"... In PAGE 3: ... As mentioned above, in the literature, there are two separate streams of knowledge in understanding the mechanism of the market change, which are adoption of innovation or infrastructure innovation. Table1 condenses these two perspectives along with their theoretical supports. Next, we review theories and practices of both traits, and discuss the necessity and possibility of linking the two schools together so as to open the black-box of innovation in mobile telecommunications market.... In PAGE 4: ...3 The interrelated processes of innovation and adoption We challenge the present work that generally treats mobile telecommunications market change from either an infrastructure innovation or a service adoption perspective. Based on specific sets of theories, both perspectives offer plausible explanations to why a complex socio-technological system diffuses ( Table1 ). Yet, we argue that these two fundamental perspectives are complementary, not exclusive; they are interdependent, not separate.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... Six attributes apply to autonomous innovations and six to systemic innovations. These twelve attributes are represented in Table1 : Innovation... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... This convention is particularly useful for exploring innovations in the project-based residential building industry. Table1 illustrates the Henderson and Clark innovation framework and gives examples of building industry innovations for each category. Table 1.... ..."

"... In PAGE 53: ...posed integrity and stability. Table3 offers a summary of key attributes of innovations and their definitions. In the discus- sion that follows, we concentrate on the five attributes discussed in Rogers [1983] (first five rows in the table); however, the table also includes the set of ten attributes covered in Tornatz- ky amp; Klein [1982].... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ... Such models incorporate the traditional relationship between North and South; but they are less appropriate for the analysis of relationships between the mature industrial economies (OECD) and the rapidly growing economies of the Paci c Rim. Table1 indicates how South Korea and Taiwan, two leading Paci c Rim economies, are now emerging as centres of R amp;D activity and new product de- velopment. By comparing the ratio of R amp;D expenditure in GDP, the annual compound growth in R amp;D expenditure, and patents granted to residents of Tai- wan and South Korea with two other typical advanced OECD countries, USA and UK, we can see that the former group is becoming a focus of innovation in its own right.... ..."