• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Learning Stochastic Logic Programs (2000)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF
  •  
  • Download as a PS

Download Links

  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [ftp.cs.york.ac.uk]
  • [ftp.cs.york.ac.uk]
  • [ftp.cs.york.ac.uk]
  • [ftp.cs.york.ac.uk]
  • [ftp.cs.york.ac.uk]
  • [www.doc.ic.ac.uk]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Stephen Muggleton
Citations:962 - 56 self
  • Summary
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

Versions

  • Version 0
  • Version 1
  • Version 2
  • Version 3
  • Version 4

Version History

Metadata Version 4

User correction supplied by mph

DatumValueSource
TITLE Learning Stochastic Logic Programs user correction
AUTHOR NAME Stephen Muggleton user correction
AUTHOR AFFIL DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE user correction
AUTHOR ADDR York, YO1 5DD, United Kingdom user correction
ABSTRACT Stochastic Logic Programs (SLPs) have been shown to be a generalisation of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), stochastic context-free grammars, and directed Bayes' nets. A stochastic logic program consists of a set of labelled clauses p:C where p is in the interval [0,1] and C is a first-order range-restricted definite clause. This paper summarises the syntax, distributional semantics and proof techniques for SLPs and then discusses how a standard Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) system, Progol, has been modied to support learning of SLPs. The resulting system 1) nds an SLP with uniform probability labels on each definition and near-maximal Bayes posterior probability and then 2) alters the probability labels to further increase the posterior probability. Stage 1) is implemented within CProgol4.5, which differs from previous versions of Progol by allowing user-defined evaluation functions written in Prolog. It is shown that maximising the Bayesian posterior function involves nding SLPs with short derivations of the examples. Search pruning with the Bayesian evaluation function is carried out in the same way as in previous versions of CProgol. The system is demonstrated with worked examples involving the learning of probability distributions over sequences as well as the learning of simple forms of uncertain knowledge. user correction
YEAR 2000 user correction
CITATIONS 9 found ParsCit 1.0
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University