The GOMS Family of User Interface Analysis Techniques: Comparison and Contrast (0)
| Venue: | ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction |
| Citations: | 174 - 6 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{John_thegoms,
author = {Bonnie E. John and David E. Kieras},
title = {The GOMS Family of User Interface Analysis Techniques: Comparison and Contrast},
journal = {ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction},
year = {},
volume = {3},
pages = {320--351}
}
Years of Citing Articles
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
ing with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers, or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from Publications Dept, ACM Inc., fax +1 (212) 869-0481, or permissions@acm.org. GOMS Family Comparison p. 2 2 Keywords: GOMS, cognitive modeling, usability engineering ABSTRACT Since the publication of The psychology of human-computer interaction (Card, Moran & Newell, 1983), the GOMS model has been one of the most widely known theoretical concepts in HCI. This concept has produced several GOMS analysis techniques that differ in appearance and form, underlying architectural assumptions, and predictive power. This paper compares and contrasts four popular variants of the GOMS family (the Keystroke-Level Model, the original GOMS formulation, NGOMSL, and CPM-GOMS) by applying them to a single task example. 1. INTRODUCTION Since the publication of The psychology of human-computer interaction (Card, Mora...
