Planning as Constraint Satisfaction: Solving the planning-graph by compiling it into CSP (2001)
| Venue: | Artificial Intelligence |
| Citations: | 42 - 8 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Do01planningas,
author = {Minh Binh Do and Subbarao Kambhampati},
title = {Planning as Constraint Satisfaction: Solving the planning-graph by compiling it into CSP},
journal = {Artificial Intelligence},
year = {2001},
volume = {132},
pages = {151--182}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
Although the deep affinity between Graphplan's backward search, and the process of solving constraint satisfaction problems has been noted earlier, these relations have hither-to been primarily used to adapt CSP search techniques into the backward search phase of Graphplan. This paper describes GP-CSP, a system that does planning by automatically converting Graphplan's planning graph into a CSP encoding, and solving the CSP encoding using standard CSP solvers. Our comprehensive empirical evaluation of GP-CSP demonstrates that it is superior to both standard Graphplan and Blackbox system, which compiles planning graphs into SAT encodings. Our results show that CSP encodings outperform SAT encodings in terms of both space and time requirements. The space reduction is particularly important as it makes GP-CSP less susceptible to the memory blow-up associated with SAT compilation methods. Our work is inspired by the success of van Beek & Chen's CPLAN system. However, in contrast...







