• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 101
Next 10 →

Table 1: Alliance codes in the alliance dataset. 0 or NA No alliance

in Modeling Interstate Alliances with Constrained Random Dot Product Graphs
by David J. Marchette, Carey E. Priebe
"... In PAGE 3: ...du/~marchette/igo.tgz. In this latter dataset, there are a total of 214 nations, since while some of these do not have alliances, they do have other attributes such as trade. For each pair of nations, alliance is coded as in Table1 . There are some missing values in the interstate alliance data, and in this study we treat these as missing edges.... In PAGE 3: ... Various methods for imputing the missing values could be considered instead. While the edges are colored by alliance type (see Table1 ), we will consider only the simpli ed graph with binary edges: existence or absence of an alliance. We will construct an alliance graph for each year.... ..."

Table 1: Alliance codes in the alliance dataset. 0 or NA No alliance

in Scan Statistics for Interstate Alliance Graphs
by unknown authors 2006
"... In PAGE 4: ...Gibler and Sarkees [2004]). The data are available at cow2.la.psu.edu. For each nations pair, alliance is coded as in Table1 . There are some missing values in the interstate alliance data, and in this study we treat these as missing edges.... In PAGE 4: ... Various methods for imputing the missing values could be considered instead. While the edges are colored by alliance type (see Table1 ), we will consider only the simpli ed graph with binary edges: existence or absence of an alliance. Note that there are missing values (for reasons unknown to us), and we have chosen to encode these as \no alliance quot;.... ..."

Table 7: Pack Mating Alliances and Generations through Time, 1996-2000 Year Alliance 1 Alliance 2 Alliance 3 Alliance 4 Not Allied

in and approved by
by Thomas J. Fararo, Richard Grannis, Norman P. Hummon 2002
"... In PAGE 8: ...able 6: Four Mating Alliances ................................................................................................... 69 Table7 : Pack Mating Alliances and Generations through Time, 1996-2000.... In PAGE 74: ... 74 Figure 16: Mating Allliances among Packs of Yellowstone Wolves, 1995-2000 Color denotes alliance membership: Red=Alliance 1; Gray=Alliance 2; Green=Alliance 3; Gray=Alliance 4. Table7 provides a look at the formation of mating alliances among packs through time. Letters in parentheses (see Table 7) represent the clusters/generations of males.... In PAGE 74: ... Table 7 provides a look at the formation of mating alliances among packs through time. Letters in parentheses (see Table7 ) represent the clusters/generations of males. Table 7 uses the same notation of underlining and italics for harem arrangements as Table 5.... In PAGE 74: ... Interestingly, Alliances 1 and 2 include polygynous groupings within their core, originally translocated, packs (Rose amp; Druid in Alliance 1 and Nez in Alliance 2). Table7 shows that in 1996 Rose Creek, Leopold, and Crystal Creek Packs belong to Alliance 1. Also in 1996, an intrapack relinking within the Nez Perce Pack forms Alliance 2.... In PAGE 76: ... 76 Table7 (Continued): Pack Mating Alliances and Generations through Time, 1996-2000 2000 Rose (B) Leopold (B) Hellroar. (C) Absaroka (B) Druid 2 (B) Sunlight (C) Crystal 3 (C) Nez 2 (B) Jackson/G.... ..."

Table 6 (Continued): Four Mating Alliances

in and approved by
by Thomas J. Fararo, Richard Grannis, Norman P. Hummon 2002
"... In PAGE 8: ...able 5: Generational Clusters by Pack and Territory Acquisition Style.................................... 66 Table6 : Four Mating Alliances .... In PAGE 69: ... Put another way, all the cycles in the P-Graph that are connected by at least two nodes form a structurally endogamous block and are considered members of the same mating alliance. Table6 shows the pairs and packs that comprise each of the four structurally endogamous blocks, or mating alliances. Table 6: Four Mating Alliances Alliance 1 Alliance 2 Alliance 3 Alliance 4 Pair Nos.... In PAGE 69: ... Table 6 shows the pairs and packs that comprise each of the four structurally endogamous blocks, or mating alliances. Table6 : Four Mating Alliances Alliance 1 Alliance 2 Alliance 3 Alliance 4 Pair Nos. Pack Pair Nos.... ..."

Table 2: Status of Supply Chain Alliance Initiatives

in By:
by Stanley E. Fawcett, Gregory M. Magnan, Matthew W. Mccarter, Stanley E. Fawcett, Gregory M. Magnan
"... In PAGE 9: ... This reality raises an important question, How far have companies really progressed in their journey toward synergistic alliance management? To begin to answer this question, the three groups of materials managers were asked to indicate the extent to which they agreed with 12 different statements that assessed the implementation status of key supply chain alliance initiatives (see Table 2). *** Insert Table2 about here *** The fundamental principle driving supply chain integration is that closer, more ... In PAGE 11: ... This perception makes building relationships based on equal sharing a strenuous effort. To summarize the findings from Table2 , gradual progress is being made in forming supply chain alliances. Advances are most pronounced in the areas of specific programs designed to better meet customer demands.... ..."

Table 15: Network Information for Approximated WOW Alliance

in Designing allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances. Working paper
by M. Houghtalen, Dr. Özlem Ergun Advisor, Dr. Joel Sokol Advisor, Dr. Alan Erera, Dr. Ellis Johnson, Dr. Beril Toktay 2006
"... In PAGE 86: ... More detailed information regarding the approximated networks can be found in Appendix A. The following abbreviations are used in Table15 , Appendix A, and the remainder of this section: \JAL quot; for Japan Airlines, \LH quot; for Lufthansa, \SAS quot; for Scandinavian Airlines, and \SIA quot; for Singapore Airlines. The legs are generated according to the network operated by each carrier, with the origin and destination times being set in a similar manner as in the experiment investigating complementarity of markets (Section 3.... In PAGE 112: ... The capacity value and load value rules in general behave as expected, with LH commanding the largest portion of alliance beneflt due to its larger size. (As can be seen in Table15 in Section 3.4.... ..."
Cited by 1

Table VI. Top five manufacturer alliance achievements

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 4 Conditional Logit Estimates British Election - 1987 Conservative/Alliance Labour/Alliance Defensea

in When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multi-Party Elections
by R. Michael Alvarez, J. Nagler 1998
"... In PAGE 11: ...6 Conditional Logit - An Example To demonstrate what conditional logit estimates look like we again turn to the data from the 1987 British general election, and here we contrast conditional logit estimates to the multinomial logit and pair-wise binomial logit results presented earlier. We present the conditional logit estimates in Table4 . We do not have a great deal to say about these estimates here, except to note two points.... In PAGE 12: ... The rst column of individual speci c coe cients is for Conservative relative to Alliance, the second column of individual speci c coe cients is for Labour relative to Alliance. [ Table4 Here] With both the multinomial logit estimates from Table 2 and the conditional logit estimates we could compute tables of rst di erences { i.e.... In PAGE 18: ... So what? As we stated earlier, this suggests that inferences made of a hypothetical two-party race will be particularly suspect. To see the extent of the possible error, we computed predicted vote-shares for Labour and Conservative in a two-party race with Alliance omitted using both the conditional logit estimates reported in Table4 , and the multinomial probit estimates reported in Table 6. Table 7 gives the estimated vote shares in two and three party races using both models.... ..."
Cited by 17

Table 2: Factors affecting the formation of specific block alliances

in Science Publishing
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 23: ... This gave substantial market power to the cable companies. Prop 3: breakaway alliances will share the same environmental drivers (time con- straints, high within-SDO technological competition) with supplemental alli- ances, but differ in that alliance mem- bers will exhibit significant market power Table2 lists the environmental char- acteristics argued to drive the emergence of block alliances in their three forms in the formal standards process, summariz- ing the propositions. DISCUSSION Block alliances are a common fea- ture of formal standard setting in the ICT industry, but their presence raises some interesting issues.... ..."

Table 11: System Revenue and Accepted Loads for Two-Carrier Alliances

in Designing allocation mechanisms for carrier alliances. Working paper
by M. Houghtalen, Dr. Özlem Ergun Advisor, Dr. Joel Sokol Advisor, Dr. Alan Erera, Dr. Ellis Johnson, Dr. Beril Toktay 2006
"... In PAGE 67: ...2.1 Results and Insights from Two-Carrier Alliances Rounded results pertaining to the alliance optimal solution are contained in Table11 . The \Carriers quot; column indicates the class from which each carrier is selected; in instance class 1, for example, both carriers in the alliance are carriers from class C1.... ..."
Cited by 1
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 101
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University