DMCA
Sex, Syntax, and Semantics (2000)
Cached
Download Links
- [www.cis.upenn.edu]
- [www.mit.edu]
- [www.mit.edu]
- [www-psych.stanford.edu]
- [web.mit.edu]
- [www-psych.stanford.edu]
- DBLP
Other Repositories/Bibliography
| Citations: | 49 - 6 self |
BibTeX
@MISC{Boroditsky00sex,syntax,,
author = {Lera Boroditsky and Lauren A. Schmidt},
title = {Sex, Syntax, and Semantics},
year = {2000}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Many languages have a grammatical gender system whereby all nouns are assigned a gender (most commonly feminine, masculine, or neuter). Two studies examined whether (1) the assignment of genders to nouns is truly arbitrary (as has been claimed), and (2) whether the grammatical genders assigned to nouns have semantic consequences. In the first study, English speakers intuitions about the genders of animals (but not artifacts) were found to correlate with the grammatical genders assigned to the names of these objects in Spanish and German. These findings suggest that the assignment of genders to nouns is not entirely arbitrary but may to some extent reflect the perceived masculine or feminine properties of the nouns referents. Results of the second study suggested that peoples ideas about the genders of objects are strongly influenced by the grammatical genders assigned to these objects in their native language. Spanish and German speakers memory for object--name pairs (e.g., apple--Patricia) was better for pairs where the gender of the proper name was congruent with the grammatical gender of the object name (in their native language), than when the two genders were incongruent.
