"... In PAGE 18: ... 5.4 Observed ux sampling errors The frequency of occurrence of soft agged ux sampling errors is summa- rized in Table1 . For the RASEX 10 m sonic vector stress magnitude and heat ux, the ux sampling ags for RSE, RF E, RN and Event are indi- vidually agged in 5-22% of the records, depending on the error type and the ux.... In PAGE 19: ...for the vector stress magnitude, which includes the cross-wind component. For BOREAS, individual ux sampling errors for the stress are agged more frequently than for heat and moisture ux ( Table1 ). Flux sampling errors are agged more frequently over Candle Lake compared to over land.... In PAGE 23: ...Table1 . Percent of records soft agged with ux sampling errors.... In PAGE 28: ... Accordingly, records are hard agged at these thresholds. Four records in Microfronts95 and three in RASEX are hard agged and veri ed as resolution problems ( Table1 , Appendix). As an example, in the hard agged RASEX virtual temperature record shown in Figure 1b, the physical uctuations are small and approach the resolution of the instrument... In PAGE 31: ... For this data, the absolute limits are 30 m/s for the horizontal wind components, 5 m/s for the vertical wind, -20 to +60 C for air temperature and 2 to 30 g/kg for speci c humidity. Several records in Microfronts95 are hard agged by the absolute limits test (Appendix, Table1 ). The majority of these (18 out of 22) are obvious instrument problems.... In PAGE 45: ... For the Microfronts95 tower 10 m data, (u; v; w; T; q), 53 of 254 records are hard agged and 28 are veri ed instrument problems. Table1 presents the number of records hard agged and subsequently veri ed as instrument problems for each quality control criteria. Note that a single record with an instrument problem can appear in Table 1 multiple times when the record is hard agged by several of the criteria.... In PAGE 45: ... Table 1 presents the number of records hard agged and subsequently veri ed as instrument problems for each quality control criteria. Note that a single record with an instrument problem can appear in Table1 multiple times when the record is hard agged by several of the criteria. For both RASEX and BOREAS data sets, the Haar variance and kur- tosis criteria are agged most frequently.... ..."

"... In PAGE 26: ...1.1 QA/QC Sampling Types In LTRMP water quality monitoring, six types of QA/QC samples are defined for field use ( Table4 ). These sample types are intended to evaluate the effects of natural variability and sample collection and processing on field measurement precision (repeatability) and accuracy.... In PAGE 28: ... Because they are inherently imprecise or difficult to control or replicate, the following measurements are excluded from QA/QC: current velocity, current direction, maximum water depth, phytoplankton, Secchi disk transparency, substrate, vegetation, wave height, and all measurements of snow and ice cover. All QA/QC samples are collected and processed in a manner compatible with the descriptions in Table4 . Except for travel, a QA/QC site requires the sample collection and processing time of approximately five routine sites.... In PAGE 28: ... Except for travel, a QA/QC site requires the sample collection and processing time of approximately five routine sites. Samples for QA/QC ( Table4 ) are collected and handled exactly as routine samples (Section 7) with the following modifications and special considerations: a. Split sample.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... Any block which failed QC was sent back to the field for rectification. Table2 shows the breakdown of the ... In PAGE 29: ... Table2 0: Estimated Undercount (Percent) for the Five Age Groups Within Each Sex Category Age Male o-14 8.4 15-29 11.... In PAGE 29: ...easurement studies (Fay et. al., 1988). Table 21 presents undercount estimates for the three poststrata and the two delivery panels used in the Rural PES. Table2 1: Estimated Undercount (Percent) for the Three Poststrata and Two Delivery Panels Poststratum Estimated Undercount (Percent) Black Owners 10.8 Black Renters 9.... In PAGE 30: ... Results of testing the PES card are shown in table 22. Table2 2: Outcome of Testing quot;PES Card quot; Approach (Newton County) Percent wno Reported Receiving Number Percent of Total Card Reported Receiving Card 120 38.5 100.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... Independent external quality-control visits and measurements by personnel from NIST, DOE, or elsewhere have also been a part of many studies for the last 20 years and add credibility to those studies. Table5 -1, at the end of this section, identifies laboratories sponsored by governmental or major private funding sources that have received independent quality-control visits from representatives of NIST or the DOE. Remaining Questions The capability exists to characterize, completely and precisely, the exposure of humans, laboratory animals or in-vitro preparations to electric and magnetic fields.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ... Figure 5 shows the PSDL model for the FFCS. In the interest of brevity, we shall only discuss the water quality control portion of the prototype in this paper, which is made up of six atomic operators: monitor_h2o, monitor_o2, monitor_nh3, control_water_flow, adjust_inlet and adjust_drain, with the associated control and timing constraints shown in Table1 . 1268... ..."