Results 1 - 10 of 82

Table 2 Natural and Current flows in the Steels, Pauls and Dixons Creek system Steels Creek (including Dixons Creek) Pauls Creek

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 13: ... Table2 shows the change to high, median and low natural flows with the impact of current user demands. Table 2 Natural and Current flows in the Steels, Pauls and Dixons Creek system Steels Creek (including Dixons Creek) Pauls Creek... ..."

Table 7 - Paul apos;s Transform All Days at Once

in Towards an Empirical Model of WWW Site Response Times
by Thomas A. Wagner
"... In PAGE 16: ... Not only is response-time very highly correlated with time of day, but the different days of the week exhibit very much the same response time characteristics. To further support this observation, Figure 28 and Table7 show the results of applying Paul apos;s Transform to the response times for all days, lumping the days together, and regressing with respect to time of day. The R^2 value of 72% is high in keeping with the observation that the days exhibit similar response time cycles.... ..."

TABLE III Comparison of the results obtained by PARLBG, PARELBG, PAUL and LBGS with Lena

in LBGS: A Smart Approach for Very Large Data Sets Vector Quantization
by Mirko Mantineo, Marco Russo

TABLE III Comparison of the results obtained by PARLBG, PARELBG, PAUL and LBGS with Lena

in LBGS: A Smart Approach for Very Large Data Sets Vector Quantization
by Mirko Mantineo, Marco Russo, et al.

Table 7: The LULOG dialogue concerning Lea and Paul. Let us nally assume that we learn that Paul who is also a student is Lea apos;s cohabitant. So we add the facts sdtn(paul), chbt(paul), and chbt(lea) with truth value 6 to the knowledge base. When we now ask for single people we obtain that the predicate sng holds with truth value 3 for Lea as well as for Paul. Together with the knowledge that Lea and Paul are cohabitants, this leads to a value of 3 for cntr (contradiction). The protocol of the corresponding LULOG dialogue is shown in table 7.

in A Lukasiewicz Logic Based Prolog
by Frank Klawonn, Rudolf Kruse 1994
Cited by 3

Table 6: The LULOG dialogue concerning Lea. Additional entries for the knowledge base (ASSERT! (SDNT PAUL 6)) (ASSERT! (CHBT PAUL 6)) (ASSERT! (CHBT LEA 6)) Question Answer

in A Lukasiewicz Logic Based Prolog
by Frank Klawonn, Rudolf Kruse 1994
"... In PAGE 20: ... This is due to the low truth value for chbt and mrd, so that we still can accept this partial contradiction. Table6 shows a LULOG protocol of the corresponding questions and answers.... ..."
Cited by 3

Table 1. The effort of implementing a conver- sation with and without PAUL as lines of code (LOC)

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 6: ... We measured the effort to implement a conversation both with PAUL and without it. Table1 shows that an agent developer using PAUL has to write fewer lines of code and fewer classes in order to implement a conversation compared to program- ming directly using Opal message filters. The difference in- creases as the complexity of the conversation increases.... ..."

T able 1. The e ort of implementing a conversation with and without PAUL as lines of code (LOC )

in
by D"+ E
"... In PAGE 59: ... We measured the e ort to implement a conversation with PAUL and without it. Table1 shows that an agent developer using PAUL has to program fewer lines of code and fewer classes in order to implement a conver- sation compared to programming directly using Opal. The di erence increases if the complexity of the conversation increases.... ..."

Table 2. Minneapolis and St. Paul Bicycle Commute Share, 1990-20001

in 4. Title and Subtitle Optimization of Transportation Investment: Guidelines for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Bicycle Facilities: Refining methods for estimating the effect of bicycle infrastructure on use and property values
by Kristen Thompson, Author/s Gavin Poindexter, Kevin J. Krizek, Gary Barnes, Kristen Thompson 2007
"... In PAGE 8: ...able 1. Twin Cities Metro Area Bicycle Commute Share, 1990-2000............................. 9 Table2 .... In PAGE 19: ...530 0.664 1 1 Table2 shows the Central Cities portion of Table 1 broken down by Minneapolis and St. Paul, due to ... ..."

Table 1-1. Navigation System Features for Systems Reviewed in Paul (1996).

in 4. Title and Subtitle Driver Distraction with Route Guidance Systems
by National Highway, Traffic Safety Administration, L. Tijerina, S. Johnston, E. Parmer, M. D. Winterbottom 2000
"... In PAGE 8: ...List of Tables Table1 -1.... In PAGE 35: ... Paul (1996) reported a product evaluation of the following navigation systems: Acura (developed in conjunction with Alpine Electronics) Oldsmobile Guidestar (developed by Siemens/Zexel, also the Hertz Neverlost) Clarion/Eclipse Interactive Voice Navigation System (built by Amerigon) Delco Telepath 100 Sony NVX-F160. Characteristics of these systems are represented in Table1 -1. Test drivers in the Los Angeles areas were asked to find three destinations of various types (unknown area, nearest fast-food restaurant, specific tourist attraction).... ..."
Results 1 - 10 of 82