Methodological Issues in Simulating the Emergence of Language (2000) [5 citations — 1 self]
Abstract:
this paper we explore Kirby's simulations in greater detail. Kirby credited his results to the `learning bottleneck' but didn't examine variations in learners, tasks or parameters. His choice of learner was motivated only by the fact that it had been developed as an algorithm for grammar induction, and the choice of semantic domain was constrained so as to have combinatorial structure. The question we consider is whether the learning bottleneck is the primary factor with other kinds of learners and a dierently structured domains. In previous work, we have considered communication between a pair of recurrent neural networks. Two networks try to communicate a \concept" represented by a point in the unit interval, [0; 1], over a symbolic channel. One network sends a sequence of symbols for each concept, which the other receives and processes back into a concept. Using this framework, we have shown how a language can evolve to accommodate opposing biases between encoder and decoder [11], and how language evolution can facilitate learning by adapting towards the forms that exploit the weak biases of a general purpose learner [12].

