"... In PAGE 3: ... Part of the analysis focused on the 45 calcifications which were reported by more than half of the radiologists (about 50% of the 91 calcifications reported in the study). These are shown in Table2 . The groupings indicate whether the calcifications were diagnosed by most of the radiologists who reported them as benign, malignant or indeterminate; the group discrepant diagnoses includes the calcifications for which there was no diagnosis on which the majority of the participants agreed.... In PAGE 3: ... The groupings indicate whether the calcifications were diagnosed by most of the radiologists who reported them as benign, malignant or indeterminate; the group discrepant diagnoses includes the calcifications for which there was no diagnosis on which the majority of the participants agreed. Further, the benign calcifications could be classified in 10 distinct groups, as a function of the descriptors most commonly associated with them and, similarly, the malignant ones were classified into two distinct groups (see Table2 ). The first five groups of calcifications in the benign group were diagnosed as benign by all the radiologists who reported them.... In PAGE 3: ... For the rest of the benign calcifications and for the malignant and indeterminate ones there was no unanimity but agreement was always over 75%. The descriptors presented in Table2 are those which were used for all the calcifications in each group by two or more of the radiologists. Most of the calcifications in the table (especially those unanimously diagnosed as benign) were described with at least one property value which belonged to the set of discriminating descriptors shown in Table 1.... In PAGE 4: ...g. smudgy and punctate Table2 ). These combinations are represented as arguments supporting (though not confirming ) either candidate.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ...able 2 Articles Retrieved From ABI/Inform and LISA Using Selected Terminology... 28 Table3 Authors with four or more CI articles.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...e., three technology and four power perspectives) (see Table5 for a listing of the articles coded into each paradigm). These accounts focused on characterizing the research in each perspec- tive with regard to power and ITIDMU.... In PAGE 12: ... 26 No. 4/December 2002 Table5 . Articles Grouped by Technology and Power Perspectivea Technological Organizational Emergent Rational 1 Anand and Mendelson 1997 2 Carter 1984 3 Dennis et al.... In PAGE 18: ... Thus, in this section we more fully explore power at the juncture points by using the technology and power lenses simultaneously to synthesize our findings and develop metaconjectures. As noted in Table5 , the majority of articles (42 of them) adopt an organizational perspective. Of the 21 articles with the technological perspective, 17 fall in the technological-rational cell.... In PAGE 28: ... Alternatively, research could address societal impacts of IT on power distributions among networks of nations in which power is distributed asymmetrically. Power from Multiple Perspectives We identified 13 articles in Table5 as bridging articles, or articles that view power from multiple perspectives. The authors of the bridging articles explore empirical findings (Beath 1991; Dean et al.... ..."