A Comparative Study of Methods for Hypermedia Development (1999)
Cached
Download Links
| Citations: | 32 - 5 self |
BibTeX
@TECHREPORT{Koch99acomparative,
author = {Nora Koch and Ludwig-maximilians-universität München},
title = {A Comparative Study of Methods for Hypermedia Development},
institution = {},
year = {1999}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of the most relevant methodologies for hypermedia and Web development published in the last few years. Most of these methods focus on the design of hypermedia applications; only a few cover more aspects of the life cycle, such as requirements capture, implementation and/or testing. One common characteristic is the separation of the domain analysis from the specification of the navigation space structure as well as from the design of the user interface. A brief description of each of these methodologies is given as well as a set of comparisons. We compare the main concepts, the phases o steps of the model, CASE Tool support as well as the modelling technique, notation and graphical representation. A list of the most relevant characteristics of the Unified Process is given as well comparing it to hypermedia development methodologies.
Keyphrases
comparative study hypermedia development common characteristic case tool support unified process main concept development methodology graphical representation brief description hypermedia application domain analysis user interface web development life cycle relevant characteristic last year requirement capture relevant methodology modelling technique navigation space structure
