Abstract

With the inclusion of an effective methodology, this article answers in detail a question that, for a quarter of a century, remained open despite intense study byvarious researchers. Is the formula XCB = e(x# e(e(e(x# y)#e(z#y))#z)) a single axiom for the classical equivalential calculus when the rules of inference consist of detachment(modus ponens) and substitution? Where the function e represents equivalence, this calculus can be axiomatized quite naturally with the formulas e(x# x), e(e(x# y)#e(y#x)), and e(e(x# y)#e(e(y#z)#e(x# z))), which correspond to reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, respectively.(We note that e(x# x) is dependent on the other two axioms.) Heretofore, thirteen shortest single axioms for classical equivalence of length eleven had been discovered, and XCB was the only remaining formula of that length whose status was undetermined. ToshowthatXCB is indeed such a single axiom, we focus on the rule of condensed detachment, a rule that captures detachment together with an appropriately general, but restricted, form of substitution. The proof we present in this paper consists of twenty-fi e applications of condensed detachment, completing with the deduction of transitivity followed by a deduction of symmetry.We also discuss some factors that may explain in part why XCB resisted relinquishing its treasure for so long. Our approach relied on diverse strategies applied by the automated reasoning program OTTER. Thus ends the search for shortest single axioms for the equivalential calculus.

Citations