"... In PAGE 8: ... 1.2 An Initial Look at Voting in 1987 As an initial examination of the 1987 British election we present in Table1 the percentage of voters supporting each party based upon respondents apos; demographic traits, economic perceptions, and issue positions. The data we use are taken from the 1987 British Election Study (Heath 1989).... In PAGE 8: ... The data we use are taken from the 1987 British Election Study (Heath 1989). In accord with common class-based theories of British elections, there is a strong class-oriented e ect seen in Table1 . While 53.... In PAGE 8: ...abour, while Labour support dropped to 20.6% among white-collar workers. However, there was no large distinction between Alliance voting rates for the two groups: Alliance received 22% of votes from blue-collar workers and 26% of votes cast by white-collar workers. [ Table1 Here] We also present the voting behavior of respondents based upon whether they thought in- ation, unemployment and taxes had decreased, stayed the same, or increased in the past year. Economic factors appeared to enter strongly into the determination of voter choices between the Conservative and Labour party, but less strongly into the decision as to whether to vote Alliance.... In PAGE 9: ...8 The data in Table1 for voter issue positions and vote choice indicate that these issue per- ceptions may also have played a large role in this election. We present the percentage of voters choosing each party based on their self-reported views on defense, on the relative importance of government e orts to ght in ation or unemployment, on redistribution of income, and crime.... In PAGE 15: ... However, apparently neither Alliance nor Labour convinced voters that they were the superior alternative on this dimension as the two challenging parties divided equally the spoils. Notice that this is di erent than the inference one could draw from Table1 . The bivariate results... In PAGE 15: ... Notice that this is di erent than the inference one could draw from Table 1. The bivariate results in Table1... ..."

"... In PAGE 18: ... The results for issue e ects are not surprising when we consider the fact that the Alliance party staked out moderate positions | between the Conservatives and Labour | on each of the issues we examine. Table4 displays the mean positions of the parties and respondents on each of the seven issue scales. These issue scales are 11-point scales, and the positions of the parties (the average positions taken from voter placements of the parties in the survey data) show a large amount of separation between the Conservative and Labour parties in this election.... In PAGE 19: ...18 one point on these scales separating each party.15 [ Table4 Here] This supports the implications of theoretical discussions in the literature about American national elections. Early debates by Shepsle (1972) and Page (1978) both showed, in the context of di erent models of campaign dynamics, that candidates and campaigns often have the strategic incentive to obfuscate their positions to the electorate, echoing work by Key (1966).... In PAGE 30: ... 15. The issue placements in Table4 illustrate the error involved in many analyses of British elections | assuming the Alliance party to be positioned exactly between the Conservatives and the Labour party (c.... ..."

"... In PAGE 67: ... The joint actions involve initiating or participating in public campaigns, lobbying the government, supporting other civil groups in demonstrations, days of action, issuing joint communiques, education and training programmes, etc. However, among trade union respondents to the survey, a greater number indicated that it is easier to forge alliances on the basis of social or political issues other than gender ( Table28 ). Apparently, equality issues are not considered as such burning issues as to be able to galvanize trade unions and other civil groups to come together for concerted, high-profile joint actions.... ..."

"... In PAGE 17: ... The di erence between these probabilities is the e ect of the change in the independent variable of interest. The estimated rst di erences for the three retrospective evaluations of the national economy and for four of the issue distance variables are given in Table3 . At the top of the table we give the baseline probabilities for our hypothetical voter.... In PAGE 18: ... The estimates for issue e ects presented next however, do show how voters chose between the two out-parties. [ Table3 Here] We present similar results for four issues | redistribution, welfare, crime, and defense | in Table 3. Here we move the voter apos;s position from one end of each issue dimension to the other, keeping the party positions constant.... In PAGE 18: ... The estimates for issue e ects presented next however, do show how voters chose between the two out-parties. [Table 3 Here] We present similar results for four issues | redistribution, welfare, crime, and defense | in Table3 . Here we move the voter apos;s position from one end of each issue dimension to the other, keeping the party positions constant.... In PAGE 18: ... These issue scales are 11-point scales, and the positions of the parties (the average positions taken from voter placements of the parties in the survey data) show a large amount of separation between the Conservative and Labour parties in this election. On welfare and defense (the two issues with the largest e ect in Table3 ), the di erences between the Conservative and Labour parties are substantial, over 3 points on these scales. For crime, the issue with the... In PAGE 18: ... On welfare and defense (the two issues with the largest e ect in Table 3), the di erences between the Conservative and Labour parties are substantial, over 3 points on these scales. For crime, the issue with the least e ect in Table3... ..."

"... In PAGE 15: ...001. Table4 presents results of multiple regressions with random effects for the dependent variable measured by CARs over four different event windows. For each of these different windows, the first model reports a base set of control variables.... ..."

"... In PAGE 74: ...Table13 { continued from previous page Instance Carriers Chg. in System Chg.... ..."

"... In PAGE 15: ... Eight out of the Top Fifteen law firms in Germany ranked by turnover originated from the combination of a German firm with a large British or American firm during this four-year period. Taking into account also Baker amp; McKenzie as an American firm and CMS as a European network, there remain only five of the top fifteen firms that are German (see Table3 ). (TABLE 4 ABOUT HERE) ... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...82, p = .028 (see Table3 ). Thinking in terms of security might be a more surface reaction to the event described in the program.... ..."