Results 11 - 20
of
280,626
Table 5: Constraints of the UML 2 Profile for EPCs UML 2
2006
Cited by 2
Table 3. Mapping Rule between the Proposed UML Profile and MuleESB
2006
"... In PAGE 7: ... A mapping rule between the proposed profile and MuleESB is implemented as a set of Velocity4 transforma- tion templates, which define how to transform UML model elements to application code elements. Table3 summaries the mapping rule. Following this mapping rule, Ark trans- forms a stock quote example model (Figure 7) to application code shown in Figure 12.... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 3. Mapping Rule between the Proposed UML Profile and MuleESB
2006
"... In PAGE 7: ... A mapping rule between the proposed profile and MuleESB is implemented as a set of Velocity4 transforma- tion templates, which define how to transform UML model elements to application code elements. Table3 summaries the mapping rule. Following this mapping rule, Ark trans- forms a stock quote example model (Figure 7) to application code shown in Figure 12.... ..."
Cited by 4
Table 4: UML Profile for the PIM metamodel
"... In PAGE 10: ...able 3: XACML Policy Example..........................................................................................26 Table4 : UML Profile for the PIM metamodel .... In PAGE 52: ...2, we use the UML profile to represent the RBAC XACML PIM metamodel. The mapping between each element of the PIM metamodel and the stereotypes, constraints and tagged values, are shown in Table4... ..."
Table 1: UML4SOA concepts of package Structure
2007
"... In PAGE 10: ... Figure 9 depicts a UML structure diagrams showing these elements of the UML4SOA profile and the corresponding UML elements, for which they define an extension. Table1 provide a description of each stereotype. Figure 9: UML profile for service-oriented systems: structural elements ... ..."
Table 1. The mapping between SLN features, UML profile features, and UML Profile features.
"... In PAGE 7: ... The UML profile for SLN employs stereotype and tagged value to annotate SLN semantics in the SLN modeling syntax [7, 14]. Table1 indicates the mapping between SLN features, UML features, and UML Profile features. Table 1.... ..."
Table 1: Mapping of EPC Functions and Events to UML 2 Elements
2006
"... In PAGE 5: ... The profile is realised as a 1-1 mapping between EPCs and UML 2 activity diagrams, as both diagram types have similar concepts. In Table1 to 4 every element of the EPC gets a proper element or base class of the UML 2 activity diagram assigned. For ex- pressing constraints on the UML 2 profile for EPCs we use the Object Constraint Language (OCL) [5], described in Table 5.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 2. Profiles used to assess Web site quality.
2002
"... In PAGE 8: ... Original and modified versions of a Web page. Students based their improvements on the overall page quality and closest good-page cluster models described in Table2 . (Some of the... ..."
Cited by 9
Table 2: UML4SOA concepts of package Behaviour
2007
"... In PAGE 11: ... Figure 10 depicts the UML structure diagrams showing these elements of the UML4SOA profile and the corresponding UML elements, for which they define an extension. Table2 provide a description of each stereotype. Figure 10: UML profile for service-oriented systems: behavioural elements Stereotype name UML base class Description Used in Constrains Orchestration Activity Activity that specifies the orchestration of services to be executed.... In PAGE 13: ...imensions of these characteristics. Monitoring of the contracts is also supported. Figure 13 depicts the UML structure diagrams showing the elements the UML4SOA profile includes for modelling non-functional properties of services and the corresponding UML metaclasses, for which they define an extension. Table2 provide a description of each stereotype. ... ..."
Table 9: UML Class Element and POS Tagging UML Name UML
2006
"... In PAGE 79: ... Appendix B provides additional table entries. In Table9 , each UML Class element is listed by name, type of UML Class element, its part-of-speech tagging, the SUMO/WordNet association for each POS, the UML element within which it is defined (if the UML element is a UML Class then it is given with additional information detailing its classification as G=generalization, A=aggregation, C=composition), and any parameters associated with the UML Class element. It is significant to note the classification of the UML Classes ElevatorCar and DoorController as OSSD Entities.... ..."
Results 11 - 20
of
280,626