ARC: A self-tuning, low overhead replacement cache

ARC: A self-tuning, low overhead replacement cache (2003)

Cached

Download Links

Other Repositories/Bibliography

DBLP

by Nimrod Megiddo , Dharmendra S. Modha

Venue:	In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST
Citations:	129 - 4 self

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Megiddo03arc:a,
    author = {Nimrod Megiddo and Dharmendra S. Modha},
    title = {ARC: A self-tuning, low overhead replacement cache},
    booktitle = {In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST},
    year = {2003},
    pages = {115--130}
}

Years of Citing Articles

Bookmark

OpenURL

Abstract

Abstract — We consider the problem of cache management in a demand paging scenario with uniform page sizes. We propose a new cache management policy, namely, Adaptive Replacement Cache (ARC), that has several advantages. In response to evolving and changing access patterns, ARC dynamically, adaptively, and continually balances between the recency and frequency components in an online and selftuning fashion. The policy ARC uses a learning rule to adaptively and continually revise its assumptions about the workload. The policy ARC is empirically universal, that is, it empirically performs as well as a certain fixed replacement policy– even when the latter uses the best workload-specific tuning parameter that was selected in an offline fashion. Consequently, ARC works uniformly well across varied workloads and cache sizes without any need for workload specific a priori knowledge or tuning. Various policies such as LRU-2, 2Q, LRFU, and LIRS require user-defined parameters, and, unfortunately, no single choice works uniformly well across different workloads and cache sizes. The policy ARC is simple-to-implement and, like LRU, has constant complexity per request. In comparison, policies LRU-2 and LRFU both require logarithmic time complexity in the cache size. The policy ARC is scan-resistant: it allows one-time sequential requests to pass through without polluting the cache. On ¢¡ real-life traces drawn from numerous domains, ARC leads to substantial performance gains over LRU for a wide range of cache sizes. For example, for a SPC1 like synthetic benchmark, at 4GB cache, LRU delivers a hit ratio £¥¤§¦¨£�© of while ARC achieves a hit ratio of ¢� I.

Citations

No citations identified.