David Amid
BibTeX
@MISC{Shir_davidamid,
author = {Ofer M. Shir and Shahar Chen and David Boaz and Dmitry Moor},
title = {David Amid},
year = {}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Simulation performance may be evaluated according to multiple quality measures that are in competition and their simultaneous consideration poses a conflict. In the current study we propose a practical framework for investigating such simulation performance criteria, exploring the inherent conflicts amongst them and identifying the best available tradeoffs, based upon multiobjective Pareto optimization. This approach necessitates the rigorous derivation of performance criteria to serve as objective functions and undergo vector optimization. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach by applying it to a specific Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) simulation, with multiple stochastic quality measures. We formulate performance criteria of this use-case, pose an optimization problem, and solve it by means of a simulation-based Pareto approach. Upon attainment of the underlying Pareto Frontier, we analyze it and prescribe preference-dependent configurations for the optimal simulation training. 1
Keyphrases
david amid performance criterion simulation performance criterion simultaneous consideration multiobjective pareto optimization multiple stochastic quality measure current study inherent conflict optimal simulation training underlying pareto frontier rigorous derivation specific artificial neural network optimization problem multiple quality measure simulation-based pareto approach preference-dependent configuration simulation performance undergo vector optimization available tradeoff objective function practical framework
