ADAPTIVE OPTIMIZATION FOR SELF: RECONCILING HIGH PERFORMANCE WITH EXPLORATORY PROGRAMMING (1994)
| Citations: | 95 - 6 self |
BibTeX
@MISC{Hölzle94adaptiveoptimization,
author = {Urs Hölzle},
title = {ADAPTIVE OPTIMIZATION FOR SELF: RECONCILING HIGH PERFORMANCE WITH EXPLORATORY PROGRAMMING},
year = {1994}
}
Years of Citing Articles
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
Object-oriented programming languages confer many benefits, including abstraction, which lets the programmer hide the details of an object’s implementation from the object’s clients. Unfortunately, crossing abstraction boundaries often incurs a substantial run-time overhead in the form of frequent procedure calls. Thus, pervasive use of abstraction, while desirable from a design standpoint, may be impractical when it leads to inefficient programs. Aggressive compiler optimizations can reduce the overhead of abstraction. However, the long compilation times introduced by optimizing compilers delay the programming environment‘s responses to changes in the program. Furthermore, optimization also conflicts with source-level debugging. Thus, programmers are caught on the horns of two dilemmas: they have to choose between abstraction and efficiency, and between responsive programming environments and efficiency. This dissertation shows how to reconcile these seemingly contradictory goals by performing optimizations lazily. Four new techniques work together to achieve high performance and high responsiveness: • Type feedback achieves high performance by allowing the compiler to inline message sends based on information extracted from the runtime system. On average, programs run 1.5 times faster than the previous SELF system; compared to a commercial Smalltalk implementation, two medium-sized benchmarks run about three times faster. This level of performance is obtained with a compiler that is both simpler and faster than previous SELF compilers. • Adaptive optimization achieves high responsiveness without sacrificing performance by using a fast nonoptimizing compiler to generate initial code while automatically recompiling heavily used parts of the program with an optimizing compiler. On a previous-generation workstation like the SPARCstation-2, fewer than 200 pauses exceeded 200 ms during a 50-minute interaction, and 21 pauses exceeded one second. On a currentgeneration workstation, only 13 pauses exceed 400 ms. • Dynamic deoptimization shields the programmer from the complexity of debugging optimized code by transparently recreating non-optimized code as needed. No matter whether a program is optimized or not, it can always be stopped, inspected, and single-stepped. Compared to previous approaches, deoptimization allows more debugging while placing fewer restrictions on the optimizations that can be performed. • Polymorphic inline caching generates type-case sequences on-the-fly to speed up messages sent from the same call site to several different types of object. More significantly, they collect concrete type information for the optimizing compiler. With better performance yet good interactive behavior, these techniques make exploratory programming possible both for pure object-oriented languages and for application domains requiring higher ultimate performance, reconciling exploratory programming, ubiquitous abstraction, and high performance.
