• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Learning Bayesian network structure from massive datasets: The “sparse candidate” algorithm (1999)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.iastate.edu]
  • [www.cs.huji.ac.il]
  • [www.kddresearch.org]
  • [www.sysbio.harvard.edu]
  • [www.cs.huji.ac.il]
  • [www.cs.huji.ac.il]
  • [www.biostat.wisc.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [www.cs.huji.ac.il]
  • [www.cs.huji.ac.il]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Nir Friedman
Citations:141 - 10 self
  • Summary
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

Versions

  • Version 0
  • Version 1

Version History

Metadata Version 0

DatumValueSource
TITLE Learning Bayesian Network Structure from Massive Datasets: The “Sparse Candidate ” Algorithm SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR NAME Nir Friedman SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR AFFIL Institute of Computer Science; Hebrew University SVM HeaderParse 0.2
AUTHOR ADDR Jerusalem, 91904, ISRAEL SVM HeaderParse 0.2
ABSTRACT Learning Bayesian networks is often cast as an optimization problem, where the computational task is to find a structure that maximizes a statistically motivated score. By and large, existing learning tools address this optimization problem using standard heuristic search techniques. Since the search space is extremely large, such search procedures can spend most of the time examining candidates that are extremely unreasonable. This problem becomes critical when we deal with data sets that are large either in the number of instances, or the number of attributes. In this paper, we introduce an algorithm that achieves faster learning by restricting the search space. This iterative algorithm restricts the parents of each variable to belong to a small subset of candidates. We then search for a network that satisfies these constraints. The learned network is then used for selecting better candidates for the next iteration. We evaluate this algorithm both on synthetic and real-life data. Our results show that it is significantly faster than alternative search procedures without loss of quality in the learned structures. 1 SVM HeaderParse 0.2
CITATIONS 24 found ParsCit 1.0
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University