## On Yetter’s invariant and an extension of the Dijkgraaf-Witten invariant to categorical groups

### Cached

### Download Links

Venue: | Theory Appl. Categ |

Citations: | 10 - 0 self |

### BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Martins_onyetter’s,

author = {João Faria Martins and Timothy Porter},

title = {On Yetter’s invariant and an extension of the Dijkgraaf-Witten invariant to categorical groups},

journal = {Theory Appl. Categ},

year = {},

pages = {118--150}

}

### OpenURL

### Abstract

We give an interpretation of Yetter’s Invariant of manifolds M in terms of the homotopy type of the function space TOP(M,B(G)), where G is a crossed module and B(G) is its classifying space. From this formulation, there follows that Yetter’s invariant depends only on the homotopy type of M, and the weak homotopy type of the crossed module G. We use this interpretation to define a twisting of Yetter’s Invariant by cohomology classes of crossed modules, defined

### Citations

479 | An introduction to homological algebra, Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics 38 - Weibel - 1994 |

188 |
Elements of homotopy theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 61
- Whitehead
- 1978
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...specified, uniquely, by its value on the set of free generators of H. In other words, any map from the set of generators of H into E uniquely extends to a derivation d: H → E. Proof. This is shown in =-=[W1]-=- (Lemma 3) for the case in which H is a group, and is easy to prove. The general case can be proved directly in the same way. Alternatively, we can reduce it to the group case by using the free group ... |

124 | On the algebra of cubes - Brown - 1981 |

78 | Colimit theorems for relative homotopy groups
- Brown, Higgins
- 1981
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...fore a group if n � 2. Denote also A1(a, b) = {a1 ∈ A1: s(a1) = a, t(a1) = b}, where a, b ∈ A0. 1.1.4 The General van Kampen Theorem The category of crossed complexes is a category with colimits; see =-=[BH2]-=-, section 6. Under mild conditions, the functor Π from the category of filtered spaces to the category of crossed complexes preserves colimits. This fact is known as the “General van Kampen Theorem”, ... |

73 |
Topological Gauge Theories and
- Dijkgraaf, Witten
- 1990
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...red. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 18F99; 57M27; 57R56; 81T25. Introduction Let G be a finite group. In the context of Topological Gauge Field Theory, R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten defined in =-=[DW]-=- a 3-dimensional manifold invariant for each 3-dimensional cohomology class of G. When M is a triangulated manifold, the Dijkgraaf-Witten Invariant can be expressed in terms of a state sum model, remi... |

69 | Simplicial homotopy theory - Curtis - 1971 |

67 |
On the 3-type of a complex
- Lane, Whitehead
- 1956
(Show Context)
Citation Context ... modules, it is well known that any connected 2-type can be represented as the classifying space of a reduced crossed module, a result which is essentially due to S. Mac Lane and J.H.C Whitehead; see =-=[MLW]-=-. See for example [BH5] for an alternative proof. In fact it is possible to prove that the homotopy category of connected 2-types is equivalent to Ho(X−mod), where X−mod is the category of reduced cro... |

66 |
On spaces having the homotopy type of a CW-complex
- Milnor
- 1959
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...on of η will be needed in the last chapter. We therefore have that η is a homotopy equivalence when C is finite, because then it follows that TOP(|C|, B(G)) has the homotopy type of a CW-complex; see =-=[Mi2]-=-. 1.3.3 The Fundamental Groups of Classifying Spaces of Crossed Modules Let G = (G, E, ∂, ⊲) be a crossed module, not necessarily reduced. Let P be the object set of G and E. There exists a bijective ... |

64 |
Regge T., Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients
- Ponzano
- 1968
(Show Context)
Citation Context ... Viro, because of their construction of a non-trivial closed 3-manifold state sum invariant from quantum 6j-symbols (see [TV]), regularising the divergences of the celebrated Ponzano-Regge Model (see =-=[PR]-=-), which is powerful enough to distinguish homotopic, though non homeomorphic, manifolds. For categorically inclined introductions to state sum invariants of manifolds we refer the reader to [T, BW, M... |

56 | On the connection between the second relative homotopy groups of some related spaces - Brown, Higgins - 1978 |

52 | Groupoids and crossed objects in algebraic topology - Brown - 1999 |

47 | The classifying space of a crossed complex
- Brown, Higgins
- 1991
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...of A is, by definition, the simplicial set whose set of n-simplices is given by all crossed complex morphisms Π(|∆(n)|) → A, with the obvious face and degeneracy maps. It is a Kan simplicial set; see =-=[BH5]-=-. The classifying space B(A) of A is the geometric realisation |N(A)| of the nerve of A. This construction appeared first in [Bl]. Let us unpack this definition in the reduced crossed module case; see... |

45 | Tensor products and homotopies for ω-groupoids and crossed complexes
- Brown
- 1987
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...ft groupoid action of CRS1(A, G) on CRS2(A, G) by automorphisms, and together with the boundary map ∂: CRS2(A, G) → CRS1(A, G), already described, defines a crossed module CRS(A, G). This is shown in =-=[BH4]-=- in the general case when G is a crossed complex. 1.2 Yetter’s Invariant of Manifolds 1.2.1 G-colouring and Yetter’s Invariant Let G = (G, E, ∂, ⊲) be a finite reduced crossed module. Let M be a trian... |

41 |
The geometric realization of a semi-simplicial complex
- Milnor
- 1957
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...ace, then S(M) is the singular complex of M. Since D is a Kan simplicial set, it follows that D is a strong deformation retract of S(|D|), a fact usually known as Milnor’s Theorem, see [FP], 4.5, and =-=[Mi1]-=-. The map j1 is the geometric realisation of the inclusion SIMP(C, D) → SIMP(C, S|D|), and is therefore a homotopy equivalence. There exists a one-to-one correspondence between simplicial maps C × ∆(n... |

39 | Invariants of piecewise-linear 3-manifolds - Barrett, Westbury - 1996 |

37 | Abstract Homotopy and Simple Homotopy Theory - Kamps, Porter - 1997 |

36 | Simple homotopy types - Whitehead - 1950 |

31 | Zisman: Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 35 - Gabriel, M - 1967 |

24 |
reprint of the 1975 edition
- Lane, Homology
- 1995
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...inclusion map i: C r (D) . = C(D)/C d (D) → C(D) such that p ◦ i = id, with i ◦ p being homotopic to the identity. Here p: C(D) → C r (D) is the projection map. This is the Normalisation Theorem; see =-=[ML]-=-, VIII.6. In this article, we will consider the unnormalised simplicial chain complex. Note that if M is an ordered simplicial complex, then the simplicial chain complex of DM, the simplicial set made... |

23 | Identities among relations, in Low dimensional topology, Ed. R.Brown and - Brown, Huebschmann - 1982 |

23 |
Topological quantum field theories associated to finite groups and crossed G-sets
- Yetter
- 1992
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...ned a 3-dimensional TQFT, which included the ω = 1 case of the Dijkgraaf-Witten Invariant, though he did not incorporate group cohomology classes into his TQFT. This construction appeared upgraded in =-=[Y2]-=-, where D.N. Yetter extended his framework to handle categorical groups. Recall that categorical groups are equivalent to crossed modules. They are often easier to consider when handling the objects a... |

19 | Crossed complexes and homotopy groupoids as non commutative tools for higher dimensional local-to-global problems - Brown - 2009 |

15 | Mackaay: Categorical representations of categorical groups - Barrett, M - 2003 |

14 |
Some Relations between Homology and Homotopy Groups
- Blakers
- 1948
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...and π2(B(G), ∗) → π2(B(H), ∗). By Theorem 1.18, this can be stated in algebraic terms. For the description of the associated model structure on the category of crossed modules, we refer the reader to =-=[BG]-=-. In particular, it follows that the reduced crossed modules G and H are weak equivalent if and only if B(G) and B(H) have the same 2-type. Since these CW-complexes are 2-types themselves, there follo... |

13 | Homology of 2-types - Ellis - 1992 |

12 | A model structure for the homotopy theory of crossed complexes. Cahiers Topologie Geom. Differentielle Categoriques 30 - Brown, Golasinski - 1989 |

12 | G-groupoids, crossed modules and the fundamental groupoid of a topological group - Brown - 1976 |

11 | On the second relative homotopy group of an adjunction space: an exposition of a theorem of - Brown - 1980 |

11 |
Cellular structures in topology. Cambridge Univ
- Fritsch, Piccinini
- 1990
(Show Context)
Citation Context ... topological space, then S(M) is the singular complex of M. Since D is a Kan simplicial set, it follows that D is a strong deformation retract of S(|D|), a fact usually known as Milnor’s Theorem, see =-=[FP]-=-, 4.5. The map j1 is the geometric realisation of the inclusion SIMP(C, D) → SIMP(C, S|D|), and is therefore a homotopy equivalence. There exists a one-to-one correspondence between simplicial maps C ... |

11 | Interpretations of Yetter’s notion of G-coloring: simplicial fibre bundles and non-abelian cohomology
- Porter
- 1996
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...duced crossed module. There exists a one-to-one correspondence between G-colourings of M and maps Π(M) → G, where M has the natural CW-decomposition given by its triangulation. This result appears in =-=[P1]-=- (Proposition 2.1). Note that any map f : Π(M) → G yields a G-colouring c f of M, where c f (K) = f(h(K)). Here K is a non-degenerate simplex of M. To prove this we need to use the Homotopy Addition L... |

9 | Spin foam models. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 15:1827–1858 - Baez - 1998 |

9 | Sivera R., Nonabelian algebraic topology, Vols - Brown, Higgins |

8 |
Topological quantum field theories from homotopy n-types
- Porter
- 1998
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...2], where an extension of Yetter’s Invariant to handle general models of n-types appears. The construction of M. Mackaay in [Mk2] is related, conjecturally, with the n = 3 case of the construction in =-=[P2]-=-, with a further twisting by cohomology classes of 3-types, in the Dijkgraaf-Witten way. In [FM1, FM2], D.N. Yetter’s ideas were applied to 2-dimensional knot theory, and yielded interesting invariant... |

7 | On the Eilenberg-Zilber Theorem for Crossed Complexes - Tonks |

6 | Co)Homology of crossed modules with coefficients in a pi1-module
- Paoli
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...xplicit Description of the Low Dimensional Coboundary Maps Let G = (G, E, ∂, ⊲) be a reduced crossed module. We consider the U(1)cohomology of G. This is a very particular case of the construction in =-=[Pa]-=-. There was considered the general case of cohomology with coefficients in any π1(B(G))-module. From the discussion above, the group C 3 (G) of 3-cochains of G is given by all maps ω: G 3 × E 4 → U(1)... |

6 | The simplicial extension theorem - Sanderson |

5 | Formal Homotopy Quantum Field Theories I: Formal maps and crossed C-algebras
- Porter, Turaev
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...ulation of M. In particular f ∗ (ω) is well defined in the simplicial category for any continuous map f : M → B(G). The Simplicial Approximation Theorem (for simplicial sets) is proved for example in =-=[S]-=-. Note also the Normalisation Theorem stated in 2.1.1. The proof of Theorem 2.5 is analogous to the proof of Theorem 1.21. The main lemma which we will use for its proof is the following. 38Lemma 2.6... |

4 | Lauda A.D.: Higher-dimensional algebra - Baez |

4 |
Içen ˙ I: Homotopies and Automorphisms of Crossed Modules
- Brown
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...d action ⊲ of G on E by automorphisms. The conditions on ⊲ and ∂ are: 1. ∂(X ⊲e) = X∂(e)X −1 , if X ∈ G and e ∈ E are such that t(X) = β(e), 2. ∂(e) ⊲ f = efe −1 , if e, f ∈ E verify β(e) = β(f). See =-=[BI]-=-, section 1. Notice that for any e ∈ E we must have s(∂(e)) = t(∂(e)) = β(e). A crossed module is called reduced if P is a singleton. This implies that both G and E are groups. A morphism F = (φ, ψ) b... |

4 | O.Ya.: State sum invariants of 3-manifolds and quantum 6j-symbols. Topology 31 - Turaev, Viro - 1992 |

3 |
On 2-Dimensional Homotopy Invariants of Complements of Knotted Surfaces, math.GT/0507239. [GH] [H] Gutiérrez M., Hirschhorn P.: Free Simplicial Groups and the Second Relative Homotopy Group of an Adjunction
- J
- 1986
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...llary 1.20. In a future work, we will investigate the behaviour of IG under arbitrary crossed module maps G → H, in order to generalise this result. Yetter’s Invariant was extended to CW-complexes in =-=[FM2]-=-, where an alternative proof of its existence is given, using a totally different argument 24to the one just shown. Also in the cellular category, an extension of Yetter’s Invariant to crossed comple... |

3 |
On the Homotopy Type and the Fundamental Crossed Complex of the Skeletal Filtration of a CW-Complex
- J
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...ternative proof of its existence is given, using a totally different argument to the one just shown. Also in the cellular category, an extension of Yetter’s Invariant to crossed complexes appeared in =-=[FM3]-=-. In [FM1, FM2], algorithms 21are given for the calculation of Yetter’s Invariant of complements of knotted embedded surfaces in S 4 , producing non-trivial invariants of 2knots. Other similar interp... |

2 | State Sum Models and Quantum Gravity, XIIIth - Barrett - 2001 |

2 | Categorical Groups Knots and Knotted Surfaces - J |

2 | Theory Ramifications 2 - Pais - 1993 |

1 |
J.P.: Simplicial Objects in Algebraic Topology
- Co, Inc
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...tement. Consider the complex C(D) = {Cn(D), ∂n} of simplicial chains of D. Here Cn(D) is the free abelian group on the set Dn of n-simplices of D. Furthermore ∂(c) = ∑n i=0 (−1)i∂i(c), if c ∈ Dn; see =-=[Ma]-=-, 1.2, or [We], 8.2. Note that the assignment D ↦→ C(D), where D is a simplicial set is functorial. The homology of a simplicial set D is defined as being the homology of the chain complex C(D). The c... |

1 | Turaev V.G.: Formal Homotopy Quantum Field Theories - Porter |

1 |
Turaev V.G.: Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds. de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 18. Walter de Gruyter
- Math
- 1994
(Show Context)
Citation Context ...specified, uniquely, by its value on the set of free generators of H. In other words, any map from the set of generators of H into E uniquely extends to a derivation d: H → E. Proof. This is shown in =-=[W1]-=- (Lemma 3) for the case in which H is a group, and is easy to prove. The general case can be proved directly in the same 20way. Alternatively, we can reduce it to the group case by using the free gro... |