This software may be modified, copied and redistributed, both within the recipient’s organization and externally, subject to the following restrictions: (a) The recipient may not derive income for the Georgia Tech Research Corporation (herein ”GTRC”) software itself; (b) In any derivative works based on this software, the recipient agrees to acknowledge GTRC; (c) Any copies made of this software must be accompanied by the following copyright notice: ”Copyright 1994- 1997, 1999- 2003 Georgia Tech Research Corporation. All rights Reserved. ” as well as the complete copyright notice file COPYRIGHT; and (d) The recipient agrees to obey all U.S. Government restrictions governing redistribution or export of such information. These restrictions may apply to redistribution within an international organization. GTRC makes no warranties or representations, either expressed or implied, with respect to the software contained herein, its quality, merchantability, performance or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall GTRC or its developers, directors, officers, employees or affiliates be liable for direct, incidental, indirect, special or consequential damages (including damages or loss of business profits, business interruption, loss of business

the contributors we would like to acknowledge the assistance of IJC (Dr. M. Clamen). Help

The purpose of the study was to examine how the exclusion of teams failing to meet varying statistical criteria for consensus on cohesiveness influences the magnitude of the cohesion– team success relationship. The index of agreement was calculated for 78 teams (N = 1,000 athletes) that had completed the Group Environment Questionnaire. Results showed that excluding teams because they fail to satisfy various criteria for consensus leads to changes in the magnitude of the cohesion–team success relationship. The magnitude of the relationship between team success and the individual attractions to group-task manifestation of cohesion showed progressive decreases as criteria required to demonstrate consensus became more stringent. Conversely, the magnitude of the relationship between team success and the group integration–task and group integration–social manifestations of cohesion showed progres-sive increases as criteria required to demonstrate consensus became more stringent. The

Shared memory in design: a unifying theme for

Editorial Commite in alphabetic order

Editorial Committee (in alphabetical order)

In order to survive, a great number of small companies are forced to offer a wide product variety and often to respond to the market with customised solutions. At the same time, fast delivery is often a key to win orders. As a result, a vital challenge for these companies is to overcome the trade

Moscow – Frankfurt a.M. – Johannesburg, 2009

Evidence-based policy for environmental sustainability: a path forward for South Africa

This report describes an experimental day care program in Amsterdam, begun in 1969 to investigate how a day care center could contribute towards the favorable development of children under four from unskilled and semiskilled families: Because it is only recently that day care for children under four has been used to any extent, this is the first project in the Netherlands that is collecting psychometric data on young children which will form the basis for further research. Included in the report is information concerning: (1) the Dutch educational system; (2) objectives, organization, and evaluation (instruments and testing schedules) of the project; (3) the child care workers, with comments ou current and future selection and training techniques; (4) the children's daily schedule and the special attention given to problem children; (5) parents ' involvement in the program, with special comment on the development of a room in which parents can meet informally with each other and the social worker; and (6) six major limitations on evaluating the project statistically. (ED)