Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree: Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test? (1997)
| Venue: | Journal of Finance |
| Citations: | 66 - 0 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Kyle97speculationduopoly,
author = {Albert S. Kyle and F. Albert Wang and Jim Peck and S. Viswanathan},
title = {Speculation Duopoly with Agreement to Disagree: Can Overconfidence Survive the Market Test?},
journal = {Journal of Finance},
year = {1997},
volume = {52},
pages = {2073--2090}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
In a duopoly model of informed speculation, we show that overconfidence may strictly dominate rationality since an overconfident trader may not only generate higher expected profit and utility than his rational opponent, but also higher than if he were also rational. This occurs because overconfidence acts like a commitment device in a standard Cournot duopoly. As a result, for some parameter values the Nash equilibrium of a two-fund game is a Prisoner's Dilemma in which both funds hire overconfident managers. Thus, overconfidence can persist and survive in the long run. 2 The rational expectations hypothesis implies that economic agents make decisions as though they know a correct probability distribution of the underlying uncertainty. According to the traditional view (Alchian (1950) and Friedman (1953)), the rational expectations hypothesis is empirically plausible because rational beliefs are better able to survive the market test than irrational beliefs. Yet, the empirical liter...







