"... In PAGE 3: ...n this work HSVd.p3 and used HSVd.apr[number] to name variants from apricot. The new sequence variants described here have been deposited in the EMBL database and are included in Table1 . This information was also added to the World Wide Web viroid catalogue (http:}}www.... In PAGE 3: ...rmeniaca L.) and Japanese plum (Prunus salicina L.). For each isolate, two to four independent full-length cDNA clones were sequenced ( Table1 ). In general, clones from different PCR reactions were analysed (noted as A or B in the clone name) in order to eliminate artefacts linked to the amplification process.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...2-3 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments Core IPv6 Functionality 1981 Path Maximum Transmission Unit Discovery for IPv6 Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 2460 Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) Specification Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 2461 Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 2462 IPv6 Stateless Address Auto configuration Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4007 IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture Stated in Addendum to LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4193 Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses Stated in Addendum to LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4291 IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4301 Security Architecture for Internet Protocol Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4443 Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes Routing and Switching 1772 Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet Stated in LoC Yes Yes R Met Yes 2545 Border Gateway Protocol Extensions for IPv6 Interdomain Routing Stated in LoC Yes Yes R Met Yes 2740 Open Shortest Path First for IPv6 Stated in LoC Yes Yes R Met Yes 2858 Border Gateway Protocol Extensions Stated in LoC Yes Yes R Met Yes 4271 A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required ... In PAGE 10: ...2-4 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status (continued) Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments Connection Technologies 2464 Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Ethernet Networks Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes O Met Yes 2467 Transmission of IPv6 Packets over FDDI Networks No Not tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2472 IP Version 6 over PPP Stated in LoC Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested Yes See Notes 1 amp; 2 2473 Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 Specification Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 2491 IPv6 over Non-Broadcast Multiple Access (NBMA) networks Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Not Tested O Not Tested Yes See Notes 1 amp; 2 2492 IPv6 over ATM Networks Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Not Tested O Not Tested Yes 2497 Transmission of IPv6 Packets over ARCnet Networks No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2507 Internet Protocol Header Compression No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2508 Compressing IP/UDP/RTP Headers for Low-Speed Serial Links No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2590 Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Frame Relay Networks Specification Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes O Met Yes 3095 RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Framework No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No 3146 Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 1394 Networks No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3241 Robust Header Compression (ROHC) over PPP No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3572 Internet Protocol Version 6 over MAPOS (Multiple Access Protocol Over SONET/SDH) No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes ... In PAGE 11: ...2-5 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status (continued) Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments 3843 RObust Header Compression (ROHC): A Compression Profile for IP No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4338 Transmission of IPv6, IPv4, and Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) Packets over Fibre Channel No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4362 RObust Header Compression (ROHC): A Link-Layer Assisted Profile for IP/UDP/RTP No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 Transition Mechanisms 2784 Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) Stated in LoC Yes Yes R Met Yes 4213 Transition Mechanisms for IPv6 Host and Routers Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes Common Network Applications 3041 Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6 No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3315 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3484 Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3596 DNS Extensions to Support IP Version 6 No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3953 Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for Presence Services No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3986 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 959 File Transfer Protocol No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 ... In PAGE 12: ...2-6 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status (continued) Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments 2428 FTP Extensions for IPv6 and Network Address Translators (NATs) No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2821 Simple Mail transfer Protocol No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2911 Internet Printing Protocol/1.... In PAGE 13: ...2-7 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status (continued) Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments 4109 Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange Version 1 (IKEv1) Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4302 IP Authentication Header Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4303 IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes 4304 Extended Sequence Number (ESN) Addendum to IPsec Domain of Interpretation (DOI) for Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol (ISAKMP) No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4305 Cryptographic Algorithm Implementation Requirements for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) and Authentication Header (AH) Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes O Met Yes 4306 Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4307 Cryptographic Algorithms for Use in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4308 Cryptographic Suites for IPsec Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes O Met Yes 4309 Using Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) CCM Mode with IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Stated in Addendum to LoC No Performance Test Required Yes O Met Yes ... In PAGE 14: ...2-8 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status (continued) Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments Mobility 3775 Mobility Support in IPv6 No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3776 Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling Between Mobile Nodes and Home Agents No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3963 Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4282 The Network Access Identifier No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4283 Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 Quality of Service 2205 Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Functional Specification No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2207 RSVP Extensions for IPSec Data Flows No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2210 The Use of RSVP with IETF Integrated Services No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 2474 Definition of the DiffServ Field in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers Stated in LoC Functional Test Performed Yes R Met Yes Refer to QoS Assessment Results 2750 RSVP Extensions for Policy Control No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3175 Aggregation of RSVP for IPv6 Reservations No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 Multicasting 3810 Multicast Listener Discovery Version 2 (MLDv2) for IPv6 Stated in LoC No Performance Test Required Yes R Met Yes ... In PAGE 15: ...2-9 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status (continued) Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments Network Operations and Management 2465 Management Information Base for IP Version 6: Textual Conventions and General Group Stated in Addendum to LoC Yes Yes O Met Yes 2466 Management Information Base for IP Version 6: ICMPv6 Group No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3226 DNS Security and IPv6 Aware Server/Resolver Message Size Requirements No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3315 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3411 An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks Stated in Addendum to LoC Yes Yes R Met Yes 3412 Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Stated in Addendum to LoC Yes Yes R Met Yes 3413 Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications Stated in Addendum to LoC Yes Yes O Met Yes 3595 Textual Conventions for IPv6 Flow Label No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 3596 DNS Extensions to Support IP Version 6 No Not Tested Not Tested N/R Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4022 Management Information Base for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Stated in Addendum to LoC Yes Yes O Met Yes ... In PAGE 16: ...2-10 Table2 -1. IPv6 Capability Requirements and Status (continued) Juniper M and T Series Routers Testing Completed Normal Router RFC RFC Title Conformance Performance Interoperability Requirement Met/Not Met Implemented Comments 4087 IP Tunnel MIB No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 4113 IP Version 6 Management Information Base for the UDP No Not Tested Not Tested O Not Tested No See Notes 1 amp; 2 LEGEND: ATM Asynchronous Transfer Mode ISAKMP Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol CBC Cipher Block Chaining LoC Letter of Conformance CCM Counter with CBC-MAC MAC Message Authentication Code DiffServ Differentiated Services MIB Management Information Base DoD Department of Defense N/R Not Required DNS Domain Name System O Optional ESP Encapsulating Security Payload OSI Open Systems Interconnection FDDI Fiberoptic Digital Data Interface PPP Point-to-Point Protocol FTP File Transfer Protocol R Required HAIPE High Assurance IP Encryptor RFC Request for Comments ICMPv6 Internet Control Message Protocol for IPv6 ROHC RObust Header Compression IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.... In PAGE 20: ... DEVICE CONFIGURATIONS. Table2 -2 provides hardware and software components used in the test network. ... In PAGE 21: ...2-15 Table2 -2. Test Configuration Hardware and Software Equipment Name Model Number IOS/OS/Version(s) Hardware Cisco Router CISCO3845 12.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ... The objective of this paper is to report on a highly flexible and regular architecture that can operate at a sufficiently high symbol rate and can be reconfigured in different modes to realize any one of the functional blocks required in the transmitters and receivers of most high speed communication systems. The developed architecture can be operated in any one of the modes listed in Table1 , all of which utilize the same I/O pins and have been mapped onto a common, highly regular datapath with minimal control and configuration circuitry. The immediate advantages of this approach include, greatly reduced development time and the ability to quickly and efficiently prototype and test a variety of different physical layer interfaces using the same hardware.... In PAGE 2: ... The main reason for these differences is due to the optimization of each architecture for the implementation of a single function. One of the major contributions of this work is to define a single computational element that forms the least common denominator for all the functions listed in Table1 . This computational unit, hereafter referred to as a tap, is shown in Figure 3.... In PAGE 4: ... The proposed architecture incorporates the modifications presented in [7] in order to improve the frequency resolution and power consumption of the DDFS compared to a straightforward implementation of the CORDIC algorithm. CONCLUSION In this paper we have presented a novel high speed VLSI architecture that can be reconfigured to realize many of the most computation intensive signal processing tasks required in a typical high speed communication system (refer to Table1 ). The proposed architecture is based on an array of identical taps each of which contains the least common denominator for the realization of all the functions listed in Table 1.... In PAGE 4: ... CONCLUSION In this paper we have presented a novel high speed VLSI architecture that can be reconfigured to realize many of the most computation intensive signal processing tasks required in a typical high speed communication system (refer to Table 1). The proposed architecture is based on an array of identical taps each of which contains the least common denominator for the realization of all the functions listed in Table1 . Consequently, the architecture is highly regular and scaleable.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ... Finally the computation of the slave portion xs corresponding to an eigenvector u of the slave problem can be done in parallel as well (Kssj ? p( u)Mssj)(xs)j = ?(Ksmj ? p( u)Msmj) u; j = 1; ; r : 4 Substructuring and parallel processes To each substructure we attach one process named `Sj apos; and with the master infor- mation we associate one further process called `Ma apos;. These processes work in parallel as shown in Table1 . For the necessary communication each `Sj apos; is connected to `Ma apos; directly or indirectly.... In PAGE 7: ... A detailed description is contained in [14]. Table1 shows how this parallel eigensolver which consists of the processes `Ma apos; and `R1 apos;,.... In PAGE 11: ... 6 Numerical results The parallel concept was tested on a distributed memory PARSYTEC transputer system equipped with T800 INMOS transputers (25MHz, 4 MB RAM) under the distributed operating system `helios apos;. Since each processor has a multiprocessing capability we were able to execute more than one process from Table1 on every processor which turned out to be extremly important for a good load balancing of the system. We do not discuss the mapping of the process topology to the processor network.... In PAGE 13: ... Table 4). For the parallel solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem via condensation and improvement using the Rayleigh functional according to Table1 we proposed in [16] the following proceeding.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ... Finally the computation of the slave portion xs corresponding to an eigenvector u of the slave problem can be done in parallel as well (Kssj ? p( u)Mssj)(xs)j = ?(Ksmj ? p( u)Msmj) u; j = 1; ; r : 4 Substructuring and parallel processes To each substructure we attach one process named `Sj apos; and with the master infor- mation we associate one further process called `Ma apos;. These processes work in parallel as shown in Table1 . For the necessary communication each `Sj apos; is connected to `Ma apos; directly or indirectly.... In PAGE 7: ... A detailed description is contained in [14]. Table1 shows how this parallel eigensolver which consists of the processes `Ma apos; and `R1 apos;,.... In PAGE 11: ... 6 Numerical results The parallel concept was tested on a distributed memory PARSYTEC transputer system equipped with T800 INMOS transputers (25MHz, 4 MB RAM) under the distributed operating system `helios apos;. Since each processor has a multiprocessing capability we were able to execute more than one process from Table1 on every processor which turned out to be extremly important for a good load balancing of the system. We do not discuss the mapping of the process topology to the processor network.... In PAGE 13: ... Table 4). For the parallel solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem via condensation and improvement using the Rayleigh functional according to Table1 we proposed in [16] the following proceeding.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... A grand challenge of universal interfaces is to represent, reason, and exploit these models to more effectively process input, generate output, and manage the dialogue and interaction between human and machine so that we maximize the efficiency, effectiveness, and naturalness, if not joy, of interacting. These key interface functions form the basis of Table1 that articulates some grand challenges for each of these User(s) Information Applications People Presentation Dialog Control Application Interface API input... In PAGE 3: ...Table1... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... RESULTS We have designed 6 Megacell modules in Esterel: SARAM and DARAM (internal memory controllers), a DMA controller, RHEA (a peripheral bus controller), MMIP and MMID (interfaces between the CPU and the external memory). Table1 shows some representa- tive experimental results. The CPU/DARAM communication being simple, we could develop a tool to automatically generate new test cases to increase the cover- age on DARAM.... ..."