• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 3,209
Next 10 →

Table 2. 4dH; Theorem 10. Credulous and skeptical CHIM operators satisfy (IC0)-(IC3), (IC7) and (IC8). Thus, some important properties of IC merging operators are usually lost through the merge-then-revise process. We claim that this is not so dramatic since the main pur- pose of conciliation processes is not exactly the one of belief merging. Furthermore, speci c iterated merging operators (i.e., those induced by some speci c merging oper- ators 4) may easily satisfy additional postulates: Theorem 11. The credulous iterated merging operator associated to 4dD;Max

in Conciliation and consensus in iterated belief merging
by Olivier Gauwin, Sébastien Konieczny, Pierre Marquis 2005
"... In PAGE 9: ... Let us consider the credulous CHIMC operator de ned from the merging operator 4dH; . The computations are summarized in Table2 . The resulting pro le is [K2 1] = f(0; 0; 1)g, [K2 2] = f(1; 0; 0)g, [K2 3] = f(0; 0; 1)g and [K2 4] = f(1; 0; 0)g.... ..."
Cited by 4

Table 9. The difference between maximum and minimum belief and error impact confusion.

in Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
by Yunhyong Kim, Seamus Ross, Digital Curation Centre (dcc
"... In PAGE 8: ... In interpreting the information in Table 8, it seems reasonable to take the confusion level differences into consideration. We have merged the contents of Table 8 with these differences and presented the result in Table9 for a convenient overview. ... In PAGE 9: ...style and image, but the figures in Table9 seem to suggest that the weight is more prominently on image. Table 9.... ..."

Table 2 Number of Beliefs for Which Beliefs Scores Changed, by Group Changed on at

in Blending Mathematics Learning With an Early Field Experience: What Do
by Rebecca C. Ambrose, Cheryl Vincent, Rebecca C. Ambrose
"... In PAGE 11: ... Another way that we compared the beliefs-survey change scores was to examine the number of beliefs that that showed score change for each individual. Table2 shows that the majority of the control group and the MORE-R group (58.82% and 52.... ..."

Table 1. Data and beliefs: an overview

in Revising Beliefs Through Arguments: Bridging the Gap between Argumentation and Belief Revision in MAS
by Fabio Paglieri, Cristiano Castelfranchi 2004
"... In PAGE 5: ...The basic distinction between data and beliefs yields a rich picture of epistemic dynamics (Fig. 1 and Table1 ). From a computational viewpoint, such distinction opens the way for blended approaches to implementation [20]: data structures present remarkable similarities with Bayesian networks and neural networks, while belief sets are a well-known hallmark of AGM-style belief revision [13].... ..."
Cited by 4

Table 1: Description of the belief functions

in OBJECT DETECTION BY A MULTIPRIMITIVE PREATTENTIVE APPROACH OF THE PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION
by Pascal Vasseur, El Mustapha Mouaddib, Claude Pegard
"... In PAGE 12: ... The ignorance is not maintained and all cases are treated. Table1 below presents all belief functions used in the calculation of extremities. For a frame of discernment we give the calculation for every focal element and for the ignorance if it is managed.... ..."

Table 3: Belief function values

in Representing and Retrieving Structured Documents using the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence: Modelling and Evaluation
by Mounia Lalmas, Ian Ruthven 1998
Cited by 10

Table 3 : Belief function values

in Representing and Retrieving Structured Documents using the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence: Modelling and Evaluation
by Mounia Lalmas, Ian Ruthven 1998
Cited by 10

Table 7 : Belief values for the objects

in Representing and Retrieving Structured Documents using the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence: Modelling and Evaluation
by Mounia Lalmas, Ian Ruthven 1998
Cited by 10

Table 3: Belief function values

in Representing and Retrieving Structured Documents using the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence: Modelling and Evaluation
by Mounia Lalmas, Ian Ruthven 1998
Cited by 10

Table 1. Belief structure and use

in Hermes: Implementing goal-oriented agent interactions
by Christopher Cheong, Michael Winikoff 2005
"... In PAGE 9: ...g. customer or merchant in this particular scenario, refer to Table1 ). In our e-commerce example, the Customer is the initiator for the NegotiatePrice IG, thus it takes the initiative and proposes a price to the Merchant.... ..."
Cited by 6
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 3,209
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University