@MISC{Zinn99structuringtextbook, author = {Claus Zinn}, title = {Structuring Textbook Proofs}, year = {1999} }
Bookmark
OpenURL
Abstract
We propose a promising research problem, the machine verification of textbook proofs. It shows that textbook proofs are a sufficiently complex and highly structured form of discourse, embedded in a well-defined and well-understood domain, thus offering an ideal domain for discourse analysis. Because recognizing the structure of a proof is a prerequisite for verifying the correctness of a given mathematical argument, we define a four component model of discourse segmentation. 1 Introduction In order to advance our knowledge of discourse understanding, we have to 1. tackle real-world problems, that is study discourse that is sufficiently complex; 2. build ontologies and formalize knowledge about the domain of discourse; 3. seriously address representation issues; 4. apply reasoning techniques. This is nothing new. But did you ever see a natural language system where each of these four issues has been successfully addressed? Contrarily, many research resources has been spent on a family...