Logics and Type Systems

Logics and Type Systems (1993)

Cached

Download Links

[www.win.tue.nl:8080]

by Jan Herman Geuvers , Herman Geuvers , Cover Jean , Bernard Koeman , Cip-gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek , Den Haag , Geuvers Jan Herman

Citations:

73 - 5 self

Versions

Version History

Metadata Version 3

User correction supplied by SystemCorrections

Datum	Value	Source
TITLE	Logics and Type Systems	INFERENCE
AUTHOR NAME	Jan Herman Geuvers	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR NAME	Herman Geuvers	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR AFFIL	Logics and type systems / Jan Herman Geuvers.- [S.l.:	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR NAME	Cover Jean	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR AFFIL	Logics and type systems / Jan Herman Geuvers.- [S.l.:	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR NAME	Bernard Koeman	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR AFFIL	Logics and type systems / Jan Herman Geuvers.- [S.l.:	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR NAME	Cip-gegevens Koninklijke Bibliotheek	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR AFFIL	Logics and type systems / Jan Herman Geuvers.- [S.l.:	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR NAME	Den Haag	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR AFFIL	Logics and type systems / Jan Herman Geuvers.- [S.l.:	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR NAME	Geuvers Jan Herman	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR AFFIL	Logics and type systems / Jan Herman Geuvers.- [S.l.:	SVM HeaderParse 0.2
ABSTRACT	from the last declaration in \Delta (which is p:'). (oe-E) In fact the ([\Theta]) is not exactly the ([\Theta]) that is found by induction. Possibly some of the free variables in ([\Theta]) are renamed. What happens is the following: 1. Consider the proof-context \Delta 1 ] \Delta 2 and especially the renaming of the declared variables in \Delta 2 that has been caused by the operation ]. 2. Rename the free proof-variables in ([\Theta]) accordingly, obtaining say, ([\Theta 0 ]). 3. Apply ([\Sigma]) to ([\Theta 0 ]). (There will in practice be no confusion if we just write ([\Theta]) instead.) Of course the intended meaning is that the judgement below the double lines is derivable if the judgement above the lines is. This will be proved later in Theorem 3.2.8. It should be clear at this point however that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the occurrences of ' as a (non-discharged) premise in the deduction and declarations p:' in \Delta. Notation. If for \Sigma a deducti...	user correction - Legacy Corrections
YEAR	1993	INFERENCE
VENUE TYPE	TECHREPORT	INFERENCE
TECH	PhD thesis	INFERENCE
CITATIONS	10 found	ParsCit 1.0