifying regions of the protein that could be expressed in a soluble form and purified with a high yield.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... 5: Comparisons for the Triple DES Application Based on the measurements described in Section IV, the speed-ups of the SRC-6E machine vs. Intel Pentium 4 PC are given in Table3 . Two cases are considered for the Pentium 4 implementation of Triple DES, non-optimized implementation described in Section 4.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ... This goal is especially important for large server and inter- active applications. Table1 illustrates the state of this trade-off with the throughput (running time), and responsiveness (maximum pause) of a highly responsive reference counting (RC) collector and a high throughput generational collector (BG-MS) on two Java benchmarks. Generational (G) collectors separate new objects from old ones since they tend to have different demographics.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ... This goal is especially important for large server and inter- active applications. Table1 illustrates the state of this trade-off with the throughput (running time), and responsiveness (maximum pause) of a highly responsive reference counting (RC) collector and a high throughput generational collector (BG-MS) on two Java benchmarks. Generational (G) collectors separate new objects from old ones since they tend to have different demographics.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ... This goal is especially important for large server and inter- active applications. Table1 illustrates the state of this trade-off with the throughput (running time), and responsiveness (maximum pause) of a highly responsive reference counting (RC) collector and a high throughput generational collector (BG-MS) on two Java benchmarks. Generational (G) collectors separate new objects from old ones since they tend to have different demographics.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ... This goal is especially important for large server and inter- active applications. Table1 illustrates the state of this trade-off with the throughput (running time), and responsiveness (maximum pause) of a highly responsive reference counting (RC) collector and a high throughput generational collector (BG-MS) on two Java benchmarks. Generational (G) collectors separate new objects from old ones since they tend to have different demographics.... ..."