Reachability is harder for directed than for undirected finite graphs (1990)
| Venue: | Journal of Symbolic Logic |
| Citations: | 69 - 8 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Ajtai90reachabilityis,
author = {Miklos Ajtai and Ronald Fagin},
title = {Reachability is harder for directed than for undirected finite graphs},
journal = {Journal of Symbolic Logic},
year = {1990},
volume = {55},
pages = {113--150}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
Abstract. Although it is known that reachability in undirected finite graphs can be expressed by an existential monadic second-order sentence, our main result is that this is not the case for directed finite graphs (even in the presence of certain “built-in ” relations, such as the successor relation). The proof makes use of Ehrenfeucht-Frai’sse games, along with probabilistic arguments. However, we show that for directed finite graphs with degree at most k, reachability is expressible by an existential monadic second-order sentence. $1. Introduction. If s and t denote distinguished points in a directed (resp. undirected) graph, then we say that a graph is (s, t)-connected if there is a directed (undirected) path from s to t. We sometimes refer to the problem of deciding whether a given directed (undirected) graph with two given points sand t is (s, t)-connected as the directed (undirected) reachability problem.







