"... In PAGE 10: ...nch Mach 10 Air Tunnel with the shorter strut, while Fig. 15 shows the longer strut. Note that the longer strut places the nose of the model at nearly the centerline of the tunnel. Test Conditions Nominal reservoir stagnation and corresponding freestream flow conditions for the present tests are presented in Table3 . Flow conditions for the 31-Inch Mach 10 Air Tunnel were based on measured reservoir pressures and temperatures and recent unpublished calibrations of the facility.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... The earlier test compared the original 4 trip configurations, while the later tests investigated the proposed modification to Trip 2b and the effect of the trips on the closed cowl. The run logs, which lists the parametrics that were investigated during 194 aeroheating runs, is presented in Table 4 for Test 338, Table5 for Test 349, and Table 6 for Test 351, and the resulting global heating images are shown in chronological order by run number in Appendices A, B, and C, respectively. All the images were acquired with the camera approximately perpendicular to the model windward surface.... In PAGE 20: ... Table5 : Trip screening test matrix cross-reference of open-cowl runs conducted in the LaRC 31-Inch Mach 10 Tunnel. Trip 1 Trip 2a Trip 2b Trip 2c Trip 3 Baseline a kRe023402340234023402340234 0.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ...1 Aerothermodynamic Facilities Complex The experiments reviewed in this paper were conducted in four facilities of the Aerothermo- dynamic Facilities Complex at NASA Langley Research Center: the 20-Inch Mach 6 Air Tun- nel, the 31-Inch Mach 10 Air Tunnel, the 20- Inch Mach 6 CF4 Tunnel, and the 22-Inch Mach 20 Helium Tunnel. Table1 gives a summary of the nominal reservoir and corresponding free- stream flow conditions in each facility along with the Reynolds number range available. A detailed description of these facilities along with their performance characteristics, history, and... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... The earlier test compared the original 4 trip configurations, while the later tests investigated the proposed modification to Trip 2b and the effect of the trips on the closed cowl. The run logs, which lists the parametrics that were investigated during 194 aeroheating runs, is presented in Table4 for Test 338, Table 5 for Test 349, and Table 6 for Test 351, and the resulting global heating images are shown in chronological order by run number in Appendices A, B, and C, respectively. All the images were acquired with the camera approximately perpendicular to the model windward surface.... ..."

"... In PAGE 10: ... The earlier test compared the original 4 trip configurations, while the later tests investigated the proposed modification to Trip 2b and the effect of the trips on the closed cowl. The run logs, which lists the parametrics that were investigated during 194 aeroheating runs, is presented in Table 4 for Test 338, Table5 for Test 349, and Table 6 for Test 351, and the resulting global heating images are shown in chronological order by run number in Appendices A, B, and C, respectively. All the images were acquired with the camera approximately perpendicular to the model windward surface.... In PAGE 19: ... Table5 : Run log for Test 349 conducted in LaRC 31-Inch Mach 10 Air Tunnel. Run Number Model a (deg) b (deg) Re (x106/ft) Trip Type k (in) Cowl Results 1 1-S 2 0 2.... ..."