DMCA
Comparative analysis of five xml query languages
Cached
Download Links
- [arxiv.org]
- [arxiv.org]
- [www.toriisoft.com]
- [www.oasis-open.org]
- [xml.coverpages.org]
- DBLP
Other Repositories/Bibliography
| Venue: | SIGMOD Record |
| Citations: | 84 - 2 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Bonifati_comparativeanalysis,
author = {Angela Bonifati and Stefano Ceri},
title = {Comparative analysis of five xml query languages},
journal = {SIGMOD Record},
year = {},
pages = {2000}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
XML is becoming the most relevant new standard for data representation and exchange on the WWW. Novel languages for extracting and restructuring the XML content have been proposed, some in the tradition of database query languages (i.e. SQL, OQL), others more closely inspired by XML. No standard for XML query language has yet been decided, but the discussion is ongoing within the World Wide Web Consortium and within many academic institutions and Internet-related major companies. We present a comparison of five, representative query languages for XML, highlighting their common features and differences. 1 Introduction to the five languages 1.1 LOREL LOREL was originally designed for querying semistructured data and has now been extended to XML data; it was conceived and implemented at Stanford University (S. Abiteboul, D. Quass, J. McHugh, J. Widom, J. Wiener) and its prototype is at
